problem is he is not a conservative
And just what Neal, did Bush say about that income equality? Did he say it was up to the gov't to regulate it or did he say that CEO salaries should be set by the BODs and be based on performance?
Neil knows that the republican party is dead and doesn't admit it. The time has come for a new political party for conservatives only.
He nailed it on this one.
He's simply discussing it, and it is rather good he brings it to the table. There's a wide gap between discussing this and asking for legislation that would alter it. Bush is sounding an alarm to the wealthy to make changes on their own or possibly face a future where the choice is taken from their control.
Lest anyone forget, there was such a disparity over a century ago, and it was used by liberals to win elective offices. If the gap is lessoned voluntarily it would negate this issue in the 2008 campaigns.
I'm not President Bush's greatest admirer by any stretch, but sounding a word of caution on the widening disparity is something a good leader would do.
"And Bush is supposed to be a conservative?"
But don't forget, GW's a COMPASSIONATE conservative which I guess means he feels the pain of the down trodden just like Democraps do !!!
"When they join our Corps, Marines expect to train, deploy and fight. That's who we are. That's what we do.
Commandant of the Marines
Bush #1 did the same thing. Getting along with liberals means abandoning all class and conscience. Let us pray for our Union.
Apparently, that capital Bush "earned" after the 2004 elections was just Monopoly money.
Very powerful read from boortz can't say that I agree with it tho
I have no problem with his comments on CEO pay, and no problem with the minimum wage bill.
but the comments at the SOTU about global warming, that issue is just too big to give away to the Dems.
I don't really like the guy.