Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

GREAT piece with GREAT answers looking forward!

Recieved by email from Williams...

1 posted on 02/01/2008 11:08:52 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: PlainOleAmerican

Didn’t the Huckster claim he lurked on Free Republic? Hey Huckabee! This means you!


2 posted on 02/01/2008 11:10:24 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Great Article, key sentence ...

The second factor is a broken primary process. McCain is not being nominated by conservatives or for the most part, even by Republicans. He is being nominated by liberal voters from liberal leaning states who hold the earliest primaries and vote to eliminate all conservatives from the race before “fly-over” Republicans get a chance to cast a single vote.
3 posted on 02/01/2008 11:11:45 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZULU; AmericanInTokyo; AuntB; Tennessee Nana; goldstategop; mkjessup; SunkenCiv

Ping!


4 posted on 02/01/2008 11:13:08 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (A voter wavering between wanting radical change and burning the damn place down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

McCain will seek to merge the GOP with the Democrats, a Unity Party. He might choose Lieberman as his veep


6 posted on 02/01/2008 11:14:12 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

How nice. So, where’s the link so we can read JB Williams latest column? A link would be nice, yes.


7 posted on 02/01/2008 11:14:54 AM PST by SatinDoll (Desperately seeking a conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

bttt


8 posted on 02/01/2008 11:15:07 AM PST by Guenevere (If you do not stand firm in your faith, you will not stand at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Luckily, I got an e-mail from the good ol’ GOP yesterday, asking me what I thought about certain issues.

I answered their questions, and added a few suggestions. I unloaded both barrels on ‘em.

I will not vote for whatever crappy candidate represents the GOP in November. They do not represent me, because I did not even get a chance to vote for a conservative candidate.

Stuff that in your ballot box, GOP!


10 posted on 02/01/2008 11:16:26 AM PST by Tex Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Only registered Republicans should be voting in Republican primaries and Republican primaries must begin in Republican strongholds, not Democrat strongholds up east. There should be no such thing as “open primaries."

Should it even be necessary to say it?

The one guy Republicans won't vote for is on the verge of winning the Republican primary. Conservative candidates, combined, could not total more than 12% or 13% of the vote. If you are a conservative you've just watched your party being hijacked. Either that, or we really are only 13% of the membership, which is a whole other problem.

12 posted on 02/01/2008 11:18:25 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Yet this is what the Republican Party leadership decided to do years ago...

This is the real story. The LEADERSHIP decided that the Reagan Revolution needed to stop. THEY sold us out because they don't WANT us in the party.

They have told us to go home. We are not wanted.

14 posted on 02/01/2008 11:18:57 AM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Republicans no longer control the Republican Party and as a result, they can not advance a truly Republican candidate though the current liberal leaning primary process.

I don't think he understands the difference between "Republican" and "conservative." They are not the same.

Republicans still control the process. The eventual nominee will still be a Republican. He just won't be a conservative.

15 posted on 02/01/2008 11:19:08 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

How the GOP has failed
1. failed to deliver on contract w/america
2. rolled over for dems when GOP had power
3. elected GW, he certainly has rolled over for the dems
4. Allowed GW to have second term w/same vp. Missed opportunity to place incumbent vp as front runner.

The whole county is having a big open party with out any
care for who is paying the tab or when it will come due.


21 posted on 02/01/2008 11:22:10 AM PST by blue_nova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

My March 5th Mississippi primary vote seems pretty pointless now.


25 posted on 02/01/2008 11:22:54 AM PST by Sybeck1 (McCain/Huckabee 08! Let's make Mississippi, Texas, and Utah swing states!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

This author nails it pretty good. The Republican party is broken, and it may have to “hit bottom” like an alcoholic who wakes up in a dumpster one afternoon before it can truly begin the road to recovery. McCain appears to be just what the GOP needs to “hit bottom”, and it may be best (shudder) for real Republicans to try to ride out a Democrat in the White House for four years and then get a conservative candidate for the ‘12 contest.

Personally, I will never vote for McCain.


27 posted on 02/01/2008 11:23:09 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
those who are fully conservative on all the above, thought Fred Thompson was the real conservative in the race.

Exactly.

28 posted on 02/01/2008 11:23:38 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Former FredHead, now a Mittbot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

The ten most Republican states in 2004 (a Republican year) were Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Alabama, Kansas, Alaska and Texas, in that order. Yet only one of these states has held a primary thus far, Wyoming. Before the rest will get a chance to vote, all Republicans are out of the race.
***Right there is the biggest clue to how party primaries ought to be run. That should be the ORDER of the primaries, based upon what the highest percentages of republican votes. Those states that have high percentages of republicans would encourage more turnout in blowout elections because the results count towards primary order.


33 posted on 02/01/2008 11:25:17 AM PST by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Please link his "last column": Time For Some REAL Straight Talk.

I'd like to know what he thinks is the short term solution.

36 posted on 02/01/2008 11:26:57 AM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican
I think Mr Williams has been reading my posts for the past few days. Parts of this are almost word for word.
37 posted on 02/01/2008 11:28:56 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

....The second factor is a broken primary process. McCain is not being nominated by conservatives or for the most part, even by Republicans. He is being nominated by liberal voters from liberal leaning states who hold the earliest primaries and vote to eliminate all conservatives from the race before “fly-over” Republicans get a chance to cast a single vote.......And that’s the reason I’m sick of this. A few months ago there’s no way in hell someone could have told me McAmnesty would be leading after the thrashing he got on amnesty! Thats why all those states moved their primaries up then????


43 posted on 02/01/2008 11:35:37 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

That’s a proposal to create a geographically regional party that will consistently nominate presidential candidates to the right of the general electorate.

In a parliamentary system, such a party can wield considerable influence by coalition.

But in ours, where a simple majority allows a party to set the agenda in Congress and the president is elected by a system that roughly mirrors the popular vote, such a party has to depend on the opposition to consistently nominate weak candidates and consistently do politically stupid things.

IMO the best such a party could hope for would be to find itself in the position of the “Dixiecrats”, and that only worked because racism was an electoral glue stronger that other sorts of self-interest - a situation not likely to be repeated on the basis of current issues.


48 posted on 02/01/2008 11:42:25 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PlainOleAmerican

How about this idea states get their primary date based on past election results. Those that had the highest Republican turn out in the last National Election go first and so on. Finally only registered Republicans can vote in the primaries.

I think we would see a much different result.


52 posted on 02/01/2008 11:44:16 AM PST by BubbaBobTX (I wasn't born in Texas but I got here as fast as I could.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson