Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medved on 'Redacted': 'It Could Be the Worst Movie I've Ever Seen'
NewsBusters ^ | 18 November 2007 | Dave Pierre

Posted on 11/18/2007 4:40:01 PM PST by infoguy

"It could be the worst movie I've ever seen" ... "[T]he out and out worst, most disgusting, most hateful, most incompetent, most revolting, most loathsome, most reprehensible cinematic work I have ever encountered." ... "It portrays the members of our Marine Corps in the most disgusting way imaginable." ... "This film is an atrocity. It is zero stars." ... "I honestly was close to vomiting when I saw the film." ... "It is a slander on the United States of America." ... "Everyone associated with this film ought to be ashamed." ... "Will it inspire future terrorists? Of course it will!"

That's prominent movie critic Michael Medved on the new film "Redacted." Lest anyone think that Bill O'Reilly's recent outrage over the film is an overreaction, Medved tells Bill, "It's worse than you think."

Johnny Dollar's Place has the must-hear audio.

The following is a partial transcript:

MEDVED: ... I am actually one of the few people in the country who has seen the new movie. It is called "Redacted" ... And let me just tell you, before I go to actually reviewing it: It could be the worst movie I've ever seen. I mean, the out and out worst, most disgusting, most hateful, most incompetent, most revolting, most loathsome, most reprehensible cinematic work I have ever encountered. This is having reviewing movies for more than 25 years. [It] covers a lot of disgusting ground, but none more disgusting than 'Redacted,' which portrays the Marine Corps, one of the finest organizations ever assembled by human beings, portrays the U.S. Marine Corps, as corrupt, vicious, racist killers and rapists ... (snip) ...

It portrays the members of our Marine Corps in the most disgusting way imaginable. They hang out in barracks, drunk or stoned, with Confederate flags all over the place. And the head Marine, who is the leading rapist and murderer, is a big fat guy, I mean, hugely out of shape, right - just the typical Marine (sarcastic) - Marines tend not to look like that - big fat guy, overhanging belly, cigar-chomping, loud-mouthed, sort of fair-complexion. His name is Rush. Nothing in movies is an accident. They're clearly trying to indict and smear Rush Limbaugh by saying that secretly he wants to rape and abuse 14-year old girls and murder them and then burn their bodies ... (snip) ...

The film is atrociously acted. It's incredibly badly done ... (snip) ...

Look, I never say this. I don't believe in boycotts. I don't. But I actually think Bill O'Reilly, I know has been going on about this movie even though he hasn't seen it. O.K. I've now seen it. Bill, Bill - hey. It's worse than you think.

This film is an atrocity. It is zero stars as far as I'm concerned. It's very much Rated R. I honestly was close to vomiting when I saw the film. I have seen a lot of unspeakable garbage in years and years of reviewing movies. Nothing quite like this. It is a slander on the United States of America. It is a slander on the Marine Corps. It is a slander on our troops. Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks, paid for this entirely. Now he elsewhere has given money to support the troops. I know he has. He ought to be ashamed. Everyone associated with this film ought to be ashamed. I will never see a Brian De Palma film in the same way again. This is a veteran Hollywood director. What is he trying to do with this kind of thing? Will it inspire future terrorists? Of course it will! Because it portrays the United States troops in Iraq as sick, murderous, deviant losers.

Ugh. Do yourself a favor. Avoid De Palma and Cuban's piece of filth and trash. This Thanksgiving, go see "Bella." It's a nice, sweet film, and it's great.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; briandepalma; commiefornia; depalma; hollywierd; iraq; ishtarnowsecondworst; markcuban; michaelmedved; moviereview; redacted; treason; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-209 next last
To: infoguy

Where are the Joseph McCarthy’s when we need them? Why is there no longer a House Un-American Committee? Why is there only an ACLU? Why? Why? Why?


81 posted on 11/18/2007 6:19:06 PM PST by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Well, that’s a new one.


82 posted on 11/18/2007 6:26:35 PM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing; dmw

I like the Mavs too...but watch ‘em at home, okay?


83 posted on 11/18/2007 6:32:36 PM PST by CaliGirlGodHelpMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

from the thesausrus for awful....

Main Entry: awful
Part of Speech: adjective
Definition: terrible
Synonyms: abominable, alarming, appalling, atrocious, bad, deplorable, depressing, dire, disgusting, distressing, dreadful, fearful, frightful, ghastly, grody*, gross*, gruesome, grungy*, harrowing, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrific, horrifying, nasty, offensive, raunchy, repulsive, shocking, stinking, synthetic, tough, ugly, unpleasant, unsightly


84 posted on 11/18/2007 6:33:42 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LittleBillyInfidel
The ‘’Rush’’ thing was soooo subtly BRILLIANT!!!

The ironic thing is that although Rush enjoys his stogies, he hasn't been fat in about as long as the time that Franken titled his book after Rush (or longer).

85 posted on 11/18/2007 6:34:44 PM PST by Tanniker Smith ("What are we doing tomorrow night?" "Same thing we do every night. Try to take over the world!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I don’t believe DePalm or Redford care if their anti-
American films do squat. It’s all about the twisted values
liberals have.

Of course it makes no sense to make these loser films.

The question here is why has Hollywood negelected the
heroic American film since they would make box office?


86 posted on 11/18/2007 6:37:56 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xp38

oops...thesaurus


87 posted on 11/18/2007 6:38:19 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Another movie bashing our military, how cutting edge!

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


88 posted on 11/18/2007 6:39:30 PM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

If I’m correct, this mess got some critical acclaim overseas.


89 posted on 11/18/2007 6:41:31 PM PST by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark
I don’t believe DePalm or Redford care if their anti- American films do squat. It’s all about the twisted values liberals have.

Of course not. They're making movies for the choir, not for the rest of America. Heck, they may not even have a clue that these two movies stink....all of their friends and E! channel sycophants will still fawn all over them because "they speak truth to power".

The rest of America collectively shrugs, but Penn, Redford, et al, will never have a clue.

90 posted on 11/18/2007 6:44:26 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

They don’t care about what we the American people think,only what they believe to be the truth. And they will make more money over seas. A boycott of hollywood is what is needed!


91 posted on 11/18/2007 6:45:54 PM PST by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: infoguy
I guess I'll avoid it. As I'll avoid any DePalma film, past (such as the Criterion Edition Sisters DVD) or future I might have been tempted to patronize.
92 posted on 11/18/2007 6:48:12 PM PST by Rocko ( "Where's the global warming? It's freezing in here." -- Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman
It was very well done and stunning to watch. The 3D was quite impressive

How is that done? Do you need to wear 3D glasses? Can you see it if you already wear glasses?

Thanks!

Mark

93 posted on 11/18/2007 6:49:21 PM PST by MarkL (Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tenniel2
Ebert has been an unrepentant lefty from the git-go. It’s annoying that he does know something about the movies, and infuriating that he really can write.

I used to like his reviews, before he became so political. I didn't necessarily like the films he liked, but his reviews were nonetheless informative. After he started writing about politics, though, his reviews started to be more about politics than about movies.

94 posted on 11/18/2007 6:58:41 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: All
Just a question:::

What if you bought your ticket, watched about 30 min of the movie and went to management demanding your money back? You could tell them you had no idea it was an anti- American film. If you knew they showed crap like that you never would have bought a ticket.

It would take up a seat in the theater, cause the manager some grief,( esp if about 100 people did it), and maybe get them to turn the film down next time. Remember Gibson barely found anybody to back his "Passion" film. He had to back it himself.

I've never tried to get my money back before, what do you think the odds are?

95 posted on 11/18/2007 7:03:44 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

The proof that our Marines are not as De Palma has depicted them in this movie is that he is still alive and kicking! People as amoral as the caricatures in his film would have fragged his Democrat Ass as soon as the reports on its focus were released. Lucky for him they are not as he thinks.


96 posted on 11/18/2007 7:06:37 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

I saw Bella. It’s a terrific movie.


97 posted on 11/18/2007 7:08:48 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
yikes if it makes “Santa Claus Conques the Martians” look good then De Palma is not just jumped the shark, he has jumped the whole aquarium.

It appears that De Palma has jumped the jackass!

98 posted on 11/18/2007 7:08:50 PM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ken21

I agree.


99 posted on 11/18/2007 7:09:34 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus

DePalma has spent his entire career trying to copy Hitchcock, unsuccessfully.


100 posted on 11/18/2007 7:11:57 PM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson