The party will either go into the 21st century and win elections, or it will refuse to modernize and continue to lose. I hope party leaders have the foresight to realize that opposing modernity is a losing strategy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Alter Kaker
or it will refuse to modernize and continue to lose. I hope party leaders have the foresight to realize that opposing modernity is a losing strategy. Oh, Gerald Ford how we need you so now!
139 posted on
06/11/2007 3:19:50 PM PDT by
Tribune7
(A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
To: Alter Kaker
Take one water bottle.
Add a vitamin pill.
Heat for a billion years...
Then poof! You have life?
To: Alter Kaker
Go with the consensus. If it’s phlogiston, it’s phlogiston.
167 posted on
06/11/2007 3:59:02 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Treaty)
To: Alter Kaker
Yeah, but the way they put the question, made me, a devoted amateur scientist, wonder as well.
“do you think that humans evolved from slime mold, billions of years ago?” (paraphrased, but you get the idea).
I don’t believe that evolution weakens true faith, or what my heart knows to be true.
However, a question like that kinda makes ya think about just what is more fantastic to believe.
170 posted on
06/11/2007 4:01:13 PM PDT by
Wiseghy
("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
To: Alter Kaker
Its a bloody "THEORY not a proven scientific principal like Global Warming. //sarc
180 posted on
06/11/2007 4:23:51 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: Alter Kaker
191 posted on
06/11/2007 5:16:59 PM PDT by
labette
To: Alter Kaker
Yeah, they should buy into watered-down 21st century morality. Yeah, throw in with the declining morality. Just go with the flow...
Sarcasm off.
200 posted on
06/11/2007 5:48:43 PM PDT by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Alter Kaker
Independents are just Democrats who use their ‘neutral’ or ‘undecided’ position to try to get conservatives to compromise on their positions.
To: Alter Kaker
The only reliable conclusion is the c.20% who thought humans developed over millions of years after being created less than 10,000 years ago were really, really confised.
207 posted on
06/11/2007 6:32:00 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(conservatism as the fusion of libertarianism and traditionalism - John Stuart Mill and Edmund Burke)
To: Alter Kaker
14% point to a supposed lack of scientific evidence as their reason for rejecting evolution. Almost all of the rest point to religious motivations. Yes, this is all about the science all right!
To: Alter Kaker
or it will refuse to modernize and continue to loseIn other words, you are suggesting that the party compromise what they believe is important in order to win races. I would rather lose races than compromise my beliefs. Those that want to compromise can be demorats, the party of flip flops.
To: Alter Kaker
I believe that if Evolution exists, then God created it.
And for those who don't believe in God, you better be right.
Amen.
242 posted on
06/11/2007 10:33:25 PM PDT by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: Alter Kaker
254 posted on
06/12/2007 1:12:31 AM PDT by
balch3
To: Alter Kaker
I hope party leaders have the foresight to realize that opposing modernity is a losing strategy.When William F. Buckley founded the National Review - helping to lend coherence and power to the nascent conservative movement - he said that the goal of his new publication was to "stand athwart the gates of history crying 'Stop!'"
Conforming to modernist nostrums is a losing strategy: ask the Rockefeller Republicans.
262 posted on
06/12/2007 6:29:25 AM PDT by
wideawake
("Pearl Harbor is all America's fault, right, Mommy?" - Ron Paul, age 6, 12/7/1941)
To: Alter Kaker
I’ve become very confident lately that most of the GOP elected officials are decendent from the jackass...but hey, thats just me.
264 posted on
06/12/2007 7:16:13 AM PDT by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: Alter Kaker
Evolution? Bah! It's Devolution!
To: Alter Kaker
What a great post, is sure to bring the weevils clambering to the top of the barrel.
I'll have to bookmark it for future reference under "These are not worth responding to".
Otherwise, no comment, I know what I believe in.
To: Alter Kaker
Particularly interesting is the graph equating evolution denial with church attendance. It shows that there are a lot of false prophets out there brainwashing their congregations with dismal ignorance about fundamental grade school biology. It’s a real shame that so many people who are intelligent enough to dismiss the disease of liberalism will blindly drink the kool-aid when being lied to by anti-science hucksters pretending to know the Lord.
285 posted on
06/12/2007 1:56:18 PM PDT by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: Alter Kaker
But even among non-Republicans there appears to be a significant
minority who doubt that evolution adequately explains where humans
came from.
Frank Newport (author of this Gallup press-release) must be a
J-School grad.
Because only a J-School grad would TOTALLY miss the headline in
this story.
How on Earth could about two-fifths of Democrats and a fair number
of independents still be Evolution-Deniers?
Most Republicans don't believe in evolution?
Heck, that's "dog bites man".
Democrats and independents not believing in evolution?
That's "man bites dog"!!!
317 posted on
06/13/2007 5:35:03 PM PDT by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson