Posted on 07/04/2007 4:43:04 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
I was confident the New York Times would find a way to pour cold water on the Fourth of July. Still, turning to it this morning, I was curious to see just what kind of wet [with that cold water]blanket the Times would throw on our national holiday. And the Grey Lady didn't disappoint, with a sour, melancholy editorial viewing America through the eyes of other countries -- and naturally finding us wanting.
Looking Outward on the Fourth begins with a lament over "these very difficult times, four years deep into a war that has turned much of the world against this country." Got that? It's America's fault that times are tough, not that the world seethes with madmen who want to destroy the West. The editors then take a shot at unnamed "political leaders" [who could they be?] who "seek to arrogate the idea of freedom as their own political preserve."
The Times then goes into Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin mode:
Ideas have a way of recommending themselves by the behavior of the men and women who hold them, and this is no less true of nations. The question isnt simply whether we can project our ideal of freedom around the world. The question is whether, by who we are and how we behave, we can make the freedom that animates us compelling to others.Capiche? On the Fourth, you jingoistic hicks out there indulge in easy, comfortable gratification over how great America is. But not the Times. Citizen of the world that it is, the Times sees America through the eyes of other countries. And guess what? Things are "equivocal." We might not be living up to the expectations of France, Venezuela, China. Who knows -- perhaps even Borat's beloved Kazakhstan is disappointed in us.
The country looks inward on the Fourth of July not in introspection, but in an easy, comfortable sense of historical gratification. Yet this is a good day to look outward as well.
It is a day to ask how good a job from the worlds perspective we are doing living up to the principles enunciated in the Declaration of Independence, whether we have done enough to make those sonorous old rights seem like more than a limited case in a limited argument. The answer is more equivocal than we like to believe.
That was awesome. Great work!
Many days I wonder if we are living up to those principals myself. Then I read this and realize we must be doing much better than I thought!
Happy Independence Day All!
I thought I had them...The pics the NYT put of the VP’s house so all could recognise them, etc but can’t find them now.... .....Just a reminder they are “up to date!”
If the NYT dislikes the USA so much .. then get out .. leave .. go live in one of those countries they admire so much more then the USA
Great graphics! The masthead should also include the hammer and sickle, in addition to the crescent and swatstika, since they were enablers to Stalin’s purge and collectivization and starvation of the Ukraine. Or, how about, “We always blame America first” under the masthead.
You could’ve saved a lot of typing and just said that the NYT hates conservative Republicans and George W. Bush in particular. It’s really not any more complicated than that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.