Posted on 02/28/2007 7:54:19 AM PST by Al Simmons
..why thank you, Al
BTW you were a great baseball player...
I am well aware of that passage, EV. Now, don't you think it's TIME for you to answer my question? Who are you FOR?
Do I detect a note of sarcasm? #:>0
I wish it was time for you to stfu you fifth columist disruptor.
He already explained why he thought he was a socialist. In the full quote, Jim explained:
"Wants to control free speech, regulate or ban guns, seize private property, use the heavy hand of government to control, regulate private industry, wants to award special rights to homosexuals accelerating the breakdown of moral society, he devalues and degrades human life, claims there is a constitutional right to abortion, is even ok with ripping unborn babies limb from limb and or sucking their brains out. The man is a socialist."
I've got to agree. Such views are those of a socialist.
Now there's an intelligent response.
Common Tator is gone??? Really?? One less Rino around here to fight and feud with??? I knew this would be a good day.
When Liberal Republicans vote no different than Liberal Democrats, I don't see where my political support of this party has been either
A. Appreciated
B. Desired
Therefore if another Liberal Republican is nominated for the Presidancy, I will not support them.
Like I told you the other day, old man. Watch that blood pressure.
Common Tator was a well-known FR liberal and a prolific poster on this site for years.
You are right, youngjim, Common Tator was no liberal, and the depths EV will go to disparage someone is despicable.
Well, need to be careful about that. I understand he has some health issues. He's in my prayers, even if we disagreed on pretty much everything politically.
You and I usually disagree, but I do think Fred Thompson could save us from all this.
Right now, I'm for saving the Republican Party from the certain destruction it faces if it thumbs its nose at pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun constitutional conservatives.
but times change - the 'Rats won by grabbing a bigger share of the middle in 2006 - unless we do the same we're gonna go down in 2008.
THAT is the lesson of the 2006 elections...
You, as a fifth columnist disruptor, use JR positions to attempt to divide FReepers. I've read all of JR posts, and while disappointed that he gives fifth columnist scum the fodder to divide, I do support all the things he has said, and his assurance that he will be voting in the general. Evie, you fifth columnist, I support Duncan Hunter in spite of your vitriol, deceit and disruption. Jim has made all of his posts without the filthy alienating tactics you fifth columnist disruptors employ.
I disagree with the moniker...RINO...you can say "social conservative in name only", but Republicans come in all shapes and sizes and the Republican Party encompasses more than one or two issues.
On this site, however, if a Republican differs from one plank in a strict conservative platform, they are tarred and feathered.
Me thinks you are confusing Republicanism with conservatism. The Republicans are closer in line with a conservative agenda than the democratic party will ever be, but they are not one in the same.
We only know each other according to screen names. There probably wouldn't be half the fighting going on here if people knew each other a bit better, and could find some common ground.
Unfortunately, the nature of politics doesn't allow for much of that.
If history is any indicator, my guess would be after all the primaries are over and before the conventions begin.
"Ain't that the truth."
Unless of course, they are also interested in national survival (WOT), and believe that Rudy will appoint conservative judges.
BTW, Nino fan - I had the great pleasure to meet and discuss Constitutional law with both Judge Bork and then Judge Scalia at the 1985 Federalist Convention in DC. Its a tragedy that Bork was kept off the bench due to 'Rat character assassination. How the decisions might have gone differently had he, and not Kennedy, been there since 1987....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.