Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Viking Longships' Last Voyage Strikes Fear Into The Heart Of Archaeologists
Scotsman ^ | Walter Gibbs

Posted on 01/01/2007 3:06:17 PM PST by blam

Viking longships' last voyage strikes fear into the heart of archaeologists

WALTER GIBBS IN OSLO

A ROW has broken out in Norway over a decision to move three ancient Viking ships, which may not survive the journey.

The University of Oslo has decided to move three longships, probably by lorry and barge, to a new museum, despite dire warnings that the thousand-year-old oak vessels could fall apart en route.

A retired curator of Oslo's current Viking Ship Museum has said that the delicately preserved ships, two of which are nearly 80ft long, were almost equal in archaeological importance to the Pyramids.

"Even if I have to live till I am 100, I will go on fighting this move," the former curator, Arne Emil Christensen, 70, said. "The best way to stop it is still through diplomacy, but, if necessary, I will be in front of the ships, chained to the floor."

The university's board of directors has to move the sleek-hulled vessels over the objections of Christensen and several other Viking Age scholars, including the former director of the British Museum, David Wilson, and the director of Denmark's Centre for Maritime Archaeology, Ole Crumlin-Pedersen.

The board wants to transport the popular ships from a remote Oslo peninsula where they have been housed for more than 75 years to a large, multifaceted museum in the centre of the capital.

The three ships were recovered in pieces from separate Viking burial mounds more than a century ago, then painstakingly reassembled with rivets, glue, creosote and linseed oil.

Since then their condition has deteriorated markedly. Christensen said they have the consistency of dry crackers are now too fragile to move.

The most spectacular of them, the Oseberg ship, was built around the year 800 and has featured on the covers of many history books.

Its towering, carved snakehead prow and 30 oars offer insight into the old English prayer, "Deliver us, O Lord, from the fury of the Norsemen." Viking raiders carried by such ships were the scourge of Britain and much of the European continent from the 8th to the 11th centuries.

Engineers from Det Norske Veritas, a risk management foundation, have modelled the Oseberg ship by computer and concluded it could be moved "with little probability of damage" if a gyroscopically controlled cradle is designed to bear all five tons of oak without the slightest stress or tilt.

The most likely travel route would be in three segments: downhill by truck for 750 yards, across the Oslo Fjord by barge for 2.5 miles, and uphill by truck again for several hundred yards.

"It will be a dramatic day, for sure, but I will stay calm," said the University of Oslo president, Geir Ellingsrud. "I am convinced that the move will take place without significant problems."

The Oseberg ship's rival for the attention of museum-goers is the more workmanlike Gokstad ship, dating to around 890. Its strakes, ribs and keel have not been analysed for strength. The third vessel, called Tune, is really only half a ship; but what remains came out of the ground in one piece, held together by the original iron rivets. The most brittle objects are a ceremonial sleigh and a wheeled wagon found in the Oseberg ship.

"We simply don't know what may happen if these things are moved," said Christensen, an archaeologist who recently retired as the ships' curator and has not yet been replaced. "In my opinion, we run the risk of serious damage to both the ships and the artefacts."

Ellingsrud, a mathematician, said Christensen and his colleagues were exaggerating the risk "out of emotion" stemming from their long association with the ships.

He acknowledged that they had one more card to play without turning to civil disobedience. Norway's Directorate of Cultural Heritage has the power to declare landmarks untouchable and is evaluating whether the current Viking Ship Museum and its contents should be protected as one monument.

"The point of no return has not been reached yet," Ellingsrud said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeologists; godsgravesglyphs; longship; norway; oslo; viking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: philetus
"The Vikings invented the lapstrake hull, which is the strongest way to make a wooden hull. It will flex in rough seas instead of break."

Yup. They split the wood down the natural grain of the wood and didn't cut across the grains the way we do today.

21 posted on 01/01/2007 3:47:43 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

I love to imagine the men on that ship. It makes one wonder which of today's objects will survive for such a discovery.

Moving it seems WAY too risky. If it were endangered where it it, it might be worth the risk; but this looks to be a struggle of "greed."


22 posted on 01/01/2007 3:54:47 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

Like the old battleship in Stockholm.


23 posted on 01/01/2007 3:57:17 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill
"I fully expected to see a Viking Kitty in a boat on this thread."

So did I

24 posted on 01/01/2007 4:00:22 PM PST by skimask (People who care what you do don't matter.......People who matter don't care what you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

That is a beautiful ship, displayed wonderfully.


25 posted on 01/01/2007 4:02:38 PM PST by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

These ships are amazing in person. Up close, the carvings on the ships are quite detailed. The insides are deep, enough to carry many people. What these must have looked like on the open sea, I can only imagine. Standing next to them I felt quite small. A must see, if you can travel to Oslo. That entire peninsula has neat museums and stops to check out, if you have the time.


26 posted on 01/01/2007 4:14:38 PM PST by RunnerMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

"The Vikings invented the lapstrake hull, which is the strongest way to make a wooden hull. It will flex in rough seas instead of break."

"Yup. They split the wood down the natural grain of the wood and didn't cut across the grains the way we do today"

One tree per strake. The center section was riven out rather than sawn. Think about doing that with 2 foot diameter oak bole. Selected curved sections of the tree for the curved sections of strake. Ton of work with hand tools.


27 posted on 01/01/2007 4:34:58 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
"One tree per strake. The center section was riven out rather than sawn. Think about doing that with 2 foot diameter oak bole. Selected curved sections of the tree for the curved sections of strake. Ton of work with hand tools."

I saw a one hour documentary where all the techniques used were demonstrated. Good show.

28 posted on 01/01/2007 5:26:28 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blam

btt


29 posted on 01/01/2007 5:39:11 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I saw a one hour documentary where all the techniques used were demonstrated. Good show

I would have liked to have seen it. I did see one on shipbuilding techniques during Roman times in the Mediterranean. Initially all the wood was cut and shaped to the curve of the ship. Labor intensive. Later they went to lapstrake which used less time. Unlike the roman ships, the straked hulls for viking ships were formed around the keel first, and the ribs and cross members were added afterward. (But this probably would have been covered on the show.)


30 posted on 01/01/2007 6:40:45 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RunnerMom

Absolutely agree! We spent a couple of days exploring all the museums on Bigdoy. I thought the ships were the most spectacular, followed closely by the small stavkirke at the Folksmuset.


31 posted on 01/01/2007 8:35:28 PM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Like the old battleship in Stockholm.

Meaning...the Vasa?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regalskeppet_Vasa

32 posted on 01/02/2007 4:18:32 AM PST by Eclectica (Ask your MD about Evolution. Please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam
Oh, for pete sake. All they need is a really big box and a bazillion Styrofoam peanuts. The damn things aren't glass and they won't turn to powder.

The things people fret over . . .
33 posted on 01/02/2007 4:57:11 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eclectica

Yes. It was still being bathed in a preservative mist when I visited it thirty years ago.


34 posted on 01/02/2007 4:57:14 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: blam

The ship is absolutely beautiful. Unbelievable that anyone would attempt to move it and in the process possibly destroy it.


35 posted on 01/02/2007 6:20:11 AM PST by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam

Did they find any spam in the galley?


36 posted on 01/02/2007 6:35:51 AM PST by rabidralph (Happy New Year, y'all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I have to agree; why can't they just put a replica in the downtown museum? Let's face it, most tourists won't know the difference or care. And those few who really want to see the original will probably make the trip out to the "remote" peninsula (which sounds like it is only 3 miles away, fer pete's sake!).

Gorgeous ships though. What beautiful, elegant lines.


37 posted on 01/02/2007 11:52:29 AM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (Kelo must GO!! ..... http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
it was put to use as a burial ship for a prominent woman who died in 834.... Under the ship was a thick layer of blue clay, while the mound itself was built up of turf.

Wait a minute! You mean they actually used the ship as a coffin and buried it?

I thought they put the person in the ship and burned it while on the water! Always thought THAT was a viking funeral.

I saw it in a movie, so it MUST be twue. ;)

38 posted on 01/03/2007 5:44:09 PM PST by Chani (Happy cows make good cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

I'm just imagining that you credit the Romans with the invention of the "frame first, hull next" construction schedule first developed in the Middle Ages.


39 posted on 03/26/2007 12:20:58 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chani

It was FOR a woman's burial.


40 posted on 03/26/2007 12:22:06 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson