Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Verdict in Libby Trial in....reading at noon. (Guilty On 4 of 5 Charges)
MSNBC

Posted on 03/06/2007 8:34:59 AM PST by Dog

Breaking on MSNBC


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: armitage; beltwayjustice; bushpardon; callwhitehouse; cialeak; contemptiblecourts; cooper; corn; doublestandard; elctnshaveconsqncs; fitzfong; fitzgerald; fitzmas; getbush; injustice; libby; lyingliars; miller; mitchell; movie; muckthefedia; nationalinsecurity; neomccarthyism; nojusticeforlibby; nomorenewtone; novak; ojjuryparttwo; pardon; pardonscooter; partisanwitchhunt; pincus; plame; plamegate; playingwithfire; pokingthebear; powell; puckflame; reporter; russert; scooterlibby; sharonstone; showtrial; slimeyjoe; stalinistmedia; trolls; tyranny; vengeance2008; washingtonpost; watchoutfortrolls; whataboutmarcrich; whynotberger; wilson; witchhunt; woodward; wuckfilson; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,341-1,342 next last
To: Eagles Talon IV
I believe Nixon was pardoned of any "possible" convictions that would have come about in a future trial. he was never tried and couldn't be because he was pardoned in advance. I this case the trial went forward and I suppose has to be completed including all appeals before a pardon can be issued.

So you are saying that a pardon is OK before a trial starts but not while it is in progress or after a conviction until all possible appeals have been resolved? Do you have some reference for this novel legal argument?

581 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:32 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

He IS????? WTF?


582 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:37 AM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Russert was just desperate to make sure HE wasn't indicted. He probably blubbered every name he could remember. But that still doesn't do Libby any good.


583 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:38 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Libby can appeal this and more than likely will. I was never interested in this case.


584 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:42 AM PST by Ptarmigan (Ptarmigans will rise again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Did you know he was with the WashPost before today? Did I miss that?


585 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:42 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

This is a totally "CHERRY PICKED" Jury! Held in DC. Where 89% voted Democrat last election. Talk about the need for a change of venue, or grounds for an appeal!


586 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:48 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

I don't think he should be pardoned...but the Marc Rich precedent is clear.


587 posted on 03/06/2007 9:57:57 AM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Juror: It was the RUSSERT/Libby conversation that was an important factor in the decision. I still think Russert lied.


588 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:04 AM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

when is a helen thomas pic coming up?


589 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:09 AM PST by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How could a reporter sit on the jury that was about statements to reporters, and NOT be biased?

And why wasn't he pre-empted?

590 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:09 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: rintense

I agree with you 100%.


591 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:13 AM PST by beansox (DOH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

rino? http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=NY&last=napolitano&first=andrew


592 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:21 AM PST by TwoSue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Dog

DemocRATS Plame and Wilson get off scot-free while sending an innocent pubby to jail. I suspect this horrible couple are celebrating in the offices of the hildebeast & puce pelosi.


593 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:31 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Sanctimonious damn liar. Thanks to Fitz:

Clown Wilson gets a rebirthday.

MSM wears a halo.

DemocratICKS get another shot at Vice President Cheney.



594 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:34 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

He said the jurors wanted to know where ROVE WAS.........FGS, just FGS.


595 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:39 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: rintense

"Where's Rove? Where are the other guys?"


596 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:47 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance
"How long do you really expect to keep this screenname?"

Looks like our friend RG made it for one post.

597 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:52 AM PST by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: zendari

Denis just said.. where is ROVE? Does that mean he had an idea before this was put before them???? BIASED JURY!!!!!!!!!


598 posted on 03/06/2007 9:58:54 AM PST by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

We are sick enough as it is.


599 posted on 03/06/2007 9:59:00 AM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: LS
I don't know if outing is an issue at all, the prosecution claimed he lied criminally and knowingly. I think that is near impossible to prove and considering how convoluted the whole situation was, I do not know why it was even a big deal.

It was a potential probably unknowing lie about a non-issue!

So why the prosecution?
600 posted on 03/06/2007 9:59:05 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,341-1,342 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson