Posted on 09/07/2007 8:46:32 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
Dear Friends,
We all want to see Ron Paul as the next president of the United States. In order to get there, he will first have to win the Republican nomination. I have seen him state on television that he will not run as a third party candidate, so it is vital that he win the nomination. This article from Wikipedia outlines the Republican primaries schedule.
Why is this important? As alert reader Verbatim writes:
As you may realize, there are many people from across the spectrum planning to support Ron Paul: Libertarians, Constitutionalists, Green Party members, disenfranchised Democrats, and of course the disenfranchised Republicans.
Many of these people may not realize that they NEED to change party affiliations to Republican to vote in the GOP Primary in many States. I think this information is important to get out as is instructions on how to change ones' party affiliation and the DEADLINE for each State. I think this information would be useful on every Ron Paul supporter website in existence, even if it is simply linked to.
Thanks, Verbatim
This is the preliminary schedule...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailypaul.com:80 ...
Ron Pat Paulson’s internet campaign is being run out of the HilaryCare War Room. They all parrot the same ol Dem talking points with a Repub Cliche thrown on for good measure.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Sophistry!
there is an actor who plays the doctor/surgeon role in a few horror movies that looks just like him! i wish i could remember the movie(s) though.
Why am I not surprised that a Ron Paul supporter needs a law to tell him right from wrong???
It’s NOT because they are conservatives or Republicans, now is it...
Always, and our country, especially the moonbats.
How about HONESTY?
He will probably try to get them to do just that. The Paulistas are crazed.
He was always pro-life. When he accepted the Libertarian party's offer to run for President under its banner, he made clear to them that the abortion issue was non-negotiable.
Paul is the only pro-life rep who consistently voted against every ban or restriction on abortion on Federal land and overseas military bases.
He voted against the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 — Laci and Conner’s Law and against the prenatal pain law.
He finally did vote for the partial birth abortion ban.
50% of American voters dont vote at all because they lost faith in the integrity of the process long ago.They didn't lose faith, what maudlin BS, they're stupid well fed consuming losers...
What DU rock did you slither out from under?Bite me noob, I've been carrying the conservative standard long enough to have a copy of The Goldwaters of Arizona signed by Mr. Goldwater himself...
A more interesting question might be, does the self-proclaimed “constitutionalist” believe in our basic founding principles or not?
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
If our CREATOR endowed us with a fundamental “right to life”, (without which there is no such thing as personal liberty or happiness), why did he vote against parental rights of notification for minors seeking an abortion, against interstate travel for underage abortions, against calling the killing of an unborn child during a violent crime against the mother and child, murder?
If Paul believes so strongly in our founding pricniples, then why is he opposed to prayer in school, when we know that the founders opened every school house and library by placing first, a Christian bible on the shelf, opened and closed every public meeting with a prayer?
Why did he vote against school prayer, even in the aftermath of 9/11, when so many Christian Americans were seeking comfort and guidence from their CREATOR?
The man is a fraud! And so are his Jim Jones like followers.
Saying so, doesn’t make it so.
Ron Paul claims to be lots of things his history would not support...
We joke about Osama supporting Dr. Paul but there is some truth in that.
Alex Jones makes about as much sense as he does.
IMHO.
Ron Paul on Abortion
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mothers life. (Oct 2003)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted YES on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.