Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA, Democrats reach gun law deal
tampabay.com ^ | June 10, 2007 | Jonathan Weisman

Posted on 06/10/2007 7:39:59 AM PDT by holymoly

The gun lobby wrests some concessions as it agrees to back stronger background checks.

WASHINGTON - Senior Democrats have reached agreement with the National Rifle Association on what could be the first federal gun-control legislation since 1994, a measure to significantly strengthen the national system that checks the backgrounds of gun buyers.

The sensitive talks began in April, days after a mentally ill gunman killed 32 students and teachers at Virginia Tech University. The shooter, Seung Hui Cho, had been judicially ordered to submit to a psychiatric evaluation, which should have disqualified him from buying handguns. But the state of Virginia never forwarded that information to the federal National Instant Check System, and the massacre exposed a loophole in the 13-year-old background-check program.

Under the agreement, participating states would be given monetary enticements for the first time to keep the federal background database up to date, as well as penalties for failing to comply.

To sign on to the deal, the powerful gun lobby won significant concessions from Democratic negotiators in weeks of painstaking talks. Individuals with minor infractions in their pasts could petition their states to have their names removed from the federal database, and about 83, 000 military veterans, put into the system by the Department of Veterans Affairs in 2000 for alleged mental health reasons, would have a chance to clean their records.

The federal government would be permanently barred from charging gun buyers or sellers a fee for their background checks. In addition, faulty records such as duplicative names or expunged convictions would have to be scrubbed from the database.

"The NRA worked diligently with the concerns of gun owners and law enforcement in mind to make a ... system that's better for gun owners and better for law enforcement, " said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell, D-Mich., a former NRA board member, who led the talks.

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., had been pushing similar legislation for years. But her reputation as a staunch opponent of the gun lobby - she came to Congress to promote gun control after her husband was gunned down in a massacre on the Long Island Rail Road - ruined any chance of a deal with the NRA.

Convenient deal

By contrast, this agreement is a marriage of convenience for both sides. Democratic leaders are eager to show that they can respond legislatively to the Virginia Tech rampage, a feat that GOP leaders would not muster after the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado. Meanwhile, the NRA was motivated to show it would not stand in the way of a bill that would not harm law-abiding gun buyers. Even so, it drove a hard bargain to quiet its smaller but more vociferous rival, Gun Owners of America.

Chris W. Cox, the NRA's chief lobbyist, said Saturday that the organization will strongly support the legislation as written. "We've been on record for decades for keeping firearms out of the hands of the mentally adjudicated. It's not only good policy, it's good politics, " he said. But Cox warned that if the legislation becomes a "gun-control wish list" as it moves through Congress, the NRA will withdraw its support.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; nra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
Individuals with minor infractions in their pasts could petition their states to have their names removed from the federal database

Only those who have been convicted of a felony, are under indictment on felony charges, and/or have been adjudicated mentally ill, are prohibited from purchasing firearms.

(See: ATF Form 4473)

So, why will "minor infractions" even be included in the Federal database?

And what "minor infractions"? Jay walking? Traffic tickets?

I drove by a dead skunk on the road a few days ago.

That dead skunk smelled better than this NRA "compromise".

1 posted on 06/10/2007 7:40:03 AM PDT by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Its a good deal. But if the Democrats renege on their agreement, the NRA will oppose it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 06/10/2007 7:42:46 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

In Illinois Guns Save A Life, Burma Shave type signs have been posted along the roadsides but it doesn’t take long for the anti-gunners to pull them down!

http://www.gunssavelife.com/burma.htm

By the way.

I Just received from the NRA pre addressed post cards for me to send to my Illinois representatives from me.

They have to be kidding!

My representatives are:

Senator Dick (Turban) Durbin
Senator Barack (Osama) Obama
U.S Representative Bobby (former Chicago Black Panther Minister of Defense)Rush.

I live in Cook (Crook) County, Illinois enough said.


3 posted on 06/10/2007 7:43:19 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

—bflr—


4 posted on 06/10/2007 7:45:58 AM PDT by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Not a good idea. I say arm everyone. Then... when some nutcase decides he/she wants to start shooting innocent people those people will be able to evaluate him/her and pop a cap in his/her arse.

No need for background check. PERIOD!!!

5 posted on 06/10/2007 7:53:04 AM PDT by EndWelfareToday (Live free and keep what you earn. - Tancredo or Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Sorry, I still smell a rat. If someone is deemed a greater-than-average threat to public safety, based on past actions, he should be kept off the streets. Everyone else should be allowed to defend himself.


6 posted on 06/10/2007 7:58:36 AM PDT by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EndWelfareToday

BINGO!!! I posted my last response before seeing yours - these are my thoughts exactly. Do we really need Uncle Sam poking his nose into our medical records before determining whether the 2nd Amendment applies?


7 posted on 06/10/2007 8:00:33 AM PDT by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
8 posted on 06/10/2007 8:07:29 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EndWelfareToday
No need for background check. PERIOD!!!

No need for gun laws.

9 posted on 06/10/2007 8:14:36 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (If you don't like rape, don't rape anyone. Don't push your morality on others!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

Future revisions will expand the background checks to include teacher’s recommendations, e.g., for Ritalin, etc.


10 posted on 06/10/2007 8:22:02 AM PDT by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
And what "minor infractions"?

There are many citizens who had been accused of spousal abuse that are prevented from buying firearms without being convicted. This is common in nasty divorces where the wife claims physical abuse, and the court includes this on the husband's record with no evidence.

There are many expunged convictions that still prevent citizens from buying firearms for their protection.

Currently, it is nearly impossible for these people to get their names cleared. The NRA made this a priority.

11 posted on 06/10/2007 8:23:49 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Minor infractions.......

Driving off a bridge leading to the death of a woman

COMMITTING PERJURY WHEN LYING ABOUT SEX IN A FEDERAL OFFICE WITH A WOMAN OTHER THAN YOUR WIFE

HAVING 90 THOUSAND DOLLARS IN MARKED BILLS IN YOUR FREEZER THAT MATCH NUMBER FOR NUMBER THE MONEY IN AN FBI STING

GIVING YOUR LOADED GUN TO AN AIDE WHO IS ARRESTED FOR ITS POSSESSION ON CAPITAL HILL

Need we go on!


12 posted on 06/10/2007 8:32:46 AM PDT by colonialhk (Power and Money,the new mantra of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Senator Dick (Turban) Durbin
Senator Barack (Osama) Obama
U.S Representative Bobby (former Chicago Black Panther Minister of Defense)Rush.

Curly, Moe, and Larry.

Looks like the armpit of the country, politically speaking that is..

13 posted on 06/10/2007 8:33:33 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
NRA, Democrats reach gun law deal

That headline doesn't exactly warm the cockles of my heart.

14 posted on 06/10/2007 8:34:20 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly; AnnaZ; lowbridge; feinswinesuksass
But Cox warned that if the legislation becomes a "gun-control wish list" as it moves through Congress, the NRA will withdraw its support.

LOL

15 posted on 06/10/2007 8:37:13 AM PDT by HangFire (I'm only wearing black until they come up with something darker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
More info:

States would be paid to comply.
Under the bill, states voluntarily participating in the system would have to file an audit with the U.S. attorney general of all the criminal cases, mental health adjudications and court-ordered drug treatments that had not been filed with the instant-check system.
The federal government would then pick up 90 percent of the cost for the states to get up to date within 180 days of the audit.
Once the attorney general determines that a state has cleared its backlog, the federal government would begin financing all the costs of keeping the system current. If a state's compliance lapses, the attorney general would be authorized to cut federal law enforcement grants, with more draconian aid cuts mandated if noncompliance stretches longer than a year.
The bill would authorize payments to the states of $250 million a year between 2008 and 2010, when the program would have to be reassessed and reauthorized by Congress.

Only one state, Vermont, does not participate in the instant-check system, and even with the threatened aid cuts, negotiators expressed confidence that no other state would drop out, given the funding that would be available and the stigma that would be attached to withdrawal.
"I can't imagine a scenario where a state would drop out, and say what? 'If you're adjudicated schizophrenic, you can buy your guns here'?" asked a Democratic aide involved directly in the negotiations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not cleared to speak to reporters.


Can you imagine a scenario where a state would say. 'You're an adjudicated gun nut, and you can't buy your guns here.'?

16 posted on 06/10/2007 8:39:29 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
I feel your pain. Illinois is pathetic!

Any time the words "Democrats" and "guns" appear in the same sentence, it can mean nothing good.

17 posted on 06/10/2007 8:48:15 AM PDT by Barnacle (Barred from posting on "A Day in the Life of President Bush" threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tpaine; All
Can you imagine a scenario where a state would say. 'You're an adjudicated gun nut, and you can't buy your guns here.'?

Yea. But I have a very vivid imagination. I can also imagine this:

(You go to a gun store to purchase a rifle, and...)

Gun Store Clerk: "According to the FBI back-ground check, you were convicted at the age of 19, of being a minor in possession of alcohol; specificially a partially-consumed six-pack of Budweiser beer. I'm sorry, but you are prohibited by Federal law from purchasing a firearm."

"You may, if you wish, 'petition' the state to have your name removed from the database. Of course, the state isn't required to approve your petition. Have a nice day."

18 posted on 06/10/2007 8:49:13 AM PDT by holymoly (With an anti-gun Congress, we must have a pro-gun President. www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Democratic leaders are eager to show that they can respond legislatively to the Virginia Tech rampage, a feat that GOP leaders would not muster after the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado.

It doesn't take a gun to kill.

If this were a serious attempt at preventing a killing spree, the focus would be on people and not guns.

If one is he!! bent on rampage, (illness or not) it certainly doesn't take a gun or guns to follow through.

Reference Oklahoma City, 911, or for all that matters, the Boston Strangler or Bundy.

19 posted on 06/10/2007 8:51:50 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Any time the words "Democrats" and "guns" appear in the same sentence, it can mean nothing good.

Anytime the words "Democrats" and "legislation" appear in the same sentence it can't be good!

20 posted on 06/10/2007 8:54:53 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson