1 posted on
02/14/2007 10:45:09 AM PST by
dead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: dead
That's supposed to look like Elizabeth Taylor??
2 posted on
02/14/2007 10:46:48 AM PST by
econjack
To: dead
3 posted on
02/14/2007 10:46:59 AM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: dead
Well wealth and power tend to offset other qualities
To: dead
dang..helen thomas shoulda played cleo instead of liz...
5 posted on
02/14/2007 10:47:46 AM PST by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info..)
To: dead
Just remember that in not so ancient days, an overweight woman was considered sexy. Don't apply our penthouse ideals to the ancients.
8 posted on
02/14/2007 10:48:43 AM PST by
USMMA_83
(Tantra is my fetish ;))
To: dead
Separated at birth?
10 posted on
02/14/2007 10:49:08 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(Global warming turns people gay.)
To: dead
It was her bedroom skills, no doubt.
11 posted on
02/14/2007 10:49:58 AM PST by
Thumper1960
(Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
To: dead
"How'm I doin'?"
To: dead
Lot a rub marks on the coin. Wonder what was being rubbed?
15 posted on
02/14/2007 10:51:51 AM PST by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: dead
Oh she doesn't look so bad. Have you seen Elizabeth Taylor lately? I'd rather have the original for a Valentine date.
16 posted on
02/14/2007 10:52:37 AM PST by
Monterrosa-24
( ...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
To: dead
Cleopatra's allure was not due to her physical beauty, but a combination of her wealth, power, skills with make-up, ability to attune herself to a man's personality, and most probably bed room skills.
18 posted on
02/14/2007 10:53:20 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(] Tagline Under Construction [)
To: dead
Standards of beauty change over time. Fat chicks used to be considered beautiful. In addition, beauty is comparative. She may have been one of the more beautiful of her day. Any picture I've seen of a woman from the 19th century looks hideous by today's standards. I tend to believe that each generation gets progressively more attractive.
19 posted on
02/14/2007 10:53:35 AM PST by
aynrandfreak
(Who would turn out better if we split into two separate countries based on the '04 Presidential Map?)
To: dead
(Oooof! She looked like Ed Koch) Ah, crap, now I have to carry that thought around in my head all day. Ceasar being seduced by Ed Koch. Antony running away with Ed Koch. I need a drink...
20 posted on
02/14/2007 10:54:31 AM PST by
AzSteven
To: dead
Ancient coin contradicts legend of Cleopatra's beauty
(Oooof! She looked like Ed Koch)
Marc Antony must have had the "Banker Drysdale" (of the "Beverly
Hillbillies") attitude:
"Show me a person with a million dollars...and I'll show you
a beautiful person!"
25 posted on
02/14/2007 10:58:38 AM PST by
VOA
To: dead
Did they have the ability to accurately portray her?
26 posted on
02/14/2007 10:58:52 AM PST by
Perdogg
(Happy 2007.11)
To: dead
27 posted on
02/14/2007 10:59:11 AM PST by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: dead
30 posted on
02/14/2007 11:03:34 AM PST by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: dead
To: dead
Liz made a much better
Cleo.
39 posted on
02/14/2007 11:17:34 AM PST by
BigFinn
(Libs: Big Hats, No Cattle.)
To: dead
For anyone who knows the process used to create coins in those days -- How likely is it that the person who created the picture for the coin had never actually seen Cleopatra?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
.jpg)
