Posted on 09/30/2007 10:01:27 AM PDT by wagglebee
Lovelle Svart woke up Friday knowing it was the day she would die.
There was much to do. Her family and closest friends would be gathering at 11 a.m. in her mother's apartment in the Southwest Portland assisted-living center where they both lived.
She directed trips to the grocery store and even called AAA to jump-start the dead battery of her 2006 Scion. She double-checked delivery of food platters from Fred Meyer: turkey sandwiches, strawberries and grapes, pretzels, almonds and sparkling water. There would be pink roses on the dining table and a boombox in the corner to play music, including the polka tunes she loved.
Lovelle made one last trip to "the bridge," a wooden footbridge in a nearby park where she had found quiet sanctuary the past few weeks as painful cancerous tumors spread from her lungs through her chest and her throat.
The consummate planner, she had choreographed the day. She wanted to leave time -- five or so hours -- for storytelling, polka dancing and private goodbyes. And at 4 p.m., she intended to drink a fatal dose of medication, allowed by Oregon law, that would end her life.
A smoker since age 19, Lovelle found out five years ago that she had inoperable lung cancer. Radiation and chemotherapy slowed the cancer's spread but could not stop it.
In June, Lovelle's doctor warned her that she was likely to die within six months, making her eligible for Oregon's unique, 10-year-old Death With Dignity Act.
What some call doctor-assisted suicide and others call physician aid-in-dying or hastened death is one of the most passionately argued issues in U.S. medicine and politics. Proponents frame the question in terms of personal choice, death with dignity and freedom from pain. Opponents say assisted suicide violates the Hippocratic tradition of "First, do no harm" and undermines the doctor-patient relationship by turning physicians from healers into accomplices of death.
Far more people ask for a lethal prescription than actually use the drug. Either their symptoms overwhelm them before they make a final decision, or they find other ways to control those symptoms, including pain.
Lovelle was determined to keep control, if possible, of when and how she died.
On July 1, she filled out and signed a one-page form titled, "REQUEST FOR MEDICATION TO END MY LIFE IN A HUMANE AND DIGNIFIED MANNER." By signing, she agreed that she knew the expected result -- death -- and was aware of alternatives, such as hospice care.
By law, she also had to make two oral requests at least 15 days apart. Her doctor wrote the prescription for a lethal dose of barbiturate in late July, and she had it filled Aug. 7. She kept the orange bottle of clear liquid in a plastic grocery bag on a stack of towels in her bedroom closet -- "hidden in plain sight," as she put it.
She was still unsure whether she would take the drug, but said she took comfort in knowing it was there.
Once she knew she had less than six months to live, Lovelle also decided to try to start a more open public discussion of dying. During the past three months, mostly through a series of online video diaries for The Oregonian, she shared publicly the experience of facing death.
Lovelle, 62, has "touched a chord" by chronicling her "deeply intimate struggle with mortality," said Dr. Susan Tolle, director of the Center for Ethics in Health Care at Oregon Health & Science University.
"People are following closely," Tolle said Friday. "They want to know what happens to her.
"Lovelle has become their friend."
Friday morning, Lovelle stuck a yellow note on the door of her mother's apartment: "Please Do NOT Disturb. Unless Urgent. Thank you."
She wore a blue sweat suit over a "Cancer Fighter" T-shirt.
Lovelle delighted in Friday's blustery weather and a forecast that included possible thunder and lightning about the time she planned to die. "Oh, the woo-woo crowd will have a blast with that," she said.
After AAA jump-started her car, she left the engine running to recharge the battery, returned to her apartment and set the kitchen timer for 10 minutes to remind her.
When a friend later expressed shock that Lovelle had spent part of the last morning of her life dealing with a dead car battery, Lovelle explained:
"The car goes to my sister. I didn't want it to be dead."
In the living room, her family and friends sat and told stories and jokes, sometimes with political references. Sometimes they laughed a bit too loudly, out of nervousness at the occasion. Twice, Lovelle came out of the bedroom where she was having private meetings to say, "No politics!"
A bit later, Lovelle and George Eighmey, head of Compassion & Choices of Oregon, an advocacy group that works with most of the Oregonians who end their lives under the Death With Dignity Act, danced a brief but rousing polka.
By midafternoon, the studiously punctual Lovelle was falling behind her schedule. No one complained.
But a little before 4 p.m., she decided it was time to make her final preparations. First, she had to take the two pre-medication pills -- to calm her stomach and control vomiting. They were hard to swallow, given the tumors in her neck, but she got them down with water.
"It" would be in about an hour, she told her family. Time now to sit alone with her mom, Vi Svart, in her bedroom for the last time. The rest of the group sat in the living room, debating whether they wanted -- and whether Lovelle wanted them -- to be in the room with her at the end.
Lovelle's three siblings and her mother, despite deep misgivings about her decision to end her life, supported Lovelle in her choice.
"I feel so at peace," she said. "I've had such a good time. . . . And today has been so wonderful.
"I'm really ready to go. I'm ready."
About 4:30, Lovelle announced she wanted "a hugging line" -- one last hug for everybody. "You'll be first and last," she said, turning to her mom.
Lovelle stood in the center of the living room and embraced them one by one -- long hugs with tears and laughter.
Then one last cigarette break on her favorite sitting stone next to the parking lot. Afterward, Lovelle took the elevator up to the third-floor apartment and hung up her coat and hat.
"OK," she said to no one in particular. "I'm going to get into bed now."
In many ways, Lovelle fits the pattern of Oregonians who choose to end their lives under the Death With Dignity Act.
Like most, she had cancer. She was in her 60s. Well educated and insured. Not formally religious. White. Enrolled in hospice care.
And fiercely independent.
"I could be very gregarious -- and very private," she said. "Very much the partygoer -- and very much want to stay home and read."
She was chosen Miss Cafeteria at Crater Lake Lodge in the summer of 1963, and she has the lemon-yellow rayon dress to prove it. She left it hanging in a plastic dry-cleaning bag on her bathroom door.
She loved surfboarding and polka-dancing and both her first and last names, "because they are different, and I like things that are different."
And she liked, as she was the first to admit, being in control.
Lovelle decided it was more important to die by taking the lethal drug while she had a degree of control over her body than to wait for nature to take its course. But how to decide when?
Her symptoms -- shortness of breath, stomach distress, weakness and pain -- were intensifying. If she waited too long, she would be unable to drink and swallow the lethal drug on her cupboard shelf.
Lovelle sought a shifty window between life-worth-living and incapacity, "this tiny bit of freedom" when, for her last act, she could swallow a fatal potion in the company of family and friends. "That's when I want to go."
Last Sunday, after a painful, restless night, Lovelle decided it was almost time.
Swallowing was more painful than ever, like choking on broken glass or razor blades, she said. She had barely eaten in two weeks. She started taking morphine to dull her pain.
She told family and friends to come Friday.
Lovelle sat on the foot of the bed, while 10 others gathered around. A photograph of Lovelle as a curly-haired 5-year-old stood on one bedside table; on the other were a glass tumbler containing the liquid medication, which looked like water, along with a container of morphine and Lovelle's ever-present mug of Gatorade. On the wall above the head of the bed were five more family photographs.
With some help, Lovelle yanked off her shoes and socks and slipped partway under the covers.
Eighmey stood by her bedside. He has attended more than three dozen deaths of this kind.
"Is this what you really want?"
"Actually, I'd like to go on partying," Lovelle replied, laughing before turning serious. "But yes."
"If you do take it, you will die."
"Yes."
Ever the detail person, she reminded him that she wanted her glasses and watch removed, "after I fall asleep."
Eighmey warned her that the clear liquid would taste bitter. She needn't gulp it. She would have about a minute and a half to get it down.
Lovelle dipped her right pinky into the glass and tasted.
"Yuck," she said. "That's why I need the Gatorade."
Holding the glass, Eighmey asked her again to affirm that this was her wish.
Yes, she replied.
Someone asked, "Can we have another hugging line?"
One by one, they came to head of the bed for hugs and teary whispers.
"Sweet dreams."
"It's all right."
"I know."
"Thank you for being my big sister."
"All the church is praying for you."
Lovelle was sitting up in bed, three pillows propping her up.
She held the glass tumbler in her right hand, raised it to her lips and drank. It was 8 minutes after 5.
"Most godawful stuff I ever tasted in my life," she said, making a face before taking a sip of Gatorade and plain water.
She laid back and scrunched down under the covers, glasses still on to see her loved ones.
She reached for her mother, who leaned closer, then laid down next to Lovelle, stroking her hand.
"Are you OK, honey?"
"I'm fine, Mom."
"You're not sick?"
"No. I'm peaceful. It stopped raining, the sun's out. And I've had a wonderful day.
Her eyes closed.
"It's starting to hit me now."
For a while, no one moved or spoke, as Lovelle drifted into a coma. Then Lovelle's mom asked for a prayer. Others spoke up with prayers and memories, which prompted other stories. Lovelle's brother Larry read part of William Wordsworth's "Intimations of Immortality."
Lovelle lay motionless but for the gentle rise and fall of her chest. Her heart slowed but didn't stop.
About an hour into the vigil, Lovelle's mom lit three white candles in cut-glass candlesticks in the living room. "She's still with us," she said.
Hours passed. Given what Lovelle's body had been through -- not only lung cancer but also open-heart surgery in 2004, Eighmey was surprised how long she was lingering. But not her family.
"I hate to say this," one said with a smile, "but this is just like her."
"A little spitfire," agreed another.
"Above average -- that's Lovelle."
"One last reminder that she's the one in control."
Jane O'Dell, a volunteer for Compassion & Choices, sat at Lovelle's bedside all evening, holding her right hand, monitoring her breathing and regularly checking the pulse in her wrist and neck.
About 10:30 p.m., more than five hours after she had taken the drug, O'Dell signaled that Lovelle's breathing had become shallower and more labored. Her pulse dropped, her skin turned pallid and her fingernails bluish. It was more than a minute between breaths.
Family and friends resumed their bedside vigil, and silence again fell over the dark room. Lovelle's chest stopped moving.
Eighmey leaned over at 10:42 p.m. and put his ear to her chest to listen for a heartbeat. He stepped back, shaking his head and spoke in a quiet voice.
"She's gone."
Not being one of you other-peoples-suffering-is-noble types, this sounds to me like a pretty fair way to go.
Wait until the people who brought us asssited suicide are running the medical system. You ain't seen suffering yet.
My agenda is to preserve the medical system in the history of the world legal systems of the greatest nation in the history of the world. If people wnat to kill themselves they should buy a shotgun instead of screwing with the systems that are in place to guard the health and freedom of myself and my descendants.
I’ve watched many of my family, including both parents and one set of grandparents, die of cancer. Have you ever seen it? There are no words to describe the horror and indignity and suffering of the tertiary stages of terminal cancer. You won’t understand unless you’ve seen it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what this brave lady did - nothing. She went on her own terms, bravely and with dignity. She saved herself, and her family, a great deal of suffering and bad memories and horror that they all could do without. I suppose you believe everything comes from an all-loving God, right? Does that include cancer and unspeakable suffering? You are absolutely wrong that life is always worth living - it certainly isn’t during end-stage cancer.
Is it possible to judge the action, without being smug about it?
This is one issue on which my emotions go very strongly one way, but my convictions go another.
And I simply have to go with my convictions. Otherwise, I’m God, making ethical calls on the basis of my own preferences. And I’m not.
but we cannot see both sides of the issue.
For those of us who are Christian, God may have lessons for us or others around us in those final moments. I do not like suffering, nor do I want to. But if living to the end will glorify God somehow or witness to another person who needs that witness, I would not take the easy way out for anything.
Ultimately, if you trust that your personal God and Saviour wants the absolute best for you and will give it to you no matter what, then it is pretty much a no brainer to trust Him to the end no matter what it looks like to the world.
Would it be sanctimonious to say that I sincerely feel what she is doing is a sin and has dangerous implications on society as a whole.
I don't appreciate the relentless attempts to numb society as a whole into thinking that perhaps under the circumstances this act is justified. It sets a very dangerous precedent. One that Americans and the United States seem to rushing headlong into.
The tactics here are the same as the proponents for abortion and homosexuality have used. I'm sorry but I don't pity this women. Perhaps you and other FReepers think I should but I don't. Sorry.
Yes, many times including watching a grandparent die of pancreatic cancer last year.
There are no words to describe the horror and indignity and suffering of the tertiary stages of terminal cancer.
Dignity is who a person is, not how they look as they are dying. Did Christ have dignity as He was on the Cross covered in blood and being taunted?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with what this brave lady did - nothing. She went on her own terms,
Precisely, she determined that she would play god.
I suppose you believe everything comes from an all-loving God, right? Does that include cancer and unspeakable suffering?
I'm confused, do you deny the existence of God or His love for us?
She chose the smart, and in her judgement, the right course of action (BTW: she didn't "swallow pills"; she couldn't, her throat was too constricted due to her terminal cancer - she took a liquid.).
And not to put too fine a point on it, how do you know that what she did was NOT god's will? Perhaps your definition of "god's will" is far too narrow, close-minded, and judgemental?
At any rate, she made a brave decision and I say, good for her!
If you have witnessed what I have, and insist that life is always worth it no matter how badly you are suffering, then I can only say that your religious superstitions are getting in the way of your humanity, re:compassion. I do not deny the existence of God (it is, however, given the utter lack of evidence, extremely unlikely), but I have seen absolutely no evidence of God’s love or mercy for anyone or anything, either in my life nor in studying human history. If he exists, he’s not terribly interested in human suffering. The “playing God” cop-out is for those too weak or credulous to realize that we are in charge of our own fate; and must deal with life accordingly. No one else is going to do it for us. I suppose you would argue that Dr.s are “playing God” every time they save someone’s life using modern medicine. Are automobile designers “playing God” when they design newer, safer vehicles? Am I “playing God” when I decide to have (or not have) chemotherapy or surgery to remove cancer? I suppose we should just all let nature take it’s course if we become ill or injured, so as not to offend God’s sense of propriety?
Okay then, you have fun with your secular humanist-moral relativist-Darwinist-liberal belief that that which is beyond your comprehension does not exist and make your intellect your God.
I am so sorry to hear that. I will keep you in my prayers.
And yes, this is a horrific agenda the culture of death is seeking to impose.
How smug. How very Christian of you. Aren’t you playing God now with your highly judgmental (and highly inaccurate) post? The worst is calling me a liberal - I hate liberals and in fact I am an arch-conservative. It’s not my fault that I’m too knowledgeable, intelligent, well-read and thoughtful to fall for believing in ridiculous fairly-tales. I suppose you are even now smugly thinking of me slowly turning on a spit over a nice glowing fire in Hell personally made just for me by Satan. I guess that’s fair - an eternity of horrific torment for only a lifetime of “sin” (my particular sin would be in believing only in empirical evidence and science - with the very intellect God gave me with full omniscient forethought, right?). But then, who are we to question God?
Fine, I’ll retract the liberal statement. Though, aside from your protestations to the contrary, there is NOTHING conservative about your views — libertarian perhaps, but not conservative.
Can we agree to label you a “secular humanist-moral relativist-Darwinist-quasi-atheist”?
“Precisely, she determined that she would play god.”
And so what do you think of the person who decides to quit treatemnt knowing they could have lived a couple months longer — but still weould have died? Is that playing God? What about the doctor who gives that extra pain medication knowing that it might (or might not) be enough to kill?
I have no issue with someone making the decision to suspend medical care. This is quite different than actively taking steps to end one's life.
What about the doctor who gives that extra pain medication knowing that it might (or might not) be enough to kill?
Again, it goes to the doctor's intent.
The biggest problem I have with religion?
PEOPLE LIKE YOU.
Yeah,too bad about the young AIDS patient.I probably would go all out to find something to stave off death too.
I recall that song with the lyric,”I swear there ain’t no Heaven but I pray there ain’t no hell.Well,I do believe in Heaven but Hell seems like a little much for most ordinary sinners.
One thing about death-NO ONE gets out of here alive.So why the anxiety?Because its all we know and the only people I have met they are SURE there is a life beyond are those who have had near death experiences.All else rests on pure faith.
Not that there is anything wrong with THAT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.