Posted on 12/31/2007 7:09:35 AM PST by ricks_place
Just shoot me. First, it was Sam Tanenhaus, conservative editor of the New York Times Book Review being put in charge of the News of the Week in Review section. That means one conservative will determine how politics,culture and ideas are covered in TWO of the most important sections of the supposedly liberal newspaper of record. Now, says the Huffington Post, the Times is set to announce that Bill Kristol will be writing a weekly op-ed column. That's Bill Kristol ,Fox commentator , editor of the the Murdochian agitprop factory Weekly Standard, George W. Bush's propagandist in chief, co-founder of the Project for a New American Century, relentless promoter of the war in Iraq , ideological bully and thug. This is the man who blamed american liberals for the Khmer Rouge and the Ayatollah Khomeini (!), who will say just about anything, however bizarre or illogical or wild or (I'm guessing) cynical, to push the only ideas in his head: everything bad is the fault of Democrats and never mind the question, war is the answer.
On Iran: The right response is renewed strength--in supporting the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, in standing with Israel, and in pursuing regime change in Syria and Iran. For that matter, we might consider countering this act of Iranian aggression with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Why wait? Does anyone think a nuclear Iran can be contained? That the current regime will negotiate in good faith? It would be easier to act sooner rather than later. Yes, there would be repercussions--and they would be healthy ones, showing a strong America that has rejected further appeasement.
On morning-after contraception: "I don't know, I came into Fox this morning and one of our younger colleagues who works here, a guy just out of college a couple of years, said all his friends in who are still college are very happy about this -- all his guy friends, his male friends who are still in college are happy about this. They have a wild night. Precautions aren't taken. The burden is now totally off them. They tell their girlfriend to go out and get this drug and no problems at all. And I don't think that's a very good thing for the the country."
On Sunni-Shiite hostility in Iraq and desire of shiites to set up a religious state:"pop sociology"
On Terri Schiavo: "After all, we are a 'maturing society,' as the Supreme Court has told us. Perhaps it is time, in mature reaction to this latest installment of what Hugh Hewitt has called a 'robed charade,' to rise up against our robed masters, and choose to govern ourselves. Call it Terri's revolution."
On John Kerry and the Osama videotape: "But the fact remains that Osama bin Laden is not neutral in our election. He is trying to intimidate Americans into voting against George W. Bush."
What ever happened to meritocracy? For Kristol to get a Times column--after being fired from Time magazine no less -- is as meritocratic as, um, George W. Bush becoming the leader of the free world. A pundit, even a highly ideological one like Kristol, has to be (or seem) right at least some of the time. But what's striking about Kristol is that he's has been wrong about everything! or did I miss the sound of democratic dominoes falling neatly into place all over the Middle East? And it's not as if he's a great prose stylist, either. At least David Brooks can occasionally turn a phrase. Kristol just churns out whatever the argument of the moment happens to be, adds jeers, and knocks off for lunch.
What this hire demonstrates is how successfully the right has intimidated the mainstream media. Their constant demonizing of the New York Times as the tool of the liberal elite worked. (Maybe it also demonstrates that the people in charge of the decision aren't so liberal.) I'm sure we'll hear a lot about the need for balance at the paper -- funny how the Wall Street Journal doesn't feel the need to have even one resident liberal, but fine, let's have balance. Let's have a true leftist on the oped page--someone as far to the left as Kristol is to the right. Noam Chomsky, anyone? (and why does he seem just totally out of bounds but Kristol does not?) Barbara Ehrenreich? Naomi Klein? Susan Faludi? Gary Younge? me?
Why do I think those phone calls will not be coming any time soon?
After calling him a propagandist, a bully and a thug, Pollitt gives vent to her outrage with a list of unobjectionable opinions that she imputes to Kristol in a tone better suited to accusations of witchcraft. These include:
According to Pollitt, these mild views are so outrageous, they disqualify Kristol even for the intended role of conservative foil on a liberal editorial page. The "fair and balanced" concept hasn't gotten much traction at the Nation.
Post 68 liberals versus pre 68 liberals, almost biblical but certainly very funny.
Great ! Kristol is a great intellectual !
I could do without Kristol. He’s not a real conservative.
Not a big fan of Bill Kristol, but it’s nice to see how worked up this is making wackos like this woman.
This should make for a nice cacaphony as lib heads explode nationwide. Jeeze, I didn’t realize Kristol had that many nicknames among the Lefties.
The New York Times may be the only place in America where people like Bill Kristol and David Brooks are considered "conservative."
Yep. It goes to show you that even “moderate” conservatives are viewed as “nazis” by the looney left. That’s why these people, if they ever get in total control, will literally squelch all free speech.
This is the man who blamed american liberals for the Khmer Rouge and the Ayatollah KhomeiniAnd he was certainly correct in that.
French professor Guy Milliere (fmr adviser of Reagan) with Bill Kristol in Washington
I wish Kristol was as conservative as she thinks he is.
Still, he’s better than nothing.
Kristol is a good neoconservative fighter in the WoT. It is rare in Washington these days.
Support him.
Oh, I support him (except on the frequent occasions when he irritates me).
“you write mah-velous,” Billy.
We'll be lucky if they stop at squelching free speech.
The MSM grasps for straws as it sinks into the quicksand of its own mendacity. Bye bye.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.