Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Gov. Rick Perry's Huge Mistake"
The Collins Report ^ | Feb. 9, 2007 | Donna Garner

Posted on 02/09/2007 11:23:00 AM PST by jmaroneps37

Governor Perry has made a huge mistake in signing an executive order which mandates that all sixth-grade girls entering public schools by the fall of 2008 must be vaccinated for Human Papilloma Virus with Gardasil a product of Merck Pharmaceuticals.

A public debate in the Legislature should have preceded such a drastic move, all ……. careful consideration.

Parents are being told, "We do not expect nor believe that you will stay abstinent until marriage."

The decision to get young girls vaccinated for HPV is not an easy…. In less than a year since approval, 82 cases of serious adverse events following HPV vaccinations of Gardasil have been reported. These incidents should have been discussed thoroughly in open forum in the Legislature before any mandate was even considered.

(http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?PAGENO=1&PERPAGE=10&VAX=HPV4).

Parents need to evaluate all aspects of the HPV vaccine.. there are no long-term studies yet on the way these sixth graders might be affected in future years when [they] have their own babies. Since the vaccine has only followed girls for five years, nobody knows for sure how long the vaccination may last ...

HPV vaccine only covers 4 of 30 types of HPV which account for 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts. That still leaves 30% of cervical cancers and 10% of genital warts … not covered.

A definite drawback to Gardasil is that girls must get three full doses of the vaccine for it to be effective. How many families are going to understand the urgency of making sure their girls get three full doses over a six months' period of time?

The seriousness of HPV has been one of the driving forces behind the plea for teens to remain abstinent until marriage. Condoms do not offer …

(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: gardasil; hpv; merck; rickperry; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: RWR8189
If we can eliminate 70% of cervical cancer through this vaccination, I don't see the downside in such a vaccination.

What about if there was a vaccine for genital herpes, syphilis, or gonorrhea? Provided the vaccines were safe and there were no serious side effects, would you be in favor of forcing teenage girls to get this vaccination?

21 posted on 02/09/2007 11:42:20 AM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
But I thought Perry was a great conservative - that's what I kept hearing on FR before the election...

Maybe from the head in the sand people. I've been to six State Conventions and work for 1 or 2 candidates every year. For the first time in my 36 years of voting, I voted against the Republican for Governor.

22 posted on 02/09/2007 11:43:30 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

It's good if you're a Merck stockholder.


23 posted on 02/09/2007 11:44:17 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"If we can eliminate 70% of cervical cancer through this vaccination, I don't see the downside in such a vaccination".

...the problem that you and a lot of Freepers are having with this is...WHERE'S THE LONG RANGE PROOF THAT THIS WOULD WORK IN THE 1ST PLACE!! Because the FDA says so?! This is all about the $$$. The side effects of such a vaccine are not being discussed. The long term effects of such a vaccine are not being discussed. Even if they were, the gummit has no idea.


24 posted on 02/09/2007 11:44:25 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Sorry for the double post, but I went to the CDC site, and even they don't seem to have complete info on the vaccine.

http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vaccine/vac-chart-public.htm


25 posted on 02/09/2007 11:44:26 AM PST by USMCWife6869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

There isn't a downside to the vaccination. The downside is the government ordering you to have your child be given the vaccination! Outrageous.


26 posted on 02/09/2007 11:45:21 AM PST by go-dubya-04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USMCWife6869

My girl is 33 and I don't recall it at all.


27 posted on 02/09/2007 11:45:23 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
That was only from such great conservative thinkers such as Mr. Squat and Begone...

I believe a land slide was predicted by them and all of us that called Goodhair a RINO were blessed with IQ's of less than 70.

BTW, If you add in the 'None of the Above' votes, such as my wife's, Pretty boy did not get 39%.
28 posted on 02/09/2007 11:45:39 AM PST by CenTex (Goodhair ... Bad news... See ya' March 2nd in Austin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
What do you tell a little girl who wants to know why she is being given this injection?

"This will keep you from getting a bad disease. Just like the shots you got for diptheria, whooping cough, polio, measles, mumps and chicken pox when you were little. "

Is it really that freaking complicated?

29 posted on 02/09/2007 11:46:21 AM PST by ReignOfError (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie
I'd have to be carted off to jail then.

It might be a tad easier to just opt out, as is provided for by the law.

30 posted on 02/09/2007 11:46:25 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tolkien
Just like the RINO's that are being offered up as presidential candidates...the lesser of two evils
31 posted on 02/09/2007 11:47:53 AM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: jmaroneps37

"If this vaccine had been around when I was young I might still be a yell leader now -"
Real Perry Quote (really)
34 posted on 02/09/2007 11:49:51 AM PST by GulfBreeze (I Like Duncan Hunter for the GOP Presidential Nomination in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
If we can eliminate 70% of cervical cancer through this vaccination, I don't see the downside in such a vaccination.

Because it's never been tested on prepubescent girls?

Gardasil HPV Vaccine Reduced Infection and Disease in New Clinical Study Article Date: 07 Apr 2005 - 9:00 PST

In the study, 552 women in the United States, Europe and Brazil between the ages of 16 and 23 were randomized to receive vaccine or placebo at Day 1, Month 2, and Month 6.

Merck's HPV Vaccine in Phase III Trial 100% Effective for Two Strains Causing 70% of Cervical Cancer CasesArticle Date: 09 Oct 2005 - 19:00 PST

enrolled 12,167 women ages 16 to 26 in 13 countries

V501 (Gardasil) Study in Preadolescent Females This study is currently recruiting patients.Verified by Merck February 2007

Official Title: V501 (Gardasil) Phase II Immunogenicity Study in Females Aged 9 to 17 Years

Study start: December 2006

35 posted on 02/09/2007 11:50:38 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Chris Bell praised Goodhair's move. 'Nuff said.

Maybe Governor Kinky wouldn't have been such a bad idea, after all.


36 posted on 02/09/2007 11:53:52 AM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
The impression that Perry had given from this distance was that he was a fool. He merely confirmed the impression.

The vaccine may be a good idea, but there needs to be parental consent, not any of this state mandated rubbish.

Regards, Ivan

37 posted on 02/09/2007 11:54:50 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

"...teens to remain abstinent until marriage..."

What an absolute novel concept!!!


38 posted on 02/09/2007 11:56:50 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
If we can eliminate 70% of cervical cancer through this vaccination, I don't see the downside in such a vaccination.

Which would seem, in itself, a wonderful thing.

The mortality rate for cervical cancer is one half of one percent. Most of those cases were women who didn't have regular pap tests.

Of the 80% HPV infection rate, 70% clear up on their own.

Injecting the entire populace for something with a low mortality rate that can currently be achieved using less expensive methods?

Sounds like another one of Perry Pompadour's boondoggles.

(In my state's defense, our choices for Governor WERE Larry, Moe, and Curly-ette :-)

39 posted on 02/09/2007 12:07:59 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am not an administrative, public, corporate or legal 'person'.....and neither are my children!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

So that he can become a Merck lobbyist and make some real money.


40 posted on 02/09/2007 12:14:45 PM PST by 353FMG (I never met a liberal I didn't dislike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson