Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/05/2006 1:32:55 PM PST by Caleb1411
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rhema; MHGinTN; cpforlife.org; Salvation
George Orwell said of the language of "orthodoxy" that it "seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style." That was what I heard nearly all the two hours of "orthodox" oral argument at the Supreme Court on whether banning D&X would be unconstitutional.

Whatever the decision, doctors will still be able to dismember the baby. Yes, the baby.

2 posted on 12/05/2006 1:35:07 PM PST by Caleb1411 ("These are the days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed except his own." G. K. C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411
"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!"
--Samuel Adams (1722-1803), letter to John Pitts, January 21, 1776
3 posted on 12/05/2006 1:35:54 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

Justice John Paul Stevens quickly interrupted: "Whether the FETUS is more than halfway out," he corrected the solicitor general.
"Some of the fetuses, I understand in the procedure," Justice Stevens added, "are only 4 or 5 inches long. They're very different from fully formed babies."

It would have been funny, if right there, the Solicitor General had said, "With all due respect, your honor, with that statement alone, it's quite clear where you stand on the issue."


4 posted on 12/05/2006 1:39:00 PM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411
In his essay "Politics and the English Language," Orwell said, "What is above all needed (in honest speaking) is to let the meaning choose the word, and not the other way about."

I find my conservatism is rooted in this concept, more than anything else. I am a conservative about the meaning of words. Time and time again, liberals on other forums have decried me as some kind of Neanderthal for taking such a view. I'm just not sophisticated enough, you see, to understand all the nuances of meaning.

Horsecrap. I've been around long enough to have witnessed the destruction of clear meaning by individuals, corporations and government time and time again, in their efforts to circumvent the consequences of the dictionary meaning of words. If words can be slotted to whatever meaning is useful, then laws, contracts and the Constitution have no meaning other than what a robed priesthood deems them to have. Which is why the battles over the Supreme Court have become so vicious - because, with the acceptance of the infinite elasticity of meaning, SCOTUS becomes the final arbiter of all things in our society.

5 posted on 12/05/2006 1:40:56 PM PST by dirtboy (Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411
"Some of the fetuses, I understand in the procedure," Justice Stevens added, "are only 4 or 5 inches long. They're very different from fully formed babies." Odd how a dead soul needs to keep silencing his conscience in order to remain annoyingly dead. This subpreme court judge is the consummate dead soul liberal, ever attending to the language he will allow others to use so as to control the discussion, limiting it to only those positions he has in god-like power settled for the rest of us. Stevens is a disgusting elitist thing ... almost as mutagenistic to the Constitution as Breyer and Ginsberg.
29 posted on 12/05/2006 3:16:37 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411
"Some of the fetuses, I understand in the procedure," Justice Stevens[a fully developed old human] added, "are only 4 or 5 inches long. They're very different from fully formed babies."

Bravo Justice Stevens! And I might add that you are 'very different' than a 14-year old male human! You speak about the unborn just like a person who has already been born!

Perhaps we should debate the 'fully formed' definition and allow that to set the parameters of allowable abortion; or in your case, an argument for 'retro-active abortion' for the 'overly' formed person, or a person who is no longer useful to society beyond eating and sleeping and listening to the sound of their own voice?

Justice Stevens could find himself as the perfect 'poster child' for euthanasia of the 'overly formed' old baby(s)...let's see, why don't you, Stevens, be the first in line. Go ahead! Step up old man!

Justice Stevens, you are worth much, much less to our human society and the future of mankind than any 7 or 8 month old on it's way into the world! What a worthless egotistical piece of old crap!

33 posted on 12/05/2006 3:43:07 PM PST by Van Jenerette (U.S.Army 1967-1991 Infantry OCS, Hall of Fame, Ft. Benning Ga.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

Funny. Black's Law Dictionary says that "child" means, progeny, offspring. Unborn or recently born human being. What a pathetic old bastard Stevens is. He corrupts the language and the law.


40 posted on 12/05/2006 4:58:37 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

I watched it as well Nat and my reaction was the same as yours. Sad and amusing at the same time. A through the looking glass SCOTUS moment.


49 posted on 12/05/2006 5:50:36 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

Not to change the subject, and apologies in advance, but when did they start allowing cameras into USSC arguments? Is this something CJ Roberts allowed? I can't believe I missed this - I've been hoping they'd do this for years.

Back to the topic, kind of: I hadn't realized Hentoff was a pro-lifer. Good news - I've always thought he was a great thinker, though I disagree with him on some things. I'd assumed abortion was one of those things.


52 posted on 12/05/2006 6:00:27 PM PST by ravensandricks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

Don't hide behind the term, "pro-life". I'm proud to call myself "anti-abortion". I don't let my opponents hide behind the term, "pro-choice". They are pro-abortion, pure and simple. Even if they spout the crap about, "Well, I wouldn't have an abortion, but I won't tell someone else what to do." I counter with, "Did your great-great-grandfather have a bumper sticker on his buckboard that said, "Don't like slavery? Then don't own one!"


58 posted on 12/06/2006 1:01:48 AM PST by hunter112 (Total victory at home and in the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

Nat Hentoff : pretty smart for an old liberal.


59 posted on 12/06/2006 1:09:28 AM PST by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO " We are going to take things away from you for the Common Good ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411

Nat Hentoff is an important ally to the pro-life movement. Whereas many liberals like to scoff at pro-lifers, calling us religious zealots, Hentoff is an admitted atheist, so his objections can't be dismissed so easily. His is truly a voice in the liberal wilderness!


62 posted on 12/06/2006 6:42:59 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411
I might loved to be in on that dialoge and asked the "good" lawyer in a black robe, "Well, Justice Stevens, if one can grab hold of both the legs, pull it out until just before the head is exposed, I'd say that that 'fetus' mightly resembled a newborn BABY, your honor."
64 posted on 12/06/2006 8:40:56 AM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower (Kansan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411
Remember, that guy at the gas station isn't a pump jockey. He's a Petroleum Transport Engineer.
Which is to say, English is a wonderful language to hide things that would otherwise demean or inconvience you.
65 posted on 12/06/2006 8:45:13 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Joseph Sobran, another great columnist, wrote an article with the same title years ago. http://www.sobran.com/columns/1999-2001/000824.shtml

These two men are great. They also both referenced George Orwell, who... "analyzed the corrupting influence of dishonest politics on the way we speak and think."

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

71 posted on 12/07/2006 5:55:17 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411; MHGinTN; huldah1776; Raymann; cpforlife.org; Coleus
"Intact dilation and extraction," causing "fetal demise."

The "final solution" in "family planning."

74 posted on 12/08/2006 1:04:21 AM PST by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; AliVeritas; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; Augie76; ...

ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

75 posted on 12/08/2006 7:37:32 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Let fly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Caleb1411; 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; AliVeritas; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; ...
Here's an excerpt from a column about Altio, which includes comment on a similar situation the last time they considered a major abortion case:

In the case of abortion, the Court could very easily decide that states have some of the same power to regulate it that they have over other medical procedures. It would be possible for a state to require parental notification and informed consent. Bans could be passed on partial-birth abortion and on taking other people’s daughters across state lines to obtain abortions. The states could even require the same safety protocols that other surgical clinics must follow. But the scariest part for the abortion industry isn’t necessarily the extra regulations, but the fact that the judicial firewall would come down, and they would have to argue their case in the public square instead of depending on the “super-duper precedent” of Roe. There is nothing they fear more than having to explain themselves, and the Court could preserve Roe and still require them to do so.

That may explain why oral arguments went the way they did in the recent case regarding parental notification in New Hampshire. It was Justice O’Connor’s last abortion case, and Chief Justice Roberts’ first. One striking feature was a long discussion of the exact mechanics of contacting a judge if a pregnant teen needed an emergency abortion and her parents were unavailable or she did not want them notified. How long might it take, the justices and lawyers wondered, to get that vital permission and save her life, health or fertility? Of course, no one would ask that question about an appendectomy; the doctor would simply do the procedure. That would be the reasonable answer in the case of a true emergency abortion as well, but the Justices weren’t discussing reason. They were discussing possible outs that would allow them to preserve the Roe firewall.

For four decades, American liberalism has depended largely on federal courts coming down from the mountain with stone tablets to impose their vision. Now that era may be ending, not with stone tablets imposed from the Right, but with the people making the decisions and writing the tablets.

No wonder they feel like their world’s coming to an end.


78 posted on 12/08/2006 8:09:28 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Let fly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson