Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Giuliani Files Statement for Candidacy for President
Posted on 02/05/2007 11:06:50 AM PST by BladeLWS
Breaking on Fox News. Giuliani Files Statement of Candidacy for President
No article yet.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aborter; abortion; adulterer; anti2ndamendment; anticatholic; anyonebutrudy; asureloser; baggage; berniekerik; bigmouth; cheat; corruption; demican; duncansureloser; duncanwillneverwin; eastcoastliberal; election; electionpresident; gaymarriage; giuliani; giuliani2008; greatleader; greatmayorlousyprez; italian; liberal; mafia; mobties; nationalsecurity; newtgingrich; nextpresident; nyscks; presidentrudy; pretender; rudy; rudy4prez; rudyinadress; scandalsgalore; shadyfriends; statist; unelectable; whocares; willneverwin; womanizer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620, 621-637 next last
To: MittFan08
McCain is the absolute worst kind of RINO- an unstable renegade RINO who likes to rub his RINOness in the face of conservatives and ask them how they like it (e.g. Gang of 14, McCain-Kennedy Bill). McCain is my Senator, but I don't have to tell any of you how unreliable he is.
The thing that I loath about McCain is his constant shifting. Just when you need him, you cross your fingers to hope he will be steadfast and wallah... he joins the Dems, urinates down our backs and tells us it's raining.
I don't think I can pull the switch for an abortion proponent, unless I knew for sure he was going to further the cause for life by appointing the proper judges (which the jury is still out) but I will tell you, if any of you think McCain will appoint anyone better than Rudy to the court???...... Just remember how many times he screwed us when he was suppose to be with us.
Conclusion - Don't vote McCain over Giuliani. He's no more conservative, maybe less.
601
posted on
02/05/2007 11:11:56 PM PST
by
Bassfan
(No cheese please)
To: BladeLWS
602
posted on
02/05/2007 11:15:06 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: My GOP
You only know what you WANT to believe about Rudy Rockefeller.
603
posted on
02/05/2007 11:23:50 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(NO to Rudy in 2008! The politics of Rockefeller and the attitude of a Gambino.)
To: mysterio
Begins? It BEGAN way before now!
604
posted on
02/05/2007 11:39:26 PM PST
by
Just Lori
(Liberal ideals: .................. Less liberty............more slavery.)
To: George W. Bush
He's probably running as a Republican because the DemoSocialist Party's field is too crowded. In any event, he's not a "choice" for Republicans - he's practically a clone of Hillary Clintonista.
To: DCPatriot
Wrong. There isn't two cents worth of difference beteween Giuliani and Hillary Clintonista.
To: pleikumud
Not a whit of difference between the two, eh?
How did Hillary vote on Alito and Roberts?
How would Giuliani have voted?
THERE'S your difference, pal. Now pick up your toys and go home.
607
posted on
02/06/2007 6:06:59 AM PST
by
Gunder
To: Old_Mil
You should revise that to read: THE CLINTON'S ARE COMING.
To: freeperfromnj
Don't think so. Wonder what Paul would think about the beginning and end of Rudy's candidacy?
To purchase a gun in the State of New York you have to give your full name, your date of birth, your residence, your occupation. You have to prove that you're a United States citizen, you have to show you are of good character, competency and integrity. And you have to demonstrate a real need for the weapon.
And thanks in part to our stricter gun control laws, crime is down dramatically in New York City. Shootings are down over 50 percent. Murder is down over 50 percent...
We need a federal law that bans all assault weapons, and if in fact you do need a handgun you should be subjected to at least the same restrictions -- and really stronger ones...
-Rudy Giuliani
The Mayor's WINS Address
Sunday, March 2nd, 1997
609
posted on
02/06/2007 7:07:01 AM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: Old_Mil
When was the last time a GOP presidential candidate did not get the endorsement from the NRA and GOA?
610
posted on
02/06/2007 7:27:57 AM PST
by
tfelice
To: tfelice
There's a first time for everything. When was the last time a Republican presidential candidate was this liberal?
611
posted on
02/06/2007 7:38:42 AM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: Old_Mil
There have been some in the past, but the never register on the radar screen. Seems the heart & soul of the GOP is at stake here. From a broad perspective the Democratic Party has moved left to become the Socialist Party of the late 1950's and the GOP is about where the Dems were at that time. The Dems did it progressively over the last 50 years or so, the GOP on the other hand has been in accelerated mode since '95 or so.
612
posted on
02/06/2007 8:01:07 AM PST
by
tfelice
To: Charles Henrickson
I feel the very same way as does most of my friends. But people who voted for Bush,not republicans,hate his guts right now and as longs as Iraq is in turmoil they will go back to voting for the dems. For me I wish we had a strong military leader who was conservative to lead the country. The whole homosexuality movement under Rudi scares the hell out of me. The more pro-homosexual this country goes,the more it will lead to a direct assault on the churches. In other words they will not be allowed to say no to gay marriages. So I guess pray,pray,pray.
613
posted on
02/06/2007 8:07:33 AM PST
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: stanz
Sauce on corn flakes? Ick is that ya gotta be Italian? I mean I am Irish and know were kinda weird at times but?
614
posted on
02/06/2007 8:44:05 AM PST
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: red irish
Just a joke, friend. But we do use tomato sauce a lot!
615
posted on
02/06/2007 9:03:58 AM PST
by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: Old_Mil
We need a federal law that bans all assault weapons, and if in fact you do need a handgun you should be subjected to at least the same restrictions -- and really stronger ones... -Rudy Giuliani
If gunowners don't understand these are his true sentiments, they will face a very tough time. If they allow Giuliani to grow in support or go unchallenged it will encourage the Dims to renew their assault on the Second Amendment. At present, they're still too gun-shy.
If you value the Second, Giuliani must be rejected.
To: tfelice
I agree! Do we as Americans have the right to have standards on those we wish to hold the highest position of power in this country? There are those who wish only to beat Hillery and I must say I agree with that idea. But it saddens me that I have to hold my nose or give up what I believe in the most because my party has lost it's soul. If there is another attack between now and the election all bets are off,it will go head on for Rudi. This country will not elect a woman when security is at risk even though it is right now. But after another attack no Hillery. And I am a woman who would never vote for Hillery even if I had a gun to my head.
617
posted on
02/06/2007 9:20:50 AM PST
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: Peach
So many people in this country have no idea what any candidate stands for. I know people who will vote for Hillery just because she is a woman and know nothing else. Makes me sick. Especially with all the info on the internet! But then today politics has nothing to do with the people of this country that goes without saying when one looks at the border situation. But I strongly believe another attack and this country will not vote for a woman to be commander and chief and I am a woman.
618
posted on
02/06/2007 10:20:32 AM PST
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: red irish
You're right. An awful lot of female Oprah-like voters out there and it's very disturbing.
619
posted on
02/06/2007 10:25:12 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: red irish
I could vote for a Maggie Thatcher. And a number of European queens were pretty warlike.
Just because America doesn't seem to be producing smart tough women in politics doesn't mean a woman can't do the job. I think the reason we aren't producing those women in politics is a strange hangover effect from the Fifties where women are somehow supposed to be more moral, more inclined toward peace, more enlightened. But this ties their hands in being able to present a tougher side to the voters. I blame feminism for having failed to liberate women from June Cleaverism. If women are truly to be equals to men in every way, they also have to be free to be strong and aggressive on defense. Otherwise, they are the captives of a policially correct gulag. June Cleaver with a health plan and a 'dialog' with voters just can't compete with a Margaret Thatcher.
It's also women voters more than men who hold women politicians back from being strong on defense and ruthless on those who attack us.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620, 621-637 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson