Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Tightening Mortgage Rules Wins Some Support
Market Watch ^ | 24 October 2007 | Robert Schroeder & Greg Robb,

Posted on 10/24/2007 8:32:08 AM PDT by Jacquerie

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- A bill that would require licensing mortgage originators and standards for subprime mortgages won support from two federal banking regulators Wednesday.

However, Federal Reserve Governor Randall Kroszner warned that any new legislation should not restrict responsible lending or securitization of mortgages. "Getting this balance right is particularly critical now, as many borrowers facing rate adjustments may need to refinance into more affordable loans," Kroszner said in testimony prepared for delivery. Kroszner said Congress should also not approve any measure that would have a "detrimental impact on the ability of lenders to securitize loans."

The House Democrats' legislation includes a measure that would let homeowners sue Wall Street firms for relief from mortgages that they could not afford. See earlier story.

Lawmakers are examining the bill Wednesday amid more bad news for the housing market.

Sales of existing homes and condos fell 8% in September to the lowest level in at least eight years, further evidence that the credit squeeze in mortgage markets is hurting home sales, the National Association of Realtors reported Wednesday. See full story.

Frank, the committee's chairman, said at the outset of the hearing that the U.S. is experiencing its worst financial problems since the late 1990s.

"We are in a serious crisis," the Massachusetts Democrat said.

Spencer Bachus, the top Republican on the panel, echoed Kroszner by saying that credit should be protected as lawmakers try to fashion a solution to the housing problems.

"The competing values in this case are the availability of credit on one side and protecting borrowers from sharp practices and unethical conduct on the other," said Bachus.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mortgage; subprime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
This bill will hurt the very people it claims to help.
1 posted on 10/24/2007 8:32:10 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Only wealthy need apply. Which of course will create a great opportunity for the Democrats to create some more mortgage subsidy programs.


2 posted on 10/24/2007 8:34:35 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Can I sue the government for paying taxes I can’t afford?


3 posted on 10/24/2007 8:36:32 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
The House Democrats' legislation includes a measure that would let homeowners sue Wall Street firms for relief from mortgages that they could not afford.

The problem with this is that the Wall Street firms, like John Edwards former Hedgefund employer is that THEY DID NOT ORIGINATE THE LOAN, NOR PROVIDE THE FUNDS FOR THE LOAN!!!

All they did was buy the loans later in the form of mortgage backed securities.

4 posted on 10/24/2007 8:37:22 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The originators were getting away with some of the most outrageous frauds in the last 2-3 years - just hoping that the loan would perform long enough to get out of the recourse period before failing. You should see some of the information in the bankruptcy filings of mortgage originators in the Atlanta area, they were making bunches of money, not setting aside reserves, and they just folded when a few lenders sought recourse.


5 posted on 10/24/2007 8:37:34 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Not breaking news.


6 posted on 10/24/2007 8:38:18 AM PDT by TheConservator ("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
This bill will hurt the very people it claims to help.

As the "subprime crisis" was pure horse [bleep] to begin with...

7 posted on 10/24/2007 8:39:09 AM PDT by BlabItGrabIt (Sometimes nuthin' is a real cool hand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

***The problem with this is that the Wall Street firms, like John Edwards former Hedgefund employer is that THEY DID NOT ORIGINATE THE LOAN, NOR PROVIDE THE FUNDS FOR THE LOAN!!!

All they did was buy the loans later in the form of mortgage backed securities.***

You are absolutely right! This is just another Dems ploy to help smarmy lawyers such as Edwards. So now Edwards can sue his own employers.


8 posted on 10/24/2007 8:43:51 AM PDT by kitkat (I refuse to let the DUers chase me off FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
(I refuse to let the DUers chase me off FR.)

Amen and AMEN from a catman...

9 posted on 10/24/2007 8:49:05 AM PDT by BlabItGrabIt (Sometimes nuthin' is a real cool hand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Of course when fraud by appraisers, realtors and brokers was going wild, affordability was evaporating and billions were being loaned based on fairytale “equity”, there was of course no problem, no “crisis”.......


10 posted on 10/24/2007 8:50:10 AM PDT by Notary Sojac ("If it ain't broken, fix it 'till it is" - Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

This provision will make these securities toxic. I think that is the rat plan. The federal government will be forced to buy the loans and subsidize the borrowers. Maybe the federal government can lower the interest rates to 3.4% just like student loans will become under the new student loan bill.


11 posted on 10/24/2007 8:52:04 AM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The government getting between actors in a free market. Allways a good thing.

/sarcasm.


12 posted on 10/24/2007 8:53:49 AM PDT by Leisler (RNC, Rino National Committee. Always was, always will be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
"let homeowners sue Wall Street firms for relief from mortgages that they could not afford."

I remember about 5 years ago driving around with my girlfriend down some streets with houses that cost more than 3 times what mine did.
She marveled at how big they were, and now nice they were.
With envy in her voice, she asked "How can so many people afford such expensive houses?"
My reponse was to explain how I viewed several important realities. One of them was simply that, "Some people make more money than us".
Another reality that I described was how some people "buy way over their heads". They borrow far above their means. They use tricks to do it, and they end up working extra jobs and trying to find other ways to pay their loans.
Because she seemed so filled with envy, I felt I could lift her spirits a bit by explaining a notion I had in my head.
I said "If the economy tanks... or if they lose their jobs... or if interest rates climb and they have adjustable rate mortgages, they are SCREWED!"

As cruel as a through like that is (real people getting screwed), it seemed to take on the feel of poetic justic. Afterall, we weren't the ones trying to borrow beyond our means. We weren't the ones taking such risks. We weren't putting ourselves in that position.

But I should have known better.
I should have known that they would probably get bailed out someday.
I should have done what they did.
13 posted on 10/24/2007 9:00:47 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
The House Democrats' legislation includes a measure that would let homeowners sue Wall Street firms for relief from mortgages that they could not afford.

Stupid, stupid idea.

While we all know some loans were given that shouldn't have been...how do you determine fault here? Sounds like something that could EASILY turn into another free-for-all lottery.

14 posted on 10/24/2007 9:05:29 AM PDT by RockinRight (The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Good question...


15 posted on 10/24/2007 9:07:21 AM PDT by RockinRight (The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: z3n

It also effects those of us who are investors (Mom and Pop investors too) as well as those of us employed in the mortgage origination business.

I don’t do the really exotic stuff, never did...but the market as a whole still affects my income. So far I’m doing OK and staying above the fray, so to speak, but it’s getting harder when the MSM and Congress seem bound and determined to take a situation which has already begun to correct itself on its own, and turn it into Great Depression II.


16 posted on 10/24/2007 9:10:12 AM PDT by RockinRight (The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Hey, you know that the basis of liberalism is to use government to force those who make responsible decisions such as yourself

pay for the consequences of those that make irresponsible decisions.


17 posted on 10/24/2007 9:10:40 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

“...when fraud by appraisers, realtors and brokers was going wild”

Wow! A lot of folks in cahoots, please document your expose. Will be great reading....


18 posted on 10/24/2007 9:15:53 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dakine

Don’t forget that all this will put lenders in a double-whammy situation.
The reason that the sub-primes were encouraged is to get voter support for the Dems. They set up laws that forced lenders to give subprimes or face discrimination charges.

Now they won’t be able to give the loans, but won’t be able to not give the loans.... I’d get out of the business altogether.


19 posted on 10/24/2007 9:49:53 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

You’re right — no one will touch sub-prime debt. Not that investors were eager to do so in the first place — after all, wasn’t that why they sub-prime ABS’s were rolled into CDO’s with higher-grade debt in the first place?

Now with the death of synthetic debt, pile this on, and what I said on other thread will come to pass: borrowers will need to have gold-plated credit ratings to get a mortgage at all.


20 posted on 10/24/2007 10:22:35 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson