Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian bombers intercepted near US Navy vessel (Tupolev 95 flew 2000ft directly over USS Nimitz)
ynet ^ | 02.12.08 | ynet

Posted on 02/11/2008 3:45:40 PM PST by Flavius

Edited on 02/11/2008 4:36:47 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Russian bomber aircraft approached a US Aircraft carrier in the Pacific on Saturday and were intercepted by American fighter jets, a US Defense official said on Monday...

Excerpt. Story continues: YNetNews



Update:

Google AP

Navy Intercepts Russian Bombers

By LOLITA C. BALDOR – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. fighter planes intercepted two Russian bombers, including one that buzzed an American aircraft carrier in the western Pacific during the weekend, The Associated Press has learned.

A U.S. military official says that one Russian Tupolev 95 flew directly over the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz twice, at a low altitude of about 2,000 feet, while another bomber circled about 58 miles out. The official was speaking on condition of anonymity because the reports on the flights were classified as secret.

The Saturday incident, which never escalated beyond the flyover, comes amid heightened tensions between the United States and Russia over U.S. plans for a missile defense system based in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Such Russian bomber flights were common during the Cold War, but have been rare since.

The bombers were among four Russian Tupolev 95s launched from Ukrainka in the middle of the night, including one that Japanese officials say violated their country's airspace over an uninhabited island south of Tokyo.

U.S. officials tracked and monitored the bombers as two flew south along the Japanese coast, and two others flew farther east, coming closer to the Nimitz and the guided missile cruiser USS Princeton.

As the bombers got about 500 miles out from the U.S. ships, four F/A-18 fighters were launched from the Nimitz, the official said. The fighters intercepted the Russian bombers about 50 miles south of the Nimitz.

At least two U.S. F/A-18 Hornets trailed the bomber as it came in low over the Nimitz twice, while one or two of the other U.S. fighters followed the second bomber as it circled.

The official said there were no verbal communications between the U.S. and the Russians, and the Pentagon has not heard of any protests being filed by the United States. Historically, diplomatic protests were not filed in such incidents because they were so common during the Cold War era.

This is the first time Russian Tupolevs have flown over or interacted with a U.S. carrier since 2004.

In that incident, a Russian Tupolev flew over the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk in the Sea of Japan on Jan. 29, 2004. Since then, however, relations between the U.S. and Russia have deteriorated to their worst point since the Cold War, largely due to the United States' plans to put a radar system in the Czech Republic and 10 missile defense interceptors in Poland.

The U.S. has defended the plan as necessary to protect its European allies from possible attacks by Iran. But the Kremlin has condemned the proposal, saying it would threaten Russia's security.

"We are being forced to take retaliatory steps," said Russian President Vladimir Putin, who also warned that a new arms race is under way.

Japan, meanwhile, filed a formal protest with the Russian Embassy in Tokyo after Saturday's incident, saying that one of the Russian bombers crossed into Japanese airspace for three minutes. Russia has denied there was an intrusion.

AP Google


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Russia; US: California
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bmd; cccp; coldwar2; communism; missiledefense; navair; putin; redairforce; redjihad; russia; securitybreach; sovietunion; usa; ussnimitz; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-335 next last
To: cva66snipe

If people today knew the cat and mouse games that our Navy and Air Force played with their navy and air force back then, they would go pale. I have read and heard some tales from guys who were in the Air Force during the Cold War and they have some hairy stories to tell. I have known a number of ex-sailors who have had tales like yours to tell. The miracle is that these shenanigans did not turn into a shooting war.


201 posted on 02/11/2008 8:59:06 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
We now have better toys than the SR-71.

Hopefully, but even if we do, a recon bird isn't going to do much more than make 'em dirty their drawers ... Although that might be worthwhile in and of itself.

202 posted on 02/11/2008 9:00:55 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The Russians are starting to act like the Iranians talk.


203 posted on 02/11/2008 9:01:48 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Okay ... you’re welcome .. ;)


204 posted on 02/11/2008 9:03:00 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

When were you in the USAF? What was your MOS?


205 posted on 02/11/2008 9:03:40 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I think I’m with you .. but others
in the Navy say this happens all
the time in int’l waters. What to
think .........


206 posted on 02/11/2008 9:03:50 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Once again you've demonstrated your lack of practical military experience by your silly rant. This is the resumption of a game of cat and mouse that both sides played for many years. Your hysteria is yet another example of why anyone placing any credibility in your fiction is wasting their time. Thankfully our professional military has a system in place to weed out emoters like you before they instigate international incidents.

United States Department of Defense photograph of an F-8 Crusader intercepting a Tupolev Tu-95 Bear-A/B over USS Oriskany (CVA-34) dated May 25, 1974.

207 posted on 02/11/2008 9:04:48 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Never said that we shuld start a shooting war, simply said that we should intercept them earlier.


208 posted on 02/11/2008 9:05:26 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The obvious thing about that picture (circa 1974) is that they are still flying their plane, but we aren’t.


209 posted on 02/11/2008 9:07:57 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
I find it interesting that Pooty is so apoplectic about a defensive system. The ABMs are designed to destroy inbound missiles. Ask yourself, Pooty, where do the Europeans think those potential inbounds may originate? You or you pal Amadinnerjacket’s nutball regime?
~~~
IMHO : Pooty et al know that the ABMs take away a part of

their weapons abilities,,,that’s given,,,

Northern Iran Launch : ABMs in the Ukraine/Belarus will

protect Moscow just as much as the EU/etc.

“You Have To Let Me Shoot YOU!”,,,(smack~up~side~the~head)

LOL;0)

210 posted on 02/11/2008 9:08:00 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
If people today knew the cat and mouse games that our Navy and Air Force played with their navy and air force back then, they would go pale. I have read and heard some tales from guys who were in the Air Force during the Cold War and they have some hairy stories to tell. I have known a number of ex-sailors who have had tales like yours to tell. The miracle is that these shenanigans did not turn into a shooting war.

Half the time we didn't even know it was going on. The Operations guys did some we heard about some we didn't. Generally if things got tense on a carrier you found out quick. My first Captain had been there and done about all including a long stint in Hanoi Hilton. The most upset I ever heard him get wasn't over anything Russia done. It was because we drug anchor in the middle of a straight line storm in the Adradic a half mile off Dubronik and were headed to the beach. When the Captain uses the 1mc {main PA system} to give out orders such as get this ship underway get it underway now all engines reverse one third, hoist anchor and get underway, you know things are deadly serious. Of all the buzzing and games that really was our closest call for the ship while I was in.

211 posted on 02/11/2008 9:09:23 PM PST by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Awesome pictures and stories to go along with them


212 posted on 02/11/2008 9:11:14 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (Our memories remind us, Maybe road life's not so bad...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955
As an Air Force lieutenant general said to me, the days of the slow bomber being a military tool —beside cruise missiles—is over.

News to the Taliban I'm sure. Or to the folks under those 40 or so JDAMs dropped on about as many "safe house" type targets in just a few minutes.

But be that as it may, the Bears have cruise missiles. One of them very fast. And reasonably long ranged.

213 posted on 02/11/2008 9:11:27 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
There was no irrationality...and there was no rant.

Simply said that we should intercept them ealier and I stand by that. The picture you showed does not show a direct overflight at 600m, it shows a flight at a couple of miles and several thousand feet. Which, back when the F-8s were intercepting them, represented a much different scenario because the danger from cruise missiles was not what it was later, or is today.

Anyhow, you clearly have a personal issue as regards me...and that is fine. But I stand by the statement that a direct overflight at 600m is not a good thing.

214 posted on 02/11/2008 9:11:56 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
“You Have To Let Me Shoot YOU!”,,,(smack~up~side~the~head)

That seems to be Putin's line of thought. Also, he seems to think of Eastern Europe as Russian property.
215 posted on 02/11/2008 9:11:56 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Paranoia is a trademark of Russian culture. Its part of the national psyche. Ask anyone that knows anything about the Russians. Their history and political heritage are tied into fending off invaders. Some of the more notorious invaders were Napoleon and Hitler in recent history. Before the Europeans it was the Mongols. The Russian culture is much older than the Soviet Union. And their history is littered with bloody invasions. During the periods of their history when they weren’t fighting off foreign armies, they were busy killing each other in bloody civil wars. Russian history is a long story of bloody invasions and extremely violent social upheaval.

Their paranoia can play to our advantage though. I like to think that those in charge know what they are doing and are provoking this behavior with good reason. Based on the shape of our intelligence agencies and upper echelon officers, I’m afraid we are not intentionally seeking this response.


216 posted on 02/11/2008 9:14:25 PM PST by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Personally, I think the Russians were playing the old cold war game but with a new twist. I would hazard a guess that the TU-95 was loaded to the brim with surveillance equipment just waiting for us to paint them with our newest radar system. So they get to brag about getting close to our carrier AND they get a look at our goodies. (Which, Given current doctrine, wouldn't be used until something truely hot was going on. The really good stuff remains hidden so to speak)

Nice try Pooty.

217 posted on 02/11/2008 9:15:26 PM PST by Explodo (Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
a Russian plane flying over one of our carriers in the middle of the Pacific is not. (an act of war).

But the generally accepted rules of the road do make it a hostile act. The ship's crew has no way of determining intent. Thus it's best to give a wide berth to ships, especially warships, of a competing power.

It's short of like a guy on the street pointing a gun at you, "out of the blue" with no verbal or other hostile signals. He's probably not going to shoot you, but then again, how can you know? And can you afford to take the chance that he's not?

To some extent the evaluation of the event would require knowledge of what the ESM systems were picking up. If the Bear has his radar on, and especially if it was in targeting/tracking mode...well that would make me very nervous if I was the air defense commander of the task group.

218 posted on 02/11/2008 9:20:57 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
A former pilot called in to one of our local talk shows today. He said this kind of stuff goes on all the time all over the world. They (whoever) photograph our stuff, we photograph their (whoever) stuff. We time their responses, they time ours. etc. etc.

During hot, medium or cold wars.....this is nothing new....only the Natalie Holloway School of Journalism rising to great heights since the end of the cold war makes everything happening on the high seas look like an act of war and the beginning of the end of life as we know it on this planet.

Leni

219 posted on 02/11/2008 9:25:12 PM PST by MinuteGal (Mitt and Fred are Still My Guys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas
. Actually, it was too close to sink it.

But the one circling at 58 miles was not. (probably actually reported as 50 nautical miles and our friendly journalist converted it statute miles, making it overly precise in the process)

220 posted on 02/11/2008 9:25:33 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-335 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson