Posted on 02/08/2008 7:15:11 AM PST by meandog
I am constantly amazed (and annoyed) when the Right claims that the US has been hijacked by the Left over the past few decades. This is utter nonsense - the actual evidence indicates that we've moved far, far to the Right.
Consider the case of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the 34th President of the United States (1953-1961), Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during World War II, and a Republican. Funny thing is, by today's standards, Ike would be a flaming liberal, to the Left of all recent serious contenders for the Democratic Party presidential nomination.
Ike on Taxes First, a quick definition of earned income vs. capital gains.
Earned income is income made from a job.
Capital gains, in contrast, is money made from the appreciation in value of something one owns (assets such as stocks, property, art, ...), rather than money earned from a job.
Average folks gets most of their income from their jobs, and thus the tax rate on earned income is most important to them. Rich people get most of their income from the appreciation of assets, and thus the tax rate on capital gains is more important to them.
Earned Income Tax: Ike's Time vs. Our Time
The highest tax bracket on earned income today is 35%. During Ike's administration, the highest tax bracket was 92% in 1953, and 91% thereafter [1]. Yes, taxes on the Rich were almost three times higher under the Republican Eisenhower compared to our current President, or compared to the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton!
Capital Gains Tax: Ike's Time vs. Our Time
It is considered to be almost the gospel today that capital gains should be taxed at a far lower rate than earned income. Today the maximum capital gains tax rate is a whopping 15% on assets that have been held for at least a year since purchase. This is why the middle class, who are dependant on earned income, effectively pay taxes at a higher rate than do the wealthy.
In Ike's day, capital gains were not treated differently from earned income, so the rich paid 91% tax on capital gains. From 91% to 15% - another reason why it's good to be rich!
Note that in 1955, in the middle of Ike's presidency, the typical (median) family paid less than 20% in all taxes [2]. By 2003, the total of all taxes paid by a typical family had more than doubled, to almost 40% of income.
So in Ike's day, the rich paid a lot of taxes, the middle-class paid a little taxes, and somehow it all worked out.
But Did Ike Want To Tax The Rich?
You might be curious as to whether Ike actually wanted such a high tax rate on the Rich, or was somehow forced into it by, say, a Democratically-controlled Congress. It turns out that when Ike ascended to the Presidency, both houses of Congress were indeed controlled by a single party - the Republican party. Republicans controlled the Presidency, the House, and the Senate - they could have done anything they wanted. And some in Congress did pressure Ike to roll back taxes on the rich, but he held the line, saying:
"We cannot afford to reduce taxes, reduce income,until we have in sight a program of expenditure that shows that the factors of income and outgo will be balanced."
Ike on Defense Ike was one tough hombre, the toughest of the tough. As Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, he had led millions of troops to take back Europe from the Nazis, and he got the job done. An astonishing feat, an honest "Mission Accomplished". Ike was President during the early part of the Cold War - a war where our opponent had actual weapons of mass destruction pointed at us. Let's see some of the things that Ike had to say about war, the millitary, and... Halliburton. Would Ike's views be considered to be Liberal or Right-wing today?
On the millitary in general "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms in not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense."
On the Iraq War "All of us have heard this term 'preventative war' since the earliest days of Hitler. I recall that is about the first time I heard it. In this day and time... I don't believe there is such a thing; and, frankly, I wouldn't even listen to anyone seriously that came in and talked about such a thing."
On Halliburton "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
Ike on the Labor Movement We'll let Ike speak for himself on this one:
"Only a fool would try to deprive working men and working women of their right to join the union of their choice."
" . . . Workers have a right to organize into unions and to bargain collectively with their employers, and . . . a strong, free labor movement is an invigorating and necessary part of our industrial society."
and while we're at it:
"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
Ike and Socialized Medicine
In 1960 Eisenhower signed into law the Kerr-Mills Bill, generally considered to be the forerunner of Medicare. For the first time, Kerr-Mills provided for government payment of medical bills of 70% of citizens aged 65 and older. When was the last time you heard of even a Democrat suggesting an expansion of socialized medicine?
Ike And Unilateralism Eisenhower knew the value of working closely with allies, and specifically of working out problems peaceully through the UN. While the Right would have you believe that the UN is some sort of recent liberal plot to displace the US, the reality is that the UN grew out of the alliance of 26 nations forged to fight the axis powers in WWII. Eisenhower was, in effect, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe for the United Nations. For example, when President Truman announced the surrender of Germany he said “General Eisenhower informs me that the forces of Germany have surrendered to the United Nations”.
Here, again, are Eisenhower's own words:
"The world must learn to work together, or finally it will not work at all."
"If the United Nations once admits that international disputes can be settled by using force, then we will have destroyed the foundation of the organization and our best hope of establishing a world order. "
"The people of the world genuinely want peace. Some day the leaders of the world are going to have to give in and give, it to them."
He was my grandmother’s favorite President. I have a soft spot for him because I loved her so much.
How old is Say’s law?
_________________________
It still took well over 100 years for anyone to connect the free market dots explicitely and come to the common sense conclusion that at some point reducing taxes can increase revenue. Everyone should have seen it . . . it’s obvious in retrospect.
I suspect he would have ended up slapping a few congresscritters.
I am posting this because Ike reminds me a lot of John McCain
Agreed in part....
But not in this area:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenhower_Administration
On June 17, 1954, Eisenhower launched Operation Wetback in response to increasing illegal immigration to the United States. As many as three million illegal immigrants had crossed the U.S. Mexican border to work in California, Arizona, Texas and other states. Eisenhower opposed this movement, believing that it lowered the wages of American workers and led to corruption. The Immigration and Naturalization Service sent back to Mexico about 80,000 immigrants.
Also, we know that Armistice Day was changed to Veteran's Day by Eisenhower after he became President. It seems likely that Eisenhower had a high regard for veterans.
He could have fired him too...but he didn't. He saw great potential in Patton...the same that Grant saw in Sherman and Lee in Jackson.
Yes, and nepotized Navy Captains don't make good conservative senators much either, apparently.
Ike got five stars.
John McCain got none. Of course, he was missing 5 1/2 years worth of fitness reports.
That would be JFK, right?
Clearly, this statement of hope and warning has not been heeded. The UN General assembly is a polyglot of tin-pot dictators , radical islamists, and nations who hate the US simply because they are threatened by the freedoms we represent.
That said, don't you suppose that if President Eisenhower was alive today he might have seen things differently.
Most of us are appalled at the fraud, waste and abuse of power in Washington DC and are trying within our means to do something about it.
Remember the power equation: The Power equation: People who have power will not let go of it; people who want power will do most anything to get it This leaves us with the state of affairs we have today.
In the context of the past, we have to live with the choices and policies made in post Eisenhower history. When Johnson unexpectedly became president, he came with a lot of "baggage" He was a manipulative man with a "big government" bent. This resulted, over time, in the migration of the Republicans to the right as a counterbalance. Should this have happened? One can speculate about other scenarios, but what we have is what we have.
I suspect things are going to get a lot worse regardless of who is inaugurated in January.
Is Senator McCain the answer? I guess we'll have to wait and see.
It wasn't the culture that was different it was the world economy. The US manufacturing base was the only one left worth a damn. All of Europe was in ruins and Japan was just getting back on its feet. The US had no competition to speak of. The dollar was "all mighty".
When Kennedy reduced the tax rates it produced a surge in the economy that yielded more revenue to the government and was the source of funds for all the "Great Society" programs. ( Most of which were/are a complete waste of money)
Why not go back to pre-FDR days and see how things compare today with the days before that old socialist got into power.
Check out # 30...I was there before you!
A liberal? The John Birch Society used to call him a fellow traveler.
The writer is playing tricks with the reader by manipulating numbers. The 90% top tax bracket is misleading because it was easier to find deductions, hide income and avoid taxes. Meanwhile, he doesn’t compare this number with the rate for the middle class tax brackets, but rather the total amount paid from the middle class as a percentage of income. This proves nothing because he doesn’t use the same numbers. THere is probably a reason the author used this slight of hand.
LOL . . . yes! IQ of 125 apparently trumped Ike’s monster brain. Although JFK may have been hung over so that would skew things a bit . . .
Ike was no McCain. Ike was smart and modest. U uniformed.
Ever hear the name Andrew Jackson?
And the libs -- and Ike -- were right about Jim Crow.
That was the consensus at the time.
Evan as a general, Ike was more an administrator than either ideologue or military genius - but he was a good administrator. He, like the country, was coming down from WW2; the country needed a good administrator without huge doctrinare ambitioons. In that light he probably WAS the right man at he right time.
Another poster noted: "Funny thing is, by today's standards, Ike would be a flaming liberal". OK, times change and someone else correctly noted that by today's standards, JFK was a flaming conservative.
As to being the right person at the right time - this time around we will be doing without.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.