Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Facing Major Gender Imbalance
ABC News ^ | 1/10/2007

Posted on 01/12/2007 5:39:31 PM PST by StoneGiant

China Facing Major Gender Imbalance

New slogan for folks in Asia... "Hide the women!"

Also, please note that the largest population of communists in the world has an untenable social policy. Where's Socialism when you need it?

alt






alt





China Facing Major Gender Imbalance

Report: China Will Soon Have 30 Million More Men Than Women of Marriageable Age

The Associated Press

BEIJING - China will have 30 million more men of marriageable age than women in less than 15 years as a gender imbalance resulting in part from the country's tough one-child policy becomes more pronounced, state media reported Friday. Traditional preferences for sons has led to the widespread - but illegal - practice of women aborting babies if an early term sonogram shows it is a girl.

The tens of millions of men who will not be able to find a wife could also lead to social instability problems, the China Daily said in a front-page report.

China imposed strict population controls in the 1970s to limit growth of its huge population, but one side effect has been a jump in gender selection of babies.

"Discrimination against the female sex remains the primary cause of China's growing gender imbalance," Liu Bohong, vice director of the women studies institute under the All-China Women's Federation, was quoted as saying in a report from the State Population and Family Planning Commission.

Sex selective abortion is prohibited but the government says the practice remains widespread, especially in rural areas.

The report, carried in the newspaper, said China's sex ratio for newborn babies in 2005 was 118 boys to 100 girls, a huge jump from 110 to 100 in 2000.

In some regions such as the southern provinces of Guangdong and Hainan, the ratio has ballooned to 130 boys to 100 girls, the newspaper said. The average for industrialized countries is between 104 and 107 boys for every 100 girls.

The report predicted that by 2020 the imbalance would mean men of marriageable age especially those with low income or little education would find it difficult to find wives, resulting in possible social problems.

The problem is not just a rural issue, with the newborn gender imbalance also widening in cities. In the first 11 months of 2006, there were 109 boys born in Beijing for every 100 girls.

China Daily said one way to solve the problem would be to create a proper social security system so rural couples would not feel they needed a son to depend on when they get old.

Up to 800 million of China's 1.3 billion people live in the countryside.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; china
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Enterprise
That's going to be a lot of buzzard bait.

Well nobody said they would win. In the final one they loose.

41 posted on 01/12/2007 7:48:00 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Even buzzards like chinese food occasionally.


42 posted on 01/12/2007 7:50:35 PM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

How about an Internet site to introduce Chinese men and Muslim women? :-)

Why? You want Chinese Muslims? I think that there are enough Muslims now, more than enough.


43 posted on 01/12/2007 8:05:04 PM PST by Chickensoup (If you don't go to the holy war, the holy war will come to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Wikipedia calls the PLA at 2.25 million, the worlds largest single employer. They also state size at "3.25 million if active paramilitary personnel are counted."

Assuming its close to accurate, China is going to have to increase their military size by 9 to 14 fold to get the 30 million employed. It will be noticed by the neighbors.
44 posted on 01/12/2007 8:29:19 PM PST by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat

Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler were all noticed. Their neighbors are out numbered and their strongest ally military wise is too wishy washy when it comes to dealing with China in a firm manner.


45 posted on 01/12/2007 8:45:15 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

That makes sense.


46 posted on 01/12/2007 8:55:59 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
"30 million expendable lives for a military purpose."

American general complained to a ChiCom general about political prisoners. Chicom said "How many million would you like us to send you?"

yitbos

47 posted on 01/13/2007 12:02:35 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Or will the parents storm the capital in a human wave?
Never underestimate the rage of a parent who has lost his only child
***I suppose the best examples we have to proceed from in recent ChiCom history are
1) tens of thousands of Chinese soldiers lost in Korea;
2) millions of parents losing their children in the the 1960's "cultural revolution" and
3) the Tianenmen Square student democracy demonstrations.
In all cases, the ChiCom govmint shrugged off the criticism. In the case of a war against Taiwan with tens of millions of sons lost in the "great migration", it will probably be no different. China can afford to lose hundreds of millions of citizens.


48 posted on 01/17/2007 5:26:07 PM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson