Replies

You said: Do you really think sending a 3 year old to a foster home is better than leaving her with the grandparents? I can’t believe we are talking about removing a child from the only family she has to satisfy HOA regs. This country’s soul is ill...
***

I am surprised to see this sort of statement on FR. This mother moved to the community prior to having a child, knowing (or being charged with the knowledge) that children were not allowed. She did not have to move there, but she did. THEN she decided to have a child (while apparently unmarried, her choice, her responsibility), prior to selling this home with the anti-child restrictions. I don’t think it is fair to blame the property owners who bought their property reasonably expecting not to have children living in the area. I don’t agree with their choice, but it was THERE choice to make.

Take your love of the childless-by-choice elsewhere. It is not FR. This country was founded with the blood and hard efforts of brave and selfless patriots for the sake of future generations. This three year old bastard is more dear to a real patriot then any of those heartless geezers.

Hello there.It’s not the mother that is living their.It’s the Grandparents that live there and took in their Grandbaby after it became apparent that the Mother was unable to care for her child do to being addicted to drugs.

I think this HOA is heartless and the Grandparents have been trying to sell their home and had no luck so far with a buyer.

I hope and pray that none of these heartless people in that neighborhood will ever have to experience excruciating circumstances, that would force them to take in their grandchildren,like these Grandparents have,because what is happening to these Grandparents could happen to anyone of them.

What goes around comes around.

“I am surprised to see this sort of statement on FR. This mother moved to the community prior to having a child, knowing (or being charged with the knowledge) that children were not allowed. She did not have to move there, but she did. THEN she decided to have a child (while apparently unmarried, her choice, her responsibility), prior to selling this home with the anti-child restrictions. I don’t think it is fair to blame the property owners who bought their property reasonably expecting not to have children living in the area. I don’t agree with their choice, but it was THERE choice to make.”

I can’t prove it, but my impression of the situation is somewhat different. I took from it that the grandparents were probably living in this house PRIOR to the child’s birth, so they were in compliance of the rules. It doesn’t mention the daughter( birth mom) living there so I formed a mental picture of her living apart from her family, being a druggie and becoming pregnant. After the birth of the child, and seeing that their daughter was too strung out to care for the baby, they stepped in and took her into their care. Not that it changes the ultimate situation, but that’s MHO.