Yah. Judges.
Can’t the judge be impeached?
The lawyers and judges here are using little known laws to take land from honest citizens that don’t even know their land ownership is at risk.
The moral of this story is that if you have a lawyer or judge living next door, and you live in Boulder, either run the scum off, or move.
“Something is rotten in Boulder.”
The whole ultra liberal city is rotten!
what did he do to actually adversely posess the wall?
I would be tempted to retaliate. Start trespassing, littering, spraying graffiti on the wall, walking the dog on the land, etc. Assert one’s own “adverse possession.” Of course, it would doubtless turn out that we peons can’t get away with what a judge can.
I won’t pretend to know the legalities or the details of this case
but I hope judges across America start to feel the heat of the ridiculous mess they have made of our Constitution
the Peoples Republic of Boulder
What better reason to be a judge than to abuse the peons?
This case, like the other one, is not even a legitimate adverse possession case. For her to make an adverse case, she would have to have proven that she had built the wall on the neighbor’s land, and defended it “openly” and “notoriously,” and had paid the taxes on the land and the wall for at least five years. Those findings are not noted.
The state attorney general needs to step in and get involved here. Soemthing is rotten in Boulder.
The story is terribly written. How did Yeager actually take possession of the wall for 18+ years? And doesn’t a single use by Krueger-Cunningham nullify any period of use by Yeager?
I saw that happen in a rural Iowa community a few years ago. A well known and liked doctor bought an old farm. He spent a lot of his off time there fixing and repairing and planned to build a house on it someday.
He had a neighbor that had an old trailer and some junk on a tiny piece of ground next to him and one day the neighbor fenced off a small plot of the doctor’s land and put a couple of goats on it.
The good doctor took pity on the family and let is slide and a few years later the neighbor claimed the land in court and got it. The doctor told me that if he had charged a dollar a year rent he would have legally retained ownership.
This stone fence grab however looks to me like it was bogus. Both neighbors should have had pretty much equal use of a rock fence.
I saw the issue decided the other way once, when a wire line fence was known to be only approximately on the property line. The neighbor claimed the fence and a hundred or so feet beyond. They surveyed and went to court and the survey ruled. The fence was as much as 50 feet off the surveyed property line in places.
In that case the neighbor land grabber lost and they built the new fence as much as 50 feet back into his corn field.
Taking a one foot wide land grab to court is pathetic.
The problem with the other case, from what I can tell, is that adverse possession should never have been found in the first place.