Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lab Disaster May Lead to New Cancer Drug
Reuters ^ | Feb 4, 2007 | Maggie Fox

Posted on 02/04/2007 11:45:52 AM PST by anymouse

Her carefully cultured cells were dead and Katherine Schaefer was annoyed, but just a few minutes later, the researcher realized she had stumbled onto a potential new cancer treatment.

Schaefer and colleagues at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York believe they have discovered a new way to attack tumors that have learned how to evade existing drugs.

Tests in mice suggest the compound helps break down the cell walls of tumors, almost like destroying a tumor cell's "skeleton."

The researchers will test the new compound for safety and hope they can develop it to treat cancers such as colon cancer, esophageal cancer, liver and skin cancers.

"I was using these cancer cells as models of the normal intestine," Schaefer said in a telephone interview.

Normal human cells are difficult to grow and study in the lab, because they tend to die. But cancer cells live much longer and are harder to kill, so scientists often use them.

Schaefer was looking for drugs to treat the inflammation seen in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, both of which cause pain and diarrhea.

She was testing a compound called a PPAR-gamma modulator. It would never normally have been thought of as a cancer drug, or in fact a drug of any kind.

"I made a calculation error and used a lot more than I should have. And my cells died," Schaefer said.

A colleague overheard her complaining. "The co-author on my paper said,' Did I hear you say you killed some cancer?' I said 'Oh', and took a closer look."

They ran several tests and found the compound killed "pretty much every epithelial tumor cell lines we have seen," Schaefer said. Epithelial cells line organs such as the colon, and also make up skin.

It also killed colon tumors in mice without making the mice sick, they reported in the journal International Cancer Research.

The compound works in much the same way as the taxane drugs, including Taxol, which were originally derived from Pacific yew trees.

"It targets part of the cell cytoskeleton called tubulin," Schaefer said. Tubulin is used to build microtubules, which in turn make up the cell's structure.

Destroying it kills the cell, but cancer cells eventually evolve mechanisms to pump out the drugs that do this, a problem called resistance.

"Resistance to anti-tubulin therapies is a huge problem in many cancers. We see this as another way to get to the tubulin," Schaefer said.

The PPAR-gamma compound does this in a different way from the taxanes, which might mean it could overcome the resistance that tumor cells often develop to chemotherapy.

"Most of the drugs like Taxol affect the ability of tubulin to forms into microtubules. This doesn't do that -- it causes the tubulin itself to disappear. We do not know why."

Schaefer's team plans more safety tests in mice. As the compound is already patented, her team will probably have to design something slightly different to be able to patent it as a new drug.

Taxol, developed by U.S. National Cancer Institute researchers and manufactured by Bristol-Myers Squibb in 1993, had annual sales of $1.6 billion at its peak in 2000.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bigpharm; cancer; cancercure; crohnsdisease; health; medicine; research; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: anymouse

bttt


21 posted on 02/04/2007 2:03:13 PM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

A question for all my fellow Freepers: After reading this article about finding a cure for Cancer, the question just popped into my head, being a cancer survivor myself also my wife has worked for an Oncologist for 14 years and I just asked her. In these tests, how do they give the mice the different forms of Cancer? My wife could not answer the question and she told me to drop it because she did not want to get freaked out.


22 posted on 02/04/2007 2:16:19 PM PST by rambo316 (The Blessed Mother is Queen of heaven and earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
cancer cells eventually evolve mechanisms to pump out the drugs

You'd best take that sentence out. Believing that cells evolve is religion.

23 posted on 02/04/2007 2:47:47 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
Fleming left the window in his lab open one night and some spores got blown into his culture dishes. The mold killed his cultures, like you said, and he became interested in the "why" it did the killing.

Another thing that is interesting is the noting that Cancer cells can be "immortal" in the lab, because they grow so fast. There are cells called He-La, that were grown from a woman's cancer for years after she died.

24 posted on 02/04/2007 2:49:23 PM PST by boop (Now Greg, you know I don't like that WORD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rambo316
In these tests, how do they give the mice the different forms of Cancer?

They use nude mice which gets its name because it has no hair. Nude mice have no thymus gland and therefore cannot generate mature T lymphocytes. Therefore they are unable to mount most types of immune responses. The absence of functioning T cells prevents nude mice from rejecting not only allografts (from other nude mice), but they cannot even reject xenografts; that is, grafts of tissue from another species.

Human cancer cells grown in culture can be injected subcutaneously into the nude mouse, and will grow to form a human tumor in the mice. This allows researchers to test a variety of cancer drugs on the mouse and see what happens to the human cancer. One can also grow skin cells from other species in the nude mouse. For example, you can get cells from a chicken, inject them into the mouse, and it will grow feathers on the skin.

25 posted on 02/04/2007 3:06:23 PM PST by SC DOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
Does this refer to tumors already in a person or is it talking about the ones formed initially? How would a tumor develop a resistence to a cancer treatment unless the cancer had been previously exposed to the drug. If that's the case, cancer would have to be a disease that's transmitted from person to person.

The immunity comes from evolution through natural selection. When someone with cancers is given chemotherapy, cancer cells die. But not always all of them. A few cancer cells may have a variation that lets them survive the chemo. They continue to reproduce and the cancer comes bsck. This time, though, the cancer is descended from the few cells that were immune to chemo the first time so repeat chemo has almost no success the second time around.

26 posted on 02/04/2007 3:30:39 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rambo316

After reading your post, I think you may also be interested in this thread:

"Cheap, Safe Drug Kills Most Cancers"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1778434/posts


27 posted on 02/04/2007 4:58:56 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Thanks for the post, bump for later reading & kill 2 birds with one stone.


28 posted on 02/04/2007 5:22:13 PM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; All
Some time ago, someone posted a link to an animation of the internal workings of a cell. It was absolutely fascinating.

I didn't bookmark it, and I cannot find it. Anyone help me out?

29 posted on 02/04/2007 8:33:13 PM PST by Jotmo (I Had a Bad Experience With the CIA and Now I'm Gonna Show You My Feminine Side - Swirling Eddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; All
Some time ago, someone posted a link to an animation of the internal workings of a cell. It was absolutely fascinating.

I didn't bookmark it, and I cannot find it. Anyone help me out?

30 posted on 02/04/2007 8:33:24 PM PST by Jotmo (I Had a Bad Experience With the CIA and Now I'm Gonna Show You My Feminine Side - Swirling Eddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Thanks! Cool news!


31 posted on 02/04/2007 10:04:27 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Just an observation,.
If they could make this compound with a limited lifespan,
then inject directly into the tumor, it seems possible so long
as it doesn't kill everything else it contacts due to the body's own abilities
to attack anything obscure.

I appreciate any cancer breakthrough.

God Bless America,
MaxMax.

32 posted on 02/04/2007 10:15:38 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I think X-Rays were discovered by accident.


33 posted on 02/04/2007 10:21:28 PM PST by skr (Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I wonder how many of science's greatest discoveries were "accidents".

Most of them, at least in chemistry.

34 posted on 02/04/2007 10:25:47 PM PST by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Every now and then in pharmacological research, failure leads to success. IIRC, the drug company SK&F was near bankruptcy and they were testing a new drug as a heart medication. It failed miserably, but it seemed that some in the test group also had ulcers, and the new medication seemed to help them quite a bit. That medication later became known as Tagamet, and quite literally saved the company, and went on to be one of the best selling drugs in history.

Mark

35 posted on 02/04/2007 10:27:21 PM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Interesting. I wonder how many of science's greatest discoveries were "accidents". Assuming it proves to be safe and effective, I hope this gets on a fast track through whatever route they take it and it gets to patients quickly.

Lexan, Gortex, there are quite a few...

Mark

36 posted on 02/04/2007 10:28:08 PM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
...but this just sounds like greed getting in the way of good medicine.

Along with death and taxes...that is one thing you can always count on.

Do some reading on dichloroacetate. It's being looked at as a new cancer treatment as well.

DCA attacks a unique feature of cancer cells: the fact that they make their energy throughout the main body of the cell, rather than in distinct organelles called mitochondria. This process, called glycolysis, is inefficient and uses up vast amounts of sugar.

Let's watch and see how quickly this compound comes through trials and gets approved by the FDA.

37 posted on 02/04/2007 10:29:50 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Res firma mitescere nescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC DOC

Thanks for the info. It is mind boggling, this stuff. About the cancer though, why do doctors say that Cancer surviviors cannot donate blood?

Again, thanks for all the info and have a nice day.


38 posted on 02/05/2007 2:05:05 AM PST by rambo316 (The Blessed Mother is Queen of heaven and earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

LOL Fleming was a sloppy scientist who didn't clean his petri dishes :)

That's what got us penicilin!


39 posted on 02/05/2007 2:15:09 AM PST by twinzmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I wonder how many of science's greatest discoveries were "accidents".

Penicillin was discovered by accident.

40 posted on 02/05/2007 5:31:18 AM PST by painter (We celebrate liberty which comes from God not from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson