And they allegedly do that where, exactly? Give an example of something they're teaching which actually "fails to explain the evidence."
And actually, this is the whole point - they are teaching evolution as THE REASON TO NOT NEED A CREATOR.
No, they're not, although I suppose it might look that way to someone sufficiently steeped in anti-science propaganda. Instead, they're teaching it because it's an extremely well established and productive field of science.
The irony is, SCIENCE has been pointing to the existance of the Creator in every recent discovery of Universal origins and in the observation about the location of our Earth.
Again, an anti-evolution claim is made without a single supporting example. Gosh, how surprising. Give us your very best three examples, and we'll see how well they (and your credibility on this topic) hold up to examination.
Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.
Very accurate in your case. Most anti-theists will look at a boatload of evidence, and dismiss it, because they approach said evidence with the circular logic of their pre-existing prejudices.
I won’t give you three examples, but I’ll give you three books, written by scientists and investigative journalists (originally an atheist who had an open mind to evidence), which detail the scientific evidence pointing to a Creator.
Rare Earth
Privileged Planet
The Case for a Creator
Let’s see if the “afflicted with ignorance” wants to be cured.