To: BladeLWS
Good.
I'll support RG as long as he puts people like Roberts and Scalia on the Court.
To: katieanna
I'll support RG as long as he puts people like Roberts and Scalia on the Court. Rush saying the same thing -- we need a person like Reagan on the world scene in the future to fight the WOT. Problem is there is no Reagan out there right now. Rudy may be the right person and can overcome objections of social conservatives by committing to appoint people like Roberts and Scalia. But Rush finishes by saying it is way too early for him to be talking about this (the 2008 election) on his show all the time let alone endorsing anyone.
44 posted on
02/05/2007 11:21:23 AM PST by
CedarDave
(California wants to ban light bulbs. If passed they will never have a bright idea.)
To: katieanna
I'll support RG as long as he puts people like Roberts and Scalia on the Court.Just a question--since Rudy's pro-abortion and pro-gay-marriage, do you think he'll nominate true conservatives to the courts? Don't get me wrong, I really like his support for combatting the war against Islamofascism, but that and his staunch law-and-order work as mayor are, to my knowledge, his only proven conservative positions. Tell me if I'm wrong, please!
52 posted on
02/05/2007 11:23:27 AM PST by
American Quilter
(You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
To: katieanna
"I'll support RG as long as he puts people like Roberts and Scalia on the Court."
I think there is plenty of evidence that he won't do that. There have been other threads where some freepers (who are much more knowledgeable than I am on this) have provided evidence to this. Perhaps they will come out of the woodwork and post this again.
68 posted on
02/05/2007 11:27:43 AM PST by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson