The only weapons against the Democrats is the filibuster in the Senate and presidential veto.
It is very dangerous to have the Dems in power -- just imagine what they WILL do, if we have a Dem president and a filibuster proof Dem Senate.
To: FairOpinion
I doubt if he has the guts but we will see.
2 posted on
03/18/2007 10:27:32 AM PDT by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: FairOpinion
4 posted on
03/18/2007 10:31:43 AM PDT by
KoRn
(FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
To: FairOpinion
Don't just threaten...DO IT! Show us you have the guts to buck the dems. PLEASE!
6 posted on
03/18/2007 10:35:24 AM PDT by
Cricket24
(ULTRA PATRIOT!!)
To: FairOpinion
Dammit George, JUST DO IT!!! Threats don't mean a thing.
9 posted on
03/18/2007 10:42:11 AM PDT by
Ole Okie
To: FairOpinion
Most of the Democrats' bills won't make it past the Senate. Those that do will die from a presidential veto.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
10 posted on
03/18/2007 10:42:39 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: FairOpinion
I'm happy to hear this, but like most others am disappointed it took a Dem takeover to get to this.
To: FairOpinion
He gave them plenty when they were the minority.
I doubt he will veto. It is not in tune to the "new tone" ignoramous strategy.
14 posted on
03/18/2007 11:05:31 AM PDT by
lormand
(Michael Wiener - the tough talking populist moron, who claims to be a Conservative)
To: FairOpinion
He will only veto bills that hurt open border globalism or stops the North American Union!
15 posted on
03/18/2007 11:20:01 AM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: FairOpinion
It is very dangerous to have the Dems in power -- just imagine what they WILL do, if we have a Dem president and a filibuster proof Dem Senate.
Exactly. And if America elects Rudy, we WILL have a Dem president!!!
Glad to see you comin' around.
16 posted on
03/18/2007 11:20:40 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: FairOpinion
I bet he will defend America's borders, culture, and language - and veto Ted Kennedy's upcoming illegal-alien-amnesty and 3rd-world-migration-explosion bill.
Just kidding.
17 posted on
03/18/2007 11:24:50 AM PDT by
RodgerD
(Amnesty for 20 Million = de facto Mexico Merger = end of the USA = Treason)
To: FairOpinion
Why did they say "vetoes"? As far as I know there has been only one.
18 posted on
03/18/2007 11:30:49 AM PDT by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: FairOpinion
Did Georgie grow some conjones in the last few days? Or is he through kissing the Mexican President's ass long enough to notice that he might disagree with the demonrats' agenda to make the USA the USSA???
20 posted on
03/18/2007 11:32:08 AM PDT by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
To: FairOpinion
To: FairOpinion
Hint to libs: It's not just a threat.
23 posted on
03/18/2007 12:10:39 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: FairOpinion
Could it be???
Wake me up when it happens.
26 posted on
03/18/2007 12:28:00 PM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Drive By Media is America's worst enemy and American people don't know it.)
To: FairOpinion
Good, I'll send him a pack of Bic's in case he runs out of pens.
32 posted on
03/18/2007 1:09:22 PM PDT by
mware
(By all that you hold dear.. on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
To: FairOpinion
Mr. President, Just Say No. Use the Veto.
33 posted on
03/18/2007 1:16:15 PM PDT by
Psycheout
(Sam Brownback. Principled. Conservative. Republican.)
To: FairOpinion
What does President Bush have to lose by using his veto power? Is the media going to turn against him?!?!?
36 posted on
03/18/2007 2:29:57 PM PDT by
Constitutional Patriot
(Socialism is anti-American, and Democrats are socialists!!!)
To: FairOpinion
Good for Bush.
Clinton did not veto a single bill in his first 2 years with a Dem congress...the mere threat of a veto was effective for him (and Bush 43) in getting changes made before bills have been passed.
Bush won't cave to public opinion...if the Dems are successful in manhandling congress the white house will be flowing in red ink.
38 posted on
03/18/2007 5:05:35 PM PDT by
zendari
To: FairOpinion
I would rather have "actual veto's" of Democratic legislation! The minority Republican Congress must also actually get around to finally growing a political backbone for always!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
