Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sue Bob
“When she heard that Yeager was using something called “adverse possession” to claim ownership of t he wall and thereby move the property line dividing their properties roughly one foot in Krueger-Cunningham’s direction, she said, “I didn’t really understand what it was all about.” “

The lawyers and judges here are using little known laws to take land from honest citizens that don’t even know their land ownership is at risk.

The moral of this story is that if you have a lawyer or judge living next door, and you live in Boulder, either run the scum off, or move.

4 posted on 11/22/2007 12:18:42 PM PST by passionfruit (When illegals become legal, even they won't do work American's won't do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: passionfruit
Actually adverse3 possession is a well known term among anyone in real estate. It basically means that if you can move in on someone's land and openly live there for a number of years without that person taking legal action to remove you, you can sue in court to just take the land. In this case her family "assumed" they owned the wall, trimmed the grass along the wall, and did all the things the owner should have been doing in maintenance of the wall. It ain't right, but it is the law.
6 posted on 11/22/2007 12:31:09 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson