1 posted on
01/24/2008 7:11:26 AM PST by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: jdm
Good Clinton, Bad Clinton?
2 posted on
01/24/2008 7:13:47 AM PST by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: jdm
“Hillary Now Having To Defend Bill”
Hasn’t she always defended him?
3 posted on
01/24/2008 7:13:51 AM PST by
sweetiepiezer
(Card carrying member of the Vast Rght Wing Conspiracy)
To: jdm
4 posted on
01/24/2008 7:14:07 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(What Would Hobson Choose?)
To: jdm
Hillary must learn to let Bill be Bill. It’s the only thing he knows how to do.
5 posted on
01/24/2008 7:14:19 AM PST by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: jdm
The whole purpose of the BJKlintons to have Obama talk about what the x pres is saying wrong is to get him off track, Klintons know if they get him talking about him, he won’t have time to talk about the issues...
I hope Obama sees this soon and ignores the Klintons and starts talking about the issues....I would rather run my GOP nominee against Obama than against the Klintons....
6 posted on
01/24/2008 7:15:01 AM PST by
HarleyLady27
(Vote for ME for President.....I will continue the war; solve health care; and cut taxes.)
To: jdm
THESE PEOPLE PLAN EVERYTHING!!!
As much as I dislike Dick Morris, he is right on this. Bill is acting as the distraction so no one is focused on Hillary. Have you noticed that since Bill stepped up in New Hampshire, she has been winning?
7 posted on
01/24/2008 7:15:29 AM PST by
TexasNative2000
(Is this tagline governed by McCain-Feingold?)
To: jdm
If I were Bill, I'd be watching my back.
Hildebeeste could rack up a lot of sympathy votes running as the po' widdle widow-woman ...
8 posted on
01/24/2008 7:15:46 AM PST by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: jdm
I can’t decide if Bill is doing this on purpose to take attention away from Hillary. Everyone is talking about him now, and not her. In the meantime, she gets to “charm” people and looks somewhat good in comparison.
9 posted on
01/24/2008 7:16:32 AM PST by
ChocChipCookie
(Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
To: jdm
She is defending what is appearing to be the UN-defensible......
10 posted on
01/24/2008 7:18:39 AM PST by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: jdm
This is becoming too funny. Hillary, the “Senator from Punjab,” and Bill, “I-want-to-see-Hillary-and-Obama-fight.” (I bet Bill has seen more than his share of mud wrestling, but I doubt Hillary was ever involved.)
17 posted on
01/24/2008 7:24:54 AM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: jdm
18 posted on
01/24/2008 7:25:28 AM PST by
McGruff
(Fred Thompson. The last hope for conservatism.)
To: jdm
"That's beneath the dignity of a former president," Leahy told reporters" I'm confused. Does the dignity bar get raised once you become an ex-President?
To: jdm
20 posted on
01/24/2008 7:31:47 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: jdm
i doubt it.
that’s part of the clinton scam.
afterwards, everyone wonders what happened.
21 posted on
01/24/2008 7:33:16 AM PST by
ken21
( people die + you never hear from them again.)
To: jdm
That's beneath the dignity of a former president Considering Leahy & Clinton have neighboring townhouses in the gutter that's rich.
Still, Billy Jeff long ago shed anything resembling dignity - and we got to go along for the ride.
To: jdm
My theory, Bubba is in a titantic internal wrestling match between his lust for power and attention and his fear of having a chastity belt slapped on him by Queen Hillary if she succeeds and becomes president. Can you imagine the life he would have in the White House? There is no way she would allow him to tarnish her moment of glory that she has deserved and is part of her birthright!
At the moment he appears to be more interested in sinking her ship than helping her. They are one messed up partnership. How the Dem voters could want these guys back in charge is beyond me.
To: jdm
32 posted on
01/24/2008 8:02:32 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: jdm
38 posted on
01/24/2008 8:25:37 AM PST by
Gritty
(The Clintons are angry because the voters are going for a smoother snake-oil salesman - Howie Carr)
To: jdm
C’mon, Cap’n. Don’t fall for this.
“Defend” Bill? This is just another way to get media coverage of their story and keep it going.
Check out Dick Morris’ analysis of what the ‘Toons are up to in S.C. and it will all fall into place for you.
The ‘Toons know that the more he turns purple, and the more she stands by her man, the more votes they get. That’s just the way it is. So they get up every morning and say, “We can do that.”
39 posted on
01/24/2008 9:28:17 AM PST by
fightinJAG
("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
To: jdm
there’s always good news out there ... thanks for posting it
46 posted on
01/24/2008 9:46:16 AM PST by
InvisibleChurch
(" Nobody likes weepy meat." -- Mayor Quimby)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson