Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'We have broken speed of light'
Telegraph ^ | 8/16/07 | Nick Fleming

Posted on 08/16/2007 10:15:43 AM PDT by LibWhacker

A pair of German physicists claim to have broken the speed of light - an achievement that would undermine our entire understanding of space and time.

According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second.

However, Dr Gunter Nimtz and Dr Alfons Stahlhofen, of the University of Koblenz, say they may have breached a key tenet of that theory.

The pair say they have conducted an experiment in which microwave photons - energetic packets of light - travelled "instantaneously" between a pair of prisms that had been moved up to 3ft apart.

Being able to travel faster than the speed of light would lead to a wide variety of bizarre consequences.

For instance, an astronaut moving faster than it would theoretically arrive at a destination before leaving.

The scientists were investigating a phenomenon called quantum tunnelling, which allows sub-atomic particles to break apparently unbreakable laws.

Dr Nimtz told New Scientist magazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of."


TOPICS: Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alfonsstahlhofen; alternateuniverses; broken; burnthematthestake; einstein; germany; gettheattackdogs; grammarpolice; gunternimtz; hisneighborswiestein; hyperdrive; koblenz; light; makeitso; mtheory; nimtz; paralleluniverses; quantummechanics; relativity; speed; stringtheory; torchesandpitchforks; warp; warpdrive; warpspeed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-372 next last
To: LibWhacker; All

pfft..my ex-wife broke that barrier years ago when at 2 a.m. she would show up at the front door ready to fight before I got the dang car in the garage..


281 posted on 08/16/2007 4:03:13 PM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (I'm a Patriot Guard Rider - www.patriotguard.org for more info..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

No warp drive. Tunnel drive and or worm hole. either works for me!!!


282 posted on 08/16/2007 4:05:23 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware of the seminar poster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
That, and the fact that gravity propagates at a speed that must be at least 2 * 1010 c, and may be infinite. If gravity moved at the comparatively sluggish speed of light then the Earth would spiral into the Sun.

What is your basis for this claim? I hope you aren't one of those folks who confuses phase velocity with group velocity or does not know how to calculate a spherical wavefront.

283 posted on 08/16/2007 4:05:47 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I would give my left one to go with him. Maybe he will be back this week and we can work it out!


284 posted on 08/16/2007 4:06:29 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware of the seminar poster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Quantum teleportation perhaps?

Mike

285 posted on 08/16/2007 4:12:13 PM PDT by MichaelP (I'll have another fine cigar please...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
For thirty years or more there has been a divergence in Physics. The Einstein crew (string) and the quantum crew. Neither may be absolutely correct and it is a know fact. They for the most part leave each other alone. This experiment may cause them to come together and resolve the problems with both theories. I strongly recommend the book “The elegant Universe, by Brian Greene” for anyone who is truly interested in this experiment.
286 posted on 08/16/2007 4:14:36 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware of the seminar poster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Neutron stars (heavy masses) in close orbit throw off huge amounts of gravitons. They spiral in and crash due to conservation of angular momentum.

If the Earth really were attracted to where the Sun was eight minutes ago - well, I admit I was wrong about them crashing into each other. The signs are the wrong way around :0) If gravity propagated outward from the Sun at the speed of light then its mostly radial effect would also have a small transverse component because of the motion of the target. This would act to speed up the Earth in its orbit, sending it slowly away from the sun.

Don't be silly. It isn't as if the Sun is on the telephone with the Earth asking it where to direct its gravitational force (which would cause a 16 minute delay for that conversation). If you consider gravity being propagated as a spherical wave front with no knowledge of what it is going to affect then all of your problems will go away. And if you want some actual calculations/derivations, read here. I also suggest you read up on how central forces work. This logic you used with gravity would cause the exact same problem in electrodynamics. But in those cases there would be a much larger fractional difference between the two objects. If your assumptions were true you would never see stable cyclotron motion (like an electron in a constant magnetic field).

287 posted on 08/16/2007 4:31:53 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic
Fascinating...
288 posted on 08/16/2007 4:35:48 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (I like Rodney Carrington's recipe for World Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep; traderrob6

We shouldn’t be so harsh. Grammer policing allows an English major to participate in an educated conversation.


289 posted on 08/16/2007 4:40:49 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Hum.... to be honest it smells like “Cold Fusion” all over again. I heard Linus Pauling speak on that Matter at Oregon State University. I wonder what he would say now? Most likely, to what decimal degree was the TIME measured to. Because 1) 3 feet is not real far apart, and 2) More than likely there IS a time lag, they were simply not capable of measuring. Get those crystals a MILE apart and then we will have some idea of the accuracy of their claim. Until they can do this over a distance, one great enough to actually measure the difference with currently existing measuring equipment. The closer one gets to the speed of light the more infinitely short the time period becomes, it may LOOK like 0, but it isn’t. Any more than they can calculate the EXACT value of Pi.


290 posted on 08/16/2007 4:44:06 PM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha (Smoke clears and Fred Thompson is President))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
"How many do you need?"

The first offence results in a reprimand, but further incursions may result in fines or imprisonment...

291 posted on 08/16/2007 4:44:46 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

BTTT


292 posted on 08/16/2007 4:47:11 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
" I utilize the speed of light frequently and I’m not at all happy about this."

No joke! My EDMs may be lying to me. (and, can you imagine all the speeding tickets that may get jury trials)

293 posted on 08/16/2007 4:49:33 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

But can they fix the check engine light on my BMW ? NOOOO!


294 posted on 08/16/2007 4:49:40 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know. F Troop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

So Obama can correct himself before he puts his foot in his mouth on foreign policy. Or Hillary can correct herself before she claimed she had never advocated socialized medicine. Or Edwards would never need another haircut - think of the money he will save. Wow.


295 posted on 08/16/2007 4:53:50 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second.

If I'm not mistaken E=MC2 solved for C equated to mass becoming infinite, not energy.

296 posted on 08/16/2007 4:59:44 PM PDT by fedupjohn (If we try to fight the war on terror with eyes shut + ears packed with wax, innocent people will die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1L
"Dumb question alert: why is the speed of LIGHT specifically supposedly the ceiling on speed?"

While you are at it, why not ask the other question: Does light ever slow down and stop? ;o)

297 posted on 08/16/2007 5:04:42 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic

around 5-10 years ago, three different labs around the world independently demonstrated the ability to accelerate a photon to something like 500, yes, 500 times the speed of light. Yet so little has been said about this...


298 posted on 08/16/2007 5:07:16 PM PDT by bioqubit (bioqubit, conformity - such a common deformity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grumpy_Mel
I am just trying to illustrate that something traveling faster then the speed of light does NOT require arriving at a destination before it left the origin (a logical paradox and therefore impossible).

It's only a logical paradox IF (big if) your understanding of space-time is correct. But what if your understanding of space-time is not correct? It's possible to be formally logical correct under a certain set of assumptions, and still be wrong.

There are a lot of things in relativistic and quantum physics that "conventional" logic would deem impossible.

299 posted on 08/16/2007 5:12:15 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
If I'm not mistaken E=MC2 solved for C equated to mass becoming infinite, not energy

Indirectly, I suppose, but only because kinetic energy would be subject to the [sqrt(1-v2/c2]-1 term.

300 posted on 08/16/2007 5:14:22 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-372 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson