“Woo-hoo! You do realize that Luntz has all the credibility of Dan Rather, right?”
On FR, credibility is in direct proportion to whether the subject in question agrees with the poster. It’s not an objective measure. You’ve been here longer than me, you should know that!
What’s sad is all the personal attack against Ron Paul - as opposed to critique of ideas.
Paul haters: try saying, ‘here’s why he’s wrong’ not ‘hes a loon!’
“What’s sad is all the personal attack against Ron Paul - as opposed to critique of ideas.
Paul haters: try saying, ‘here’s why he’s wrong’ not ‘hes a loon!’”
Even the long, thoughtful posts are ad hominem. Doesn’t speak well for FR.
Paul haters: try saying, ‘here’s why he’s wrong’ not ‘hes a loon!
________________________________________________________
Y’OK
I dont hate Ron Paul so I get to say
Here’s where he’s a loon
is that better ?????????????????????????
Ron Paul god bless him, lives in a fantasy world, he’s right about all the issues if you live in the year 1800 when nukes didn’t exist and it took 3 month for the enemies armies to get here, now the enemy flies in on American Airlines and can be here in 5 hours.
I’m sorry but our borders must extend into friendly countries if they will have us.
I'm not a Paul hater.
I have seen numerous posts that have attempted to take his ideas to task, though. Invariably, the response has been something the effect "you're a Paul hater!"
It ends up being much easier to sum it up by pointing out that, although his ideas (many of them) sound good, in principle, they don't work in the real world-- at least, not anymore. In summation: He's a loon.