Skip to comments.
Fred Thompson: Back to Backbone - History is fundamental.
National Review Online ^
| April 25, 2007
| Fred Thompson
Posted on 04/26/2007 9:30:01 AM PDT by neverdem
April 25, 2007, 11:20 p.m.
Back to Backbone History is fundamental.
By Fred Thompson
By now, we’re used to people like Iranian President Ahmadinejad denying that the Holocaust ever happened, even while he and his regime promise not only the destruction of Israel but the elimination of Jews internationally.
It’s bad enough hearing from a distance about the bizarre anti-Semitic theories taught by heads of state as well as schools and religious leaders. Now, according to a study funded by the British government, we find out that some schools in Great Britain have stopped teaching history that is offensive to Muslim students. The topics that have been erased from the curriculum, the study found, include both the Nazi genocide and the Crusades.
This rewriting of history through omission wasn’t some government policy. It was the result of individual decisions in local schools by teachers with large populations of Muslim students. Unfortunately, many of these students have been taught by parents and mosques that the holocaust never happened and that the Crusades were an unprovoked attack on Islam by European Christians. History books that present these events in any other light, they believe, are part some giant conspiracy designed to attack their very religion.
If anybody needs to hear these facts, it is the children who are being abused by those who are teaching the same hateful lies that have helped turn the Middle East into the self-destructive and often suicidal mess it is today.
The British are, in the main, a particularly polite people, but there is a point when the desire not to offend the easily offended becomes an even bigger problem. We’ve already seen an English organization ban images of Piglet, the harmless character from the classic Winnie the Pooh books, because of protests by those who imagine that simply seeing a cartoon pig is a violation of their civil rights. We’ve even seen the banning of pins bearing St. George’s cross, because it reminds some of the Crusades — accompanied by demands that Great Britain get rid of the venerable Union Jack for the same reason.
These views, common in the Middle East, are not just an academic or intellectual challenge. We have seen homegrown British terrorists act on the same lies and conspiracy theories that are now being used to silence teachers. Ideas do have consequences and we all need to understand that the war on terror is taking place as much in the realm of ideas as it is on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.
America is a free country and we do not tell people what they can believe or say. We should realize, however, that there are people in America who are also telling their children that the Holocaust is a lie and that those who say otherwise are their enemies. We cannot prevent them from doing so, but we also cannot let them promote their agenda by claiming they are victimized by historical facts.
This would be a good place to quote an important British writer, George Orwell, who wrote, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” Even in America, our children are often taught a watered down, inoffensive, and culturally sensitive version of events ranging from the Crusades to the battle at the Alamo.
It’s time for people who believe that they have a stake in Western civilization and its traditions to get a little backbone — even if it offends somebody.
© ABC Radio Editor's note: This has been amended since posting. |
|
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; rfr; runfredrun; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Aria
I couldnt figure out why W chose Cheney the second time around since it left us sorta bare for a 2008 candidate.
He chose Cheney because he knows his first job is to lead the country in wartime, not to worry about the 2008 election. Cheney is instrumental to that leadership.
Besides, sitting Vice Presidents have a very poor track record when it comes to being elected President. Remember, George H.W. Bush was only the fourth sitting VP to be elected President, and the first since Martin Van Buren in 1836. The other two were John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, and that was before the 12th Amendment changed how we elect the Vice President.
Or, to let the President speak for himself...
Steve Holland, Reuters: If I could try another Edwards question. He's being described today as charming, engaging, a nimble campaigner, a populist, and even sexy. How does he stack up against Dick Cheney?
The President: Dick Cheney can be President.
To: STARWISE
I believe Fred will run, but he’s probably waiting to announce his intentions until the Law & Order season is completed and the Cable TV movie he made has been shown. By waiting to announce until after then he avoids getting the TV stations in trouble with the Fairness Doctrine. So look for an announcement sometime in June.
22
posted on
04/26/2007 10:29:12 AM PDT
by
JUD
To: neverdem
23
posted on
04/26/2007 10:41:14 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
To: JUD
I thought the “Fairness Doctrine” was long defunct.
24
posted on
04/26/2007 11:18:53 AM PDT
by
Durus
("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
To: Petronski
nice pictures you have been posting, but maybe Fred will be like Reagan and only wear a suit in the Oval.
25
posted on
04/26/2007 11:27:31 AM PDT
by
APRPEH
(Hillary probably wouldn't approve, but I can live with that....)
To: APRPEH
I grabbed those pics from “Last Best Chance,” a little film made for Sam Nunn’s nuclear terrorism study group. In the film, Thompson conveniently played POTUS, including one scene in which he is briefed impromptu upon returning to the White House (thus the “Eisenhower jacket” pic).
26
posted on
04/26/2007 11:30:19 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(FRED!)
To: Hostage
I think Dick Cheney should resign, George Bush appoint FDT as VP and then resign.... What makes you think the Senate would approve the appointment?
It sure would be a way to vet Thompson as a candidate.
27
posted on
04/26/2007 11:37:57 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: janereinheimer
Truly great to watch a man with a plan, instead of the usual bunch of twits following the polls and trying to react to every batch of BS the MSM cooks up.
28
posted on
04/26/2007 11:39:12 AM PDT
by
newcthem
(A former republican......now I'm a Fredsureashellcan !!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Petronski
To: Durus; JUD
It’s the Equal Time Rule. Cable companies are not required to follow it, although they usually do.
30
posted on
04/26/2007 11:53:15 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Better a democrat with an energized opposition than a leftist “Republican” with no opposition.)
To: Carry_Okie
Sure and that way he could run for re-election as an incumbent. Sort of.
But it would work, don’t you think?
To: neverdem
Well said! I agree that taking away the world’s sordid past robs it of a healthy future. FDT would have far more power behind the pen than any president would have behind the desk.
32
posted on
04/26/2007 12:56:42 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
( Duncan Hunter '08)
To: janereinheimer
But it would work, dont you think? If Thompson's record is so clean that it becomes witch-hunt equivalent to the Alito confirmation, then sure, appointing him to VP would be great. There would be a backlash that would benefit Republicans across the board. If there is anything at all in his record, no matter how lame, that can be inflated into an issue, it would be the end of his candidacy.
That's what I meant by it being a great way to vet his background.
I had my concerns about Bush when he ran in 2000, that were confirmed when he chose Cheney as a running mate. It was immediately clear that he had no concern about positioning a successor. As much as I like Dick Cheney, IMO his health alone is too much of an issue, let alone how the Slave Party has been allowed to demonize him.
33
posted on
04/26/2007 1:00:26 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: neverdem
Its time for people who believe that they have a stake in Western civilization and its traditions to get a little backbone even if it offends somebody.
AMEN!
34
posted on
04/26/2007 1:05:17 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: neverdem
Run Fred RUN!!!
What's important about this is that it shows Fred *really* gets it. He doesn't just support the GWOT to support the GWOT while taking a largely PC stance that simultaneously undermines that support. Fred seems to really understand that the problem is political Islam, not just "a few extremists who defile a great religion", as a current Republican President has been known to say.
To: Durus
I thought the Fairness Doctrine was long defunct.I'm not sure about this, but I recall there being an issue that once you are declared a candidate, the presumed cost of coverage you get that others do not get can be charged to your campaign. I'm fuzzy on that, but I recall that issue being raised in the past when candidates were on TV programs or commentators considered running for office.
Or I could have dreamed it all.
36
posted on
04/26/2007 3:03:02 PM PDT
by
TN4Liberty
(Conservatives want to destroy terrorism. Liberals want to destroy conservatives.)
To: janereinheimer
Even if it would work in theory, politically it wouldn’t be prudent. Regardless of what we think or believe about GWB, he is going to be seen as a liability for Republicans.
Time for a clean start.
37
posted on
04/26/2007 3:09:15 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet & FredFan)
To: neverdem
To: neverdem
To: NavyCanDo
Or, Turn the Red States into Fred States.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson