Posted on 01/24/2008 5:17:01 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
Debate among the GOP presidential contenders. Live at 9:00pm EST/8:00 CST
You’re pathetic.
Well, he looks a whole lot better than Ron Paul.
lol.......the only thing he’s missing is a sweater tied around his neck. I prefer my men in a Stetson, Tony Lamas and a Carhart.
My heroes have ALWAYS been cowboys. Mitt reminds me of Dan Akroyd’s character in Trading Places....
SC Judges & WOT are my issues. He’ll have to do. If he doesn’t, I’ll be sure to let him know!
Maybe you should actually post the quote, if you are going to keep saying what you think he said. Provide the link, and people can see for themselves what he said.
I am not... The last drink that I had was a glass of wine with Christmas dinner. You mistake anger and passion for what is familiar to YOU.
LLS
LLS
So, what else have you got? You’ve gone negative and say Hilary already won. Thanks for nothing.
A catch 22, Mitt ‘s vices preclude making him the “guy” that you would like to have a beer with and chat, or a coffee with and chat with your friends about him.
He’s a good looking mug, has a decent family, but not the sort that “Joe Average” would hang out with...
I never said it was going to work.
“YOUR DUMB AND DO NOT KNOW IT!!!”
Ahem...
“YOU’RE DUMB AND DO NOT KNOW IT!!!”
Who is dumb?
LLS
Former Bushbots are still here.
I think you meant Bush sr.....I didn’t vote for him & Quayle was just one reason why.
I’ll never vote principles over strategy again......
Fred people + Romney people + Hunter people ( - Hunter himself = WIN.
Got reality?
Reagan had championed ideals for a decade before he was elected, he lost the nomination process twice...
In today’s politics, that is impossible, the money is too large to do that, so Mitt would have to compress his Ideals and do it fast.
I don’t know where to look for the video of “I paid for this microphone” but is is a hoot, Ronald Reagen was cheesed off when he said it he basically told GWB’s Dad to STHU...
THen stick to your own words.
I went after your post because you made a blanket statement asserting what Fred Thompson was saying about the debate. You have no idea what he is saying about the debate. You just made up what he was saying, based on what YOU were saying.
You stole his name to make your point.
I apologized for an off-debate post during the live thread, because the live thread is where we discuss what the candidates are saying, not side issues.
I don’t mind you having a passion, but I do mind when you put words in other people’s mouths. I have MY opinion of what Fred Thompson would say about the debate, and if I posted it I would label it as my opinion, but why should I have an opinion of HIS opinion?
If Fred Thompson wants to comment on the debate, he’s got a phone, and a bevy of reporters who will be HAPPY to take his call.
If he does NOT want to comment on it, he certainly doesn’t want you making up his statement for him.
That’s what I’m objecting to, and the appropriate response was “you are right, I should speak for myself”.
If I started posting MY views as if Fred Thompson said them, I’d get a lot more back than one person asking me to stop.
Bush cultists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.