Posted on 09/07/2007 8:46:32 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
Dear Friends,
We all want to see Ron Paul as the next president of the United States. In order to get there, he will first have to win the Republican nomination. I have seen him state on television that he will not run as a third party candidate, so it is vital that he win the nomination. This article from Wikipedia outlines the Republican primaries schedule.
Why is this important? As alert reader Verbatim writes:
As you may realize, there are many people from across the spectrum planning to support Ron Paul: Libertarians, Constitutionalists, Green Party members, disenfranchised Democrats, and of course the disenfranchised Republicans.
Many of these people may not realize that they NEED to change party affiliations to Republican to vote in the GOP Primary in many States. I think this information is important to get out as is instructions on how to change ones' party affiliation and the DEADLINE for each State. I think this information would be useful on every Ron Paul supporter website in existence, even if it is simply linked to.
Thanks, Verbatim
This is the preliminary schedule...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailypaul.com:80 ...
My liberal coworker is one of them.
Silly me. I thought “moonbat” would be pronounced “moonbat.”
How do you know the vowels get lengthened just by looking at the word?
Isolationist space cadets who appeal to the Far Left and the Far Right. Dangerous.
Boy ejonesie22, you really have a way of bringing them out of the woodwork; even the Newbie RP trolls.
So that improves with the influx of libs who love Paul's war stance...
Mirror universe indeed...
Wow that's just damned BRILLIANT!...
“My liberal coworker is one of them.”
Spray it with Lysol when it’s not looking and see what happens.
Allen did himself in with that stupid “macaca” remark and his inability to fight back against Webb; Santorum lost by backing Specter - plus the fact that Pennsylvania has gone over to the lib side and is now beyond the GOP’s reach; Talent was a victim of anger against Bush. Talent’s loss in a way was the biggest because he is a good guy. He could come back; Rick could never get reelected in liberal Pennsylvania; Allen should try to run now that Warner is stepping down.
You ever picked fruit by shaking a tree...
This is much easier...
So you're saying the Republican party shouldn't accept new members? Rather just dry up and blow away into the dustbin of history eh? Classical Liberals like myself left years ago and are only coming back for Rep. Paul's campaign. Why? It's quite evident the majority of Republicans could care less for limited government. Rep. Paul reminds us of a time when conservatives were conservative.
Not true...
Democrats and Independents indeed voted for Reagan, regardless of their party affiliations. They did not change parties to corrupt the party nomination process.
I hope many Democrats come to their senses and vote for a good Republican candidate. But they shouldn’t change parties for the sole purpose of corrupting the party nomination process.
Frankly, the RNC is full of RINO’s today as a direct result of the nutty “BIG TENT” theory. The RNC will NEVER be “conservative” again if it welcomes liberals into it’s fold, no matter the reasons.
BUMP!
He’s NO threat... his followers are.
I wouldn’t woory, most will not be able to bring themselves to claim they are Republicans anyway.
Both of whom are as “conservative” as you can elect in their VERY liberal states.
I think I tracked it back to 1997 when the Christian Coalition was sued.
A classic liberal is coming back, as a Republican, because Paul is a classic conservative?
Ok you lost me a bit right there...
My eyes are blurry, that should be worry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.