Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The downside of diversity
the International Herald Tribune ... The Boston Globe ^ | August 5, 2007 | Michael Jonas

Posted on 08/05/2007 7:48:56 PM PDT by george76

IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: our differences make us stronger.

But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam...has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects.

In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.

"The extent of the effect is shocking," says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist.

The study comes at a time when the future of the American melting pot is the focus of intense political debate, from immigration to race-based admissions to schools, and it poses challenges to advocates on all sides of the issues. The study is already being cited by some conservatives as proof of the harm large-scale immigration causes to the nation's social fabric...

"We can't ignore the findings," says Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition. "The big question we have to ask ourselves is, what do we do about it; what are the next steps?"

(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: culturewars; diversity; ethnicdiversity; multicultural; multiculturalism; pc; politicalcorrectness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: HitmanLV

There is diversity of race and gender, and then there is diversity of cultural values. The first kind of diversity can be a good thing, but the second kind will never work.


21 posted on 08/05/2007 8:48:10 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ken21

I don’t go to McDonald’s or any other fast food place anymore (mainly because of the hygiene habits of the illegals who work there,) but at the grocery and other stores around here, the Hispanics are horribly rude to us gringos. Never a “please.” Never a “thank you.” The baggers literally shove the groceries at you. Forget about getting help finding anything or reaching items on high shelves. The workers have a total attitude. I go out of my way to shop in another neighborhood, just to get pleasant, friendly, helpful service.


22 posted on 08/05/2007 8:49:02 PM PDT by Nea Wood (I'm not a bad Christian because I refuse to join you in giving other people's stuff away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76
IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength

Why?

No one can actually explain the substance of this premise to me.

What are the benefits of "embracing" other people's cultures any more than taking in other people's washing?

Should we perform Voodoo ceremonies in public to "embrace" West Indian culture?

How about some public hangings or honor killings to embrace Islam?

Got any more suggestions? Perhaps a Mayan human sacrifice or two?

23 posted on 08/05/2007 8:50:30 PM PDT by Wil H (So just what IS the Globe's optimum temperature?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength

Why?

No one can actually explain the substance of this premise to me.

What are the benefits of "embracing" other people's cultures any more than taking in other people's washing?

Should we perform Voodoo ceremonies in public to "embrace" West Indian culture?

How about some public hangings or honor killings to embrace Islam?

Got any more suggestions? Perhaps a Mayan human sacrifice or two?

24 posted on 08/05/2007 8:50:35 PM PDT by Wil H (So just what IS the Globe's optimum temperature?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Diversity of race and sex (not gender) are only meaningful in this context if there is a distinctly unique racial and sex-based way of thinking that can’t come from someone outside of that particular race. So unless there is a unique ‘black’ way of thinking, for example, that only a black person can give you, it’s not so meaningful.

Get any 10 people together, even if they are of the same sex and race, and there is more likely than not no unanimity of opinion and a good diversity of ideas.


25 posted on 08/05/2007 8:51:38 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

We see many who refuse to speak English even if they can.

They take over small towns and / or communities with no intention to blend in. Some places are having turf wars between different Mexican drug gangs.


26 posted on 08/05/2007 8:54:33 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: george76

I agree with you, but that’s got nothing much to do with what I wrote.


27 posted on 08/05/2007 8:56:53 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: george76

Stating the obvious.


29 posted on 08/05/2007 8:59:11 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Taz Struck By Lightning Faces Battery Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajs32mh
"Diversity of ideas is good."

Sounds good, but rings false if the "diverse" ideas are from fools or people of "diverse" objectives preventing progress.

Cases in point -- look at all the accomplishments of our "diverse" Congress...

Observe the joy the diversity of Shiite, Sunni and Kurd brought to Iraq...

Diverse opinions and ideas can be a powerful tool -- assuming they come from folks who SHARE culturally compatible objectives, working as a TEAM.

Unfortunately, lots of folks haven't progressed to that level of civilization..

30 posted on 08/05/2007 9:15:30 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

What? There’s an upside? ;’)


31 posted on 08/05/2007 9:17:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Thursday, August 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m actually surprised they are admitting it.


32 posted on 08/05/2007 9:30:22 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Since Brown v. Board of Education was decided, not on the basis of the Constitution, but on the basis of the USCC's assertion that Negro children would learn better if mixed in with white children, what does this new information do to Brown, et al.? Oh, yeah. Liberals never have to answer questions.
33 posted on 08/05/2007 9:34:39 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I’m not shocked at all. All one has to do is look at the childish political bickering and inefficiencies of virtually every big city council or school district to see that “diversity” is anything but a strength.


34 posted on 08/05/2007 9:37:09 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Not so much a question of whether diversity has a downside...but is there any genuine upside?


35 posted on 08/05/2007 9:58:19 PM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

It is not diversity, it is because we are letting in people who are too racist (La Raza) and only think about their own race. Only White Europeans are stupid enough to let its culture be destroyed by uncheck immigration.


36 posted on 08/05/2007 10:13:29 PM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
What gets stronger by breaking it up or dividing it.
37 posted on 08/05/2007 10:16:05 PM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: george76; SunkenCiv

thanks, bfl


38 posted on 08/05/2007 10:19:45 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: george76

This “downside” is only a temporary dip before the eventual rise. The reality is that diversity of thought, value systems, experience, and ideas can only help in solving any and all problems society may have.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting the same result. Well, with diversity, no one will ever try and solve a problem in the same way, thus increasing the probability that any and all problems of society will ultimately be solved in the least time consuming way.

Additionally, aren’t the chances of producing genetically diseased babies markedly reduced when diverse couples intermarry? Recessive and harmful genetic traits are totally killed off in populations that enjoy interexchange of DNA, and this is symbolic of the societal benefits as well.

Rome forged a new people - so will we.


39 posted on 08/05/2007 11:16:13 PM PDT by DEFENDER10005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DEFENDER10005

RE: Your definition of insanity fits your unfounded assumptions about the benefits of ‘diversity’ read the article also see replies 30 and 36.

The basic assumptions underlying your statement about the benefits of diversity is wrong. Among other things you assume that there is 1)a shared interest in solving the problem; 2) a shared definition of the problem/situation; 3) a shared commitment to participate in implementing a solution; 4)a commitment to risk implementing a solution.

Not one of those is a safe assumption when dealing with cultures that do not share some significant basic values, principles and world view. There are basic contradictions in values (e.g. embracing children as living civilian bombers), taboos (using women and children as human shields in combat), etc.


40 posted on 08/06/2007 5:18:43 AM PDT by NHResident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson