And, no, he isn't better than McCain any more that Arnold Schwarzenegger was any better than a Democrat in Calfornia.
Romney has the MOST liberal record in the race and is just as untrustworthy as McCain.
Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
How about this...
How about if Romney decides to give John “The Inevitable” McCain a dose of his own dirty tricks medicine, drops out of the race, and tells ALL of his people to vote for The Huckster.
That would cause McCain’s butt-boy use of The Huckster to backfire, and that sub-intellect from Hope would suddenly find himself THE choice of conservatives (like it or not), and with a lead in delegates, to boot!
Would I rather have Huckabee as my candidate instead of McCain? Well, that’s like asking if I would like Chicken Pox rather than the Measles... but, YES. I’d LOVE to see McCain defeated.
Oh please. Completely hysterically hypocritical of YOU to accuse anyone of drinking the kool aid. The ONLY way anyone can still be supporting Mr "Apologies to Pakistan for Bhutto getting wacked" Huckabee is if they are drowning in the kool aid.
Your boy has the fewest delegates, cannot win any of the remaining states, has total crap for a political organization, has no money, is finishing dead last in the polls with NO support anywhere in the Conservative media.
Huckabee has ZERO chance of beating McCain. NONE.
Utterly amazing after listening for decades to Christan Conservatives complain about the Republican Establishment bigotry towards them, to watch them turn around an express the same bigotry for a candidate based on nothing but his religious views.
Romney cut taxes; Huckster raised taxes 21 times, a net tax and spend increase.
Romney vetoed in-state tuition and benefits for illegals; Huckster supports them.
I suggest you go to factcheck.org and find out the Huckster’s actual record.
bull
Mitt has had a year to “get going” and has proven over and over again to be a colossal dud as a national candidate. Unless something serious healthwise happens to McCain, he’s the nominee.
> Poll after poll after poll shows Huckabee voters would
> split toward McCain not Romney.
I have a LOT of trouble believing these polls.
EVERY Huck voter I know, and I know a LOT of them, is a FAMILY VALUES voter!
Every one of them think of McCain as ANTI-FAMILY!
They correctly assess McCain as pro-tax, pro-amnesty, anti-constitutional, weak on abortion, weak on gay marriage, and a traitor to conservative causes. When McCain could make the difference for conservatives, he ALWAYS helped the liberals instead!
They KNOW these things!
Not a ONE of them would vote for McCain.
Some would write-in a more palatable candidate. Some would stay home. But MOST of them, the overwhelming preponderance of them, would break for Romney!
The reason they voted for Huck is they didn’t give Romney’s conservative epiphany much credibility. It was a tad late in the game for that.
However, the more Romney stays the conservative course, the more he hammers home his convictions and his strong family values orientation, the more of the Huck voters I know will vote for him.
O boy; another huck bot.
“Good grief, the Mitt Wits are DELUSIONAL. Poll after poll after poll shows Huckabee voters would split toward McCain not Romney.”
Do you think evangekical Christians take any stock in what James Dobson has to say?
If so, he said today on Glenn Beck that he is strongly against John McCain.
“DELUSIONAL”
Is a good name for people still touting Huckabee.
Huckabee has no chance in two or three man race because he is lying, flip-flopping Arkansas liberal.
Huckster is the least ethical has the MOST liberal record in the race and is just as untrustworthy as McCain.
Stop drinking the Kool-Aid. Stop supporting Huckabee.
Romney has not demonstrated a comittment to a specific, anti-Conservative agenda the way that McCain has. A lot of what Romney did as governer was the result of compromises with a solidly Democartic legislature. A comparison would be what Clinton did with the Republican Congress. Romney did a bit of trangulation as well. Furthermore, he did not go as far as “Arnold” has done in California to accomodate the Democrats. As a “conservative” he does lean more to the libertarian wing, although he did move right socially on the stem-cell issue. NO Republican leader has really done anything to short-circuit the move toward universal acceptance of same-sex marraige.
I can’r say that like McCain he has worked against his own party so openly and so consistently. What I dislike the most is his stance on the tax-cuts, because his rhetoric was so “populist.”