Skip to comments.
Rohrabacher, Hunter call for agents' pardon
Wash Times ^
| 1/17/08
| Jerry Seper
Posted on 01/17/2008 11:37:31 PM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-210 next last
To: pissant
Would have saved them from Sutton and his kneepadders. And saved us, too! :-)
161
posted on
01/18/2008 10:00:42 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: calcowgirl
162
posted on
01/18/2008 10:04:06 PM PST
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: calcowgirl
That’s ok. The thread quickly declined when Pinocchio showed up to cheer for Johnny Sutton.
163
posted on
01/18/2008 10:15:36 PM PST
by
Pelham
(No Deportation, the new position of the Amnesty Republicans)
To: pissant
Which is hard to do with his head in the way.
164
posted on
01/18/2008 10:17:11 PM PST
by
Pelham
(No Deportation, the new position of the Amnesty Republicans)
To: Pelham
Did you say Pinocchio? ;-)
165
posted on
01/18/2008 10:17:55 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: calcowgirl
That’s the boy. I wonder if he dresses like that for Johnnie.
166
posted on
01/18/2008 10:22:39 PM PST
by
Pelham
(No Deportation, the new position of the Amnesty Republicans)
To: Pelham
I think that is Johnny Sutton’s weekend outfit. ;-)
167
posted on
01/18/2008 10:27:59 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: Badeye
Commutation of the sentence, not a pardon. Wow. We actually have some Freepers who are sane about this issue! My goodness.
To: calcowgirl
I’ll bet they are a cute couple.
169
posted on
01/18/2008 10:52:23 PM PST
by
Pelham
(No Deportation, the new position of the Amnesty Republicans)
To: calcowgirl; mjaneangels@aolcom; pissant; Pelham
What's the use of Congress rewriting the statute when the prosecutor has already taken it upon himself to rewrite it for them....?
The way Congress actually wrote the particular statute coupled with rulings from both the Appellate & Supreme Court(s) make it very difficult for any prosecutor to just prosecute any LEO that becomes overzealous in the apprehension of a criminal.
Again, this is precisely why Sutton changed the wording of the statute.
170
posted on
01/19/2008 12:28:28 AM PST
by
Cyropaedia
("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
171
posted on
01/19/2008 12:44:31 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
To: Bob J
There was no coverup...
The bosses of R & C were right there with them...
To: Bob J
“I can tell you this, there is no way I could shoot myself with a .40 caliber Beretta at close range and keep that bullet inside my body.”
You could be right about that although, bullets do strange things when they hit bone. Let’s leave it at that and assume the ballistics report provided to the court leaves no doubt.
These guys at least deserve a new trial with different lawyers. (that is if Sutton wants to put his ass on the line)
173
posted on
01/19/2008 5:04:45 AM PST
by
wolfcreek
(The Status Quo Sucks!)
To: Bob J
“How does your Glock have no safety?”
Once a bullet is chambered in a Glock, the gun is ready to fire. There is no mechanical safety although the trigger has what they consider to be a safety feature. It’s my Wife’s gun so, you might want to ask someone more familier with that feature.
174
posted on
01/19/2008 5:11:47 AM PST
by
wolfcreek
(The Status Quo Sucks!)
To: Bob J
175
posted on
01/19/2008 5:13:08 AM PST
by
wolfcreek
(The Status Quo Sucks!)
To: calcowgirl
No, I did not say that Congress could "undeclare" the law. Nor can Congress issue a pardon. What Congress CAN do, is to pass a law saying that "no federal money shall be spent" to keep these two agents in prison. Such a law is pending, and if passed, it would force the Bureau of Prisons to free the two men.
They would still be guilty. The law would still be there. But the two agents would be free. The cleaner result would be a presidential pardon, of course.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, "Snow, Ice, and Lame Tom"
A Freeper in Congress? act now.
To: Bob J; calcowgirl
ROTFLMBO after reading your #120 to flattorney:
One more thing, dont even think about going after me. This thread along with your ABOUT PAGE is being sent to my litigation attorney who will be getting off a nice note to your law firm. Did flattorney threaten you or is that PARANOIA I smell? And here I used to suspect you were just trying to protect a labor source that could be paid slave wages.
177
posted on
01/19/2008 7:20:04 AM PST
by
Sal
(Is Senator Kyl trying to rehab himself from Grand Betrayer status? I hope so but don't trust him.)
To: AuntB
From all indications, this sentence will be overturned at appeal. Perhaps then we wont have to have these silly discussions over the details which dont matter. What matters is Johnny Sutton charged these agents under a law he knew full well was not intended for and he had never charged any other LEO with.I totally agree with you except that I hope the conviction is overturned instead of just the sentence. That would leave the way open for crony hack Johnny Sutton to be subjected to the Nifong treatment he deserves--hopefully with similar results.
178
posted on
01/19/2008 7:31:59 AM PST
by
Sal
(Is Senator Kyl trying to rehab himself from Grand Betrayer status? I hope so but don't trust him.)
To: Sal; AuntB; calcowgirl
...I hope the conviction is overturned instead of just the sentence. That would leave the way open for crony hack Johnny Sutton to be subjected to the Nifong treatment he deserves--hopefully with similar results. And that was be called sweet justice.
179
posted on
01/19/2008 7:41:03 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
(I hereby declare my support for Duncan Hunter. 1/10/08; late to the party, but I have arrived!)
To: mjaneangels@aolcom
Sorry, i didn’t know exactly what you were referring to.
Once that law is passed, all R&C attorneys need to do is go to a Federal judge and have them issue an order for their release.
Simple as that.
180
posted on
01/19/2008 8:15:22 AM PST
by
Bob J
("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-210 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson