To: All; Antoninus; upchuck; bushfamfan; Fierce Allegiance; Hydroshock; SoCalPol; brothers4thID; ...
PING
Sorry this thing is so chopped up. DMNews has to be excerpted and it took a lot of chopping to get this one down to size.
It is a good analysis with reality medicines for all of us. Everyone should follow the link and read the whole thing. (IT'S NOT LONG)
2 posted on
02/01/2007 10:09:43 AM PST by
GulfBreeze
(I Like Duncan Hunter for the GOP Presidential Nomination in 2008)
To: All
Fit to be PRESIDENT!
68 posted on
02/01/2007 11:43:42 AM PST by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget, we are all still friends - basically :) - despite our differences)
To: GulfBreeze
126 posted on
02/01/2007 1:45:02 PM PST by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: GulfBreeze
but one thing is clear: Republicans have tended to do better with nominees like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, who drew the enthusiastic support of conservatives, than with those who attracted less fervent backing, like Gerald Ford, the elder George Bush and Bob Dole.
That is an attractive argument. I am certainly open to Hunter. Is Tancredo still running? But I would also be happy with Gingrich or Romney. Ann Coulter says that Romney has the ability to fool Democrats into voting for him. Quite an endorsement. I think he does look and sound good on T.V. She also describes Gingrich as brilliant, which might be true. I wonder how much hate the left still has for Newt. Their vitriol could backfire. For the number two position, I suggest someone further to the right - impeachment insurance. Romney-Hunter? Romney-Gingrich? Gingrich-Hunter?
148 posted on
02/01/2007 6:22:43 PM PST by
ChessExpert
(Reagan defeated the Soviet Union despite the Democratic party. We could use another miracle.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson