Pro-Gay Romney Upsets Family Values Leader

WASHINGTON – A prominent pro-family leader is urging fellow conservatives to withdraw their support for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney over his recent expressed support for a “sexual orientation” non-discrimination law.

Romney during an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” said he supports the contentious Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which adds “sexual orientation” to a list of federally protected classes that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

The bill upsets conservative leaders because it grants special protection to employees based on their “actual or perceived” sexual orientation. Moreover, it would force Christian organizations that oppose homosexuality to hire gay employees.

“Mitt Romney’s Christmas present to the homosexual lobby disqualifies him as a pro-family leader,” said Peter LaBarbera, longtime pro-family advocate and founder of the Republicans For Family Values website.

“Laws that treat homosexuality as a civil rights are being used to promote homosexual ‘marriage,’ same-sex adoption and pro-homosexuality indoctrination of schoolchildren,” he said. “These same laws pose a direct threat to the freedom of faith-minded citizens and organizations to act on their religious belief that homosexual behavior is wrong.”

The former Massachusetts governor responded on “Meet the Press” that ENDA “makes sense” at the state level. But LaBarbera warns that if Romney “openly” promotes homosexual agenda at the state level then he cannot be trusted at the federal level.

He pointed out that the state’s “sexual orientation” nondiscrimination law laid the groundwork for Massachusetts legalizing gay “marriage” – the first in the country to do so.

Moreover, the ENDA-like law forced Boston’s Catholic Charities to shut down its century-old adoption agency because it refused to place children in gay households against Catholic teaching.

“Given Romney’s extensive pro-homosexual record and willingness now to depart from principle on this crucial issue, should we trust a ‘President Romney’ not to reverse course again on federal pro-homosexual laws such as ‘Hate Crimes’ and ENDA?” LaBarbera posed.

In addition to the homosexuality agenda, pro-family leaders have also had reservations on Romney’s commitment to the abortion issue, which he only recently said he was against.

Well-known conservative leaders who have endorsed Romney include Paul Weyrich of the Free Congress Foundation; Lou Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition; Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law & Justice; and Mark DeMoss of the PR agency DeMoss Pond.

“Now some pro-family leaders – who have raised millions of dollars over the years opposing ‘gay’ activism – will need to explain how they can go on supporting an openly pro-homosexual-agenda candidate,” LaBarbera said.

The federal ENDA bill is opposed by Christian heavyweights such as Tony Perkins of Family Research Council, Dr. Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr. of High Impact Leadership Coalition, Alan Sears of Alliance Defense Fund, the Rev. Rick Scarborough of Vision America, and Colin A. Hanna of Let Freedom Ring.

President George W. Bush has also indicated he intends to veto the bill if it makes it to his desk.

What do you expect from a Massachusetts’s Rhino? Those nondiscrimination laws have nothing to do with reasonable policy and represent just another step towards silencing all who disagree with the deprived, unnatural lifestyle and behavior. We see it in Canada and even the beginnings in CA. Homosexuals and other sexual deviants are not happen to be left alone in the privacy of their own homes with their sexual desires. They want to march into the schools and force feed our children and intimidate the majority who disagree with them into submission. This is not civil rights this is an infection, an on going invasion trying to re mold the whole of society.

Even liberals should be alarmed but they spend too much time wearing their gay friends on their sleeves like trinkets. As if they were the latest piercing or tatoo fad. I suppose they can feel good about themselves for God knows one can not have sex in the privacy of their own home unless everyone endorses it and our children are trained in it. Live and let live is not acceptable when your goal is the right to pick up dates and have sex in restrooms and public parks. They are not satisfied to live in their own depravity for like the darkness it desires to create more of itself in the world.

The Mormon church though loony on many ideas is totally against the idea of homosexuality as should any Christian derivative. The bible is clear about such things from the very beginning. Also nature is clear about such things. Those who do not reproduce and are sexually dysfunctional are unfit.

Homosexuality is one of those interesting issues where if one is entirely honest in one’s evaluation of it then it quickly becomes clear that it is a behavior not unlike a form of retardation or a disorder. If we came upon a person who refused to put food in their mouth and proceeded to shove it up their rear end then we’d have no problem identifying the clear disorder of such an individual because a rear end is clearly not an eating orifice.

Homosexuality on the other hand receives special treatment because people seem to be entirely unable to see it clearly for what it is. It does not matter what causes it. Whether an organism is driven by desires out of its control or those which are totally by its own choice the behavior and the invalidity of it does not change.

Liberalism is surely a fatalistic beast. If we applied the flawed ideas that out of political convenience are applied to the sexually disabled(those who have incorrect desires to mate with things not fit for mating with) then we’d never try to correct deafness, blindness, or any malady of perception because to suggest such a thing would be considered bigoted because God created them that way.

We can go further and say that an individual can not be expected to set aside irrational desires because they arise from a brain and hormones created by God. So when such an individual has desires for children or kittens we should not be judgmental but should find the bit of good that is in everything for who are we to disagree with what God made.
I could go further with this line of thinking which leads us to the depths of hells and unspeakable conclusions.

We need to be careful what we take up as banners under the guise of civil rights because when those rights are merely the license for human depravity then to not agree becomes sacrilege to the dark religion whose converts will violently put down reason for the sake and justification of the most twisted and unnatural ideas. The hunger for attention and novelty and constant justification of our modern day sexual activist is the indication of a deep insanity that is being manifest not just through them because they are a symptom of the seams being strained. One can not continue to grow great political fictions that treat mankind to a public trough without a thought of who is filling it or what it is being filled with without the result being an increasing detachment from reality.

We see this is the great myths and deceptions of our time. The most recent being Global Climate Change. The depraved seek a God as sure as they denounce the idea of one that does not fit within the confines of their skulls. They instead of taking up the banner of sentient beings and choosing their destiny instead seek a return to the muck which has as much value as a chicken who seeks to return to the egg. Humanity needs to free itself from the navel gazing and myth making misanthropic ideas of the modern left. We need to grow, to consume, to aquire more resources and have more children. Indulging extravagant fictions of sexual dead ends and lost creatures who are uncomfortable with their status as a member of the human race is the path to sure destruction or at a minimum having chronic annoyances struck into law as we see today.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.