To: JTN
Oh, I know. Of course, the Constitution doesn't say anything about this, but I'm sure it emanates from a penumbra or something.
An interesting reference to the Griswold v. Connecticut case--in other words, creating a constitutional right out of whole cloth. A major factor in Roe v. Wade, and the companion case, Doe v. Bolton, securing the perceived right to abortion.
The Libertarian Party is pretty much pro-choice, isn't it? Wasn't Ron Paul the party's presidential nominee a few years back--and now he's Mr. Pro-Life? So what's changed, I have to ask.
190 posted on
09/07/2007 7:49:21 PM PDT by
governmentstillsucks
(Anyone else notice the similarities between Osama bin Ladin and Borat?)
To: governmentstillsucks
The Libertarian Party is pretty much pro-choice, isn't it? Wasn't Ron Paul the party's presidential nominee a few years back--and now he's Mr. Pro-Life? So what's changed, I have to ask. He was always pro-life. When he accepted the Libertarian party's offer to run for President under its banner, he made clear to them that the abortion issue was non-negotiable.
191 posted on
09/07/2007 8:18:17 PM PDT by
JTN
(‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
To: governmentstillsucks
I should add to my last comment that Congressman Paul was always pro-life unlike any of the candidates leading him in the polls right now.
192 posted on
09/07/2007 8:32:58 PM PDT by
JTN
(‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson