Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian bombers intercepted near US Navy vessel (Tupolev 95 flew 2000ft directly over USS Nimitz)
ynet ^ | 02.12.08 | ynet

Posted on 02/11/2008 3:45:40 PM PST by Flavius

Edited on 02/11/2008 4:36:47 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Russian bomber aircraft approached a US Aircraft carrier in the Pacific on Saturday and were intercepted by American fighter jets, a US Defense official said on Monday...

Excerpt. Story continues: YNetNews



Update:

Google AP

Navy Intercepts Russian Bombers

By LOLITA C. BALDOR – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. fighter planes intercepted two Russian bombers, including one that buzzed an American aircraft carrier in the western Pacific during the weekend, The Associated Press has learned.

A U.S. military official says that one Russian Tupolev 95 flew directly over the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz twice, at a low altitude of about 2,000 feet, while another bomber circled about 58 miles out. The official was speaking on condition of anonymity because the reports on the flights were classified as secret.

The Saturday incident, which never escalated beyond the flyover, comes amid heightened tensions between the United States and Russia over U.S. plans for a missile defense system based in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Such Russian bomber flights were common during the Cold War, but have been rare since.

The bombers were among four Russian Tupolev 95s launched from Ukrainka in the middle of the night, including one that Japanese officials say violated their country's airspace over an uninhabited island south of Tokyo.

U.S. officials tracked and monitored the bombers as two flew south along the Japanese coast, and two others flew farther east, coming closer to the Nimitz and the guided missile cruiser USS Princeton.

As the bombers got about 500 miles out from the U.S. ships, four F/A-18 fighters were launched from the Nimitz, the official said. The fighters intercepted the Russian bombers about 50 miles south of the Nimitz.

At least two U.S. F/A-18 Hornets trailed the bomber as it came in low over the Nimitz twice, while one or two of the other U.S. fighters followed the second bomber as it circled.

The official said there were no verbal communications between the U.S. and the Russians, and the Pentagon has not heard of any protests being filed by the United States. Historically, diplomatic protests were not filed in such incidents because they were so common during the Cold War era.

This is the first time Russian Tupolevs have flown over or interacted with a U.S. carrier since 2004.

In that incident, a Russian Tupolev flew over the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk in the Sea of Japan on Jan. 29, 2004. Since then, however, relations between the U.S. and Russia have deteriorated to their worst point since the Cold War, largely due to the United States' plans to put a radar system in the Czech Republic and 10 missile defense interceptors in Poland.

The U.S. has defended the plan as necessary to protect its European allies from possible attacks by Iran. But the Kremlin has condemned the proposal, saying it would threaten Russia's security.

"We are being forced to take retaliatory steps," said Russian President Vladimir Putin, who also warned that a new arms race is under way.

Japan, meanwhile, filed a formal protest with the Russian Embassy in Tokyo after Saturday's incident, saying that one of the Russian bombers crossed into Japanese airspace for three minutes. Russia has denied there was an intrusion.

AP Google


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Russia; US: California
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bmd; cccp; coldwar2; communism; missiledefense; navair; putin; redairforce; redjihad; russia; securitybreach; sovietunion; usa; ussnimitz; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-335 last
To: ricmc2175
Jimmy Carter was not a better CINC than Ronald Wilson Reagan. The veteran versus civilian canard does not fly.

Reagan served in the Army Air Corps during WW-II. Neither saw any combat. Reagan made training films...somebody had to do it, and he was after all an actor.

321 posted on 02/12/2008 6:21:47 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Well....that’s to be expected.

Why put up defenses if they don’t defend from potential 360-degree inbounds?


322 posted on 02/12/2008 6:22:32 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

The Russians started squeeelin’ as soon as they found out

how close to their border the system will be built...


323 posted on 02/12/2008 6:35:19 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Well, it’s not exactly like the ruskies have been friends, nor even trusted friends.

While Bush said he “looked the man in the eye. I was able to get a sense of his soul,” I could see the soul without looking in his eyes. They are evil.


324 posted on 02/12/2008 6:39:40 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
But I'll bet they did not fly right over it, and they were escorted, as this one was.

I was in escorts - destroyers and frigates - and we operated with carriers and amphibs. And sometimes they did fly right over it. When we were with the carrier they did intercept them. The time we were with the LPH there obviously wasn't anything to intercept them with. We did go to GQ though.

BTW, I never said it should have been shot down, I said it was performing an unfriendly act or a hostile act.

So what should they have done that they did not do, if not shoot it down?

325 posted on 02/12/2008 6:57:54 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

While Bush said he “looked the man in the eye. I was able to get a sense of his soul,”
~~~
Needs his eyes checked...;0)


326 posted on 02/12/2008 8:10:01 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

lol

I think he needs more help than just that. : )


327 posted on 02/12/2008 8:12:23 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Russian overflight of US warship ‘benign’: US Navy chief

16 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) — The chief of the US Navy said Tuesday an overflight of a US aircraft carrier by a Russian bomber off Japan was “benign” and unprovocative, adding that US crew were not called to combat stations.

Admiral Gary Roughead said he had not asked Moscow for an explanation, but offered one of his own: the Russian military is trying to re-emerge as a global force.

“But I did not consider it to be provocative,” he said of Saturday’s overflight of the USS Nimitz in the western Pacific.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hQwYooD1CiqCqcmYUG1lZgfXMARA


328 posted on 02/13/2008 4:34:11 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

From the same article:

the State Department did not “at this point intend to do anything on behalf of the Department of Defense,” McCormack said.

The Russians have decided to resume “some of their long-range aviation flights” using material left over from the Cold War and were keeping “them in good, working order,” he said

“But beyond that, I don’t think we view it as a particular threat. It is something that we watch, it is something that we watch closely,” he said.

Some members of Congress raised concerns about the incident, however, at a hearing with senior Pentagon officials.


329 posted on 02/13/2008 4:35:33 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
Last quote (somewhat more interesting, at least, to me):
"Now what we're concerned about is, what are the indications of this return to a Cold War mindset -- what are the implications of that activity and how do we best address that?

"We're just trying to now go back and look what message was intended by this overflight," he said.


330 posted on 02/13/2008 4:37:05 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Truly worthy of du, wny don’t you post over there? Over here even if we disagree with Bush, (as I do on Mexico),we still refer to the Republican President of the United States with respect.


331 posted on 02/13/2008 7:10:41 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (God Bless George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
My Grandson is on the Nimitz. Looks like we are going back to the cold war again. The Ruskies need to be slapped down some how. They are checking out our electronic emissions.
332 posted on 02/13/2008 8:06:36 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

The Russian tyrant is continuing to probe and test the West, while preparing for total war against the West.


333 posted on 02/13/2008 3:38:40 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never 'free')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
train a few flight crews...

LOL. These planes, as useful as they may be as standoff AS and cruise missile carriers, are relics more than likely flown by old, deaf, ex-Soviet pilots.

The only training these senior citizens need is new flag recognition and to learn the new (or old) Russki National Anthem. They and these planes were bought and paid for 40 years ago!

I don't mean to knock their equipment ... a turboprop that can do better than 500mph ... with Moscow to Havana range ... they are a positive danger to the fleet because they can stand off many hundreds of miles and let fly ... with something! Unfortunately for the Russkis they have a huge radar profile and are so damned noisy they can be heard before they are seen.

334 posted on 02/14/2008 10:46:05 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Dream Tickets: Gore/Obama vs. Petraeus/Blackwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Thank you for the ping.


335 posted on 02/15/2008 12:49:18 AM PST by nw_arizona_granny (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1886546/posts?page=4972#4972 45 Item Communist Manifesto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-335 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson