Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Community Sues To Oust 3-Year-Old
ClickonDetroit ^ | April 1, 2007 | AP

Posted on 04/03/2007 6:15:39 AM PDT by ShadowDancer

Community Sues To Oust 3-Year-Old

Child With Drug-Addict Mom Lives With Grandparents

POSTED: 3:04 pm EDT April 1, 2007

LARGO, Fla. -- A Florida homeowners group wants 3-year-old Kimberly Broffman to take her Big Wheel and hit the road.

They've banded together to oust the toddler from their Tampa-area community, which bans residents under 18.

The child's grandparents, Judie and Jimmy Stottler, admit Kimberly's been living there in violation of homeowners' association rules for three years. They said her mother has a drug problem, and isn't capable of caring for the child.

The grandparents said they live on a fixed income and can't afford to move until they sell their house. So far, there have been no takers to buy their house, even after they lowered the $189,000 asking price by $10,000 six months ago.

They also said they can't afford to hire an attorney.

Judie Stottler supports the family with her $18,000-per year dishwashing job because Jimmy Stottler is disabled and is unable to work.

Judie Stottler's friends told the St. Petersburg Times that they are worried.

"It is so ridiculous that this has gone so far," said Keith Tinsley, a cook who works with her. "She's trying her best to sell her house. It's like they are trying to force her to put Kimberly in foster care.

"These people keep batting her down and batting her down. They're just mean."

Judie Stottler said she is scared that she wil lose her house before she is able to sell it.

"We don't have any family to take us in," Judie Stottler said.

The Lakes homeowners association filed suit to oust Kimberly last month.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-371 next last
To: LanPB01; Long Island Pete

Bravo. I hadn’t thought of the Green Machine in years. Not that I ever had one. We had to play with broken glass when I was a kid. One summer we had a stick. That was great, until the homeowner’s association took it away from us.


41 posted on 04/03/2007 6:45:45 AM PDT by Fry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
I want to make something clear, just so we can prevent the mincing of words. Most here are advocating removing a child from her family and placing her in foster care, for the sake of money. I want everyone to remember that clearly.

Especially considering that the grandparents have lowered their selling price. Seems to me that the National Socialist running the HOA is running all the buyers off.
42 posted on 04/03/2007 6:46:01 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete
I was really pissed my big wheels didnt come with that stuff.

Nah.. the hand break is like the extra safety mechanism on the Colt Series 80 1911's. You don't really want it, it degrades performance. You want the lean and mean original.

43 posted on 04/03/2007 6:46:59 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
People in these associations have NO discernment!!!

They don't NEED any, they have written contracts. Which, I might add, the grandparents in the story apparently agreed to.

----

The child NEEDS to be with the grandparents

Then the grandparents NEED to move or make other arrangements for her care.

-----

what do they want to put her in a foster home?

No, I imagine they want to live in the community under the rules everybody in the community agreed to.

-----

Yes...that IS what they want.

Since you're apparently psychic, would you mind giving me tomorrow's winning lottery numbers?

44 posted on 04/03/2007 6:47:25 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am ~NOT~ an administrative, corporate, legal, or public entity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

You said: It is really sad our older folks are removing themselves from everyone’s life. You would think older folks would enjoy youth around.

The will sow what they reap for the young will not care about them when they want free medical care and to be taken care of when they are older and will get what they deserve.
***
Sadly, this country has grown to ignore its seniors. (I am not yet one, but the time is getting closer.) We don’t venerate them the way many other cultures do. Instead, we warehouse them in nursing homes, etc. The sense of family that was largely in place just a few generations ago has deteriorated. I wonder how much support the members of this community get from their children and grandchildren?

While I don’t think I would choose to live in such a community, these folks bought property wanting to avoid the presence of children yelling and screaming and riding their Big Wheels all over. FR usually celebrates property rights of all kinds, as well as freedom in general. The mother in this case knew or should have know what she was buying. The HOA has waited around 3 years to act, which sounds pretty reasonable. Meanwhile, it looks like every relative this woman has is living with her, and not helping out.


45 posted on 04/03/2007 6:48:04 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
I want to make something clear, just so we can prevent the mincing of words. Most here are advocating removing a child from her family and placing her in foster care, for the sake of money. I want everyone to remember that clearly. Especially considering that the grandparents have lowered their selling price. Seems to me that the National Socialist running the HOA is running all the buyers off.

My first thought was to be humane and cut them some slack... the house is for sale. But, then again, this has been going on for 3 years. Perhaps the house is way over-priced i.e. its not really for sale. Anyway, hard to tell what's going on.

46 posted on 04/03/2007 6:48:20 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
No one is saying the kid would be better off in foster care, but this is a retirement neighborhood, and people came to it for peace and quiet.

Sacrifice the young to satisfy the older. This sounds like a less severe version of another problem our society has been having...
47 posted on 04/03/2007 6:48:27 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

In my opinion, anyone who would want to live in a neighborhood that has a Homeowners’ Ass’n is an imbecile.

The problem is the local authorities that allow these things to go in in the first place.


48 posted on 04/03/2007 6:49:25 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
Then the grandparents NEED to move or make other arrangements for her care.

They dropped the price on their house. Perhaps you believe they should give their house away? Great idea for old folks on a fixed income. Then again, the reason no one's bought it yet can probably traced back to the HOA to begin with...
49 posted on 04/03/2007 6:50:14 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

And since they are in the *wrong*, the Stottlers decided to run to the press hoping to sway public opinion with a naked appeal to emotion.

I’ll fix this for you

And since they are in dire straits, the Stottlers decided to appeal to the public for help with an impossoble situation and potentially raise awareness of their property for sale.


50 posted on 04/03/2007 6:50:27 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (Free speech for thee, but not for me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
I had no intention of directly insulting anyone here. If I did so, I apologize.

I just cannot understand why anyone would willingly agree to limit their personal property rights just so they can live in a neighborhood with an HOA.

I don’t think HOAs should be outlawed, it’s your right to organize and join one. However, signing a contract that says I cannot put up a flagpole in my front yard, or that I must mow my lawn every 6 and a half days, or that if I have a fence, it must be a certain style and color, and I can’t work on my car in the driveway...it’s ridiculous.

51 posted on 04/03/2007 6:51:05 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper
In my opinion, anyone who would want to live in a neighborhood that has a Homeowners' Ass'n is an imbecile.

It depends, there are thousands of them that you don't read articles about because they are not run by petty nazis. That being said, I generally agree with you. I live in one now, but that is because 60 houses share a lake, and it is pretty important that there be rules governing lake use, pollution, the maintenance of the dam, etc.

52 posted on 04/03/2007 6:51:20 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
No, they are not suprised, and theydo want to leave. They want their granddaughter to grow up around other kids. What they don't want is for their granddaughter to be placed in foster care if it takes longer than they hope for them to sell their house. I don't think that's unreasonable. The HOA should cut them some slack.
53 posted on 04/03/2007 6:51:30 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
This country's soul is ill...

And these are the same people foaming about how America isn't as much of a Christian nation as it should be. The thing about leaving a guy in a ditch on the Sabbath comes to mind here.

54 posted on 04/03/2007 6:51:33 AM PDT by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

I didn’t write that last sentence, mama...go look again....no, I;m not pshyic and yes, you have no heart.


55 posted on 04/03/2007 6:51:38 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

You people are nuts......you are comparing illegals to these grandparents taking care of their grandchild who NEEDS them? I must be on DU and not know it.


56 posted on 04/03/2007 6:53:00 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

And now I’m wondering if someone in the neighborhood is hoping to get that home at a fire sale price, thinking the couple will sell at a loss in order to keep from having the little girl placed in foster care.


57 posted on 04/03/2007 6:53:13 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

You said: Do you really think sending a 3 year old to a foster home is better than leaving her with the grandparents? I can’t believe we are talking about removing a child from the only family she has to satisfy HOA regs. This country’s soul is ill...
***

I am surprised to see this sort of statement on FR. This mother moved to the community prior to having a child, knowing (or being charged with the knowledge) that children were not allowed. She did not have to move there, but she did. THEN she decided to have a child (while apparently unmarried, her choice, her responsibility), prior to selling this home with the anti-child restrictions. I don’t think it is fair to blame the property owners who bought their property reasonably expecting not to have children living in the area. I don’t agree with their choice, but it was THERE choice to make.


58 posted on 04/03/2007 6:53:46 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
The law in Florida does not permit strict age discrimination in housing. Senior communities must allow under 50 residents up to 20% of the population.

I believe that's an option, not a requirement. They can go that high without losing their exemption from school taxes.

59 posted on 04/03/2007 6:54:13 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

It is really sad our older folks are removing themselves from everyone’s life. You would think older folks would enjoy youth around.

The problem is that we are encountering a generation in which many threw out traditional roles in order to do their own thing. Many didn’t parent their own children and they’re certainly not going to put up with other people’s children.


60 posted on 04/03/2007 6:54:50 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-371 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson