Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Matt Drudge v. Al Gore
Wash Post ^ | February 28, 2007; 11:29 AM ET | Rob Anderson

Posted on 02/28/2007 9:16:10 AM PST by rface

The Drudge Report is known mostly as a wildly popular news outlet. Drudge lashed out at Gore after Gore's movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," took the Oscar for Best Documentary.

Citing a press release by the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, Drudge reports that Gore's Tennessee household uses twenty times as much energy as the average person's home, and that the former vice president's energy consumption has increased since the release of his anti-global warming film. "The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy," the report says. "In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh -- more than 20 times the national average."

Gore shot back at Drudge Monday through an interview with the liberal Web site ThinkProgress:

Responding to Drudge, Gore's office told ThinkProgress:

1) Gore's family has taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their private residence, including signing up for 100 percent green power through Green Power Switch, installing solar panels, and using compact fluorescent bulbs and other energy saving technology.

2) Gore has had a consistent position of purchasing carbon offsets to offset the family's carbon footprint -- a concept the right-wing fails to understand. Gore's office explains:

What Mr. Gore has asked is that every family calculate their carbon footprint and try to reduce it as much as possible. Once they have done so, he then advocates that they purchase offsets, to bring their footprint down to zero.

And then there's this comparison Rush Limbaugh made between Gore and President Bush on his radio program yesterday: "Compare Gore's mansion and Bush's modest 4,000 square foot little house on a ranch in Crawford. Who is it that is actually walking the walk here when it comes to conserving energy? It is not Al Gore."

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: nascarnation

Going carbon neutral is an easy way to take responsibility for the greenhouse gas emissions we create every time we drive our cars, take a plane, or turn on our computers. It's based on the principle that, since climate change is a global problem, an emission reduction made elsewhere has the same positive effect as one made locally.

Here's how it works: if you add polluting emissions to the atmosphere, you can effectively subtract them by purchasing 'carbon offsets'. Carbon offsets are simply credits for emission reductions achieved by projects elsewhere, such as wind farms, solar installations, or energy efficiency projects. By purchasing these credits, you can apply them to your own emissions and reduce your net climate impact.


61 posted on 02/28/2007 9:45:20 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rface
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Hmmm, Well Mr. Gore, I wouldn't worry too much about it. I think we can make this footprint disappear, but it will have some associated costs. On the upside, we'll provide you with a gold embossed certificate to use should you ever be challenged on the whereabouts of this here footprint. Like it never happened."

62 posted on 02/28/2007 9:45:44 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ; All

The ComPost didn't want to explain what those "Carbon Offsets" were. It sounds good until you learn the details.

What it means, according to a somewhat more detailed article published here yesterday (which hadn't yet edited out the inconvenient details) is that Gore has bought a lot of forest land, and the photosynthesis from his own personal trees makes up for the huge heating and air conditioning bills.

So, in order to "offset" their carbon use it means that everybody should go out and buy a few square miles of forest. Simple. If you have the millions in spare change like Gore does.

The leftist media also doesn't explain that gore inherited a huge bundle of stock in Occidental Petroleum, from his daddy, who worked for Armand Hammer and Uncle Joe Stalin. So he has plenty of money to buy land with. No problem.


63 posted on 02/28/2007 9:45:53 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rface
the "green power switch" is a scam too. right now it doesnt do anything. people who sign up for it are paying the extra money so that in the future some group can develop a greener energy source. He may be signed up, and he may be paying, but he is getting his juice from the same place everyone else is.

What I am suprised at is that he hasn't bothered to point out that a large part of the electricity generated here in TN is from hydroelectric rather than coal. I don't know how much of Nashville electric is hydro and how much is by burning fuel.

64 posted on 02/28/2007 9:46:58 AM PST by jdub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill
"Carbon offsets are like the payments the elites made in the Civil War to buy someone else off to serve in the Union Army for them."

OMG, I posted before reading your post. Great minds think alike. ;-D

65 posted on 02/28/2007 9:47:05 AM PST by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Please explain (someone!) what "carbon offsets" are.

They are Gore's version of Kerry's nuances. That means FReepers just cannot understand them at all, no matter how hard our addled brains try.

(I say this only because I see you've already gotten the technically correct answer. LOL.)

66 posted on 02/28/2007 9:47:05 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
It's basically a modern version of buying an Indulgence from the medieval Catholic Church. Gore is saying that he can continue to have a huge carbon footprint, because he paid some company to send him a certificate saying that they'd take his money, and use it to reduce carbon emissions somewhere.
67 posted on 02/28/2007 9:47:10 AM PST by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
How/where do I buy carbon offsets to sell?


68 posted on 02/28/2007 9:47:47 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
Rush's belief that 4000 ft represents a modest home only proves that he lives in an entirely different world from the rest of us.

Very True. But, Rush isn't trying to sell anyone on the moral equivocation of carbon credits that the wealthy can trade to make themselves feel good about their own hypocracy.
69 posted on 02/28/2007 9:49:09 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Fifth Generation Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rlpfly

So that's not the amount of food he consumes, either?


70 posted on 02/28/2007 9:49:43 AM PST by wastedyears ( Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bat_Chemist

ATTENTION LURKING LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS:

Due to my energy efficient lifestyle, and I will sell them to the first Lib that sends a Money Order for $3,995.00 to:

Fleece-A-Liberal.Org
PO Box 69
Santa Claus, Indiana

Act FAST, and ease your Liberal guilt, today!


71 posted on 02/28/2007 9:50:03 AM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

CRAP!! Screwed up the joke!
The first line should have read:

"Due to my energy efficient lifestyle, I have many Carbon Credits available...."


72 posted on 02/28/2007 9:51:03 AM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rface

On another thread, someone likened carbon offsets to eating huge fattening deserts -- then paying someone else to go on a diet.


73 posted on 02/28/2007 9:52:01 AM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

>>Gore has had a consistent position of purchasing carbon offsets<<

No one seems to be asking the critical question here: who is he purchasing the offsets from?


74 posted on 02/28/2007 9:52:04 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill
Algore probably pays somebody to use corncobs so that he and Tipper can use extra soft perfumed toilet paper.

ROFL! Nominating this for the Phrase of the Day!

75 posted on 02/28/2007 9:53:03 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rface

Al Gore, the Carbon Foot Whore.


76 posted on 02/28/2007 9:53:53 AM PST by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado
How To Illustrate the Absurdity of Carbon Offsets

Flood eBay with offerings! One doofus is selling carbon offsets for not driving his pickup for a day. The offsets are printed on letter-size parchment and go for $0.99.

Shipping, OTOH, is $4.05!

77 posted on 02/28/2007 9:54:43 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Fast track that impeachment boys! We got a war to win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rface

Hmmmmm.....wonder if ole' Al purchased "offsets" for the total redo of his Living Room as shown in a January 2005 House Beautiful Magazine article. Why couldn't they have re-used their curtains, furniture, etc....instead of purchasing soooo much new stuff? (I found this last night going through old mags I have.)


78 posted on 02/28/2007 9:55:11 AM PST by goodnesswins (We need to cure Academentia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
So, in order to "offset" their carbon use it means that everybody should go out and buy a few square miles of forest. Simple. If you have the millions in spare change like Gore does.

The forest is already in place - so the net effect is zero. The only way Gore could justify this is for him to purchase land with no vegetation and then plant trees.

79 posted on 02/28/2007 9:56:23 AM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: avacado

"the biggest scam since snake-oil" Are you saying that ALGORE is a snake-oil salesman? :)


80 posted on 02/28/2007 9:57:05 AM PST by samanella ((Iraq: Brave Soldiers, Vital Cause, Gutless Politicians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson