[MHGinTN]

"Some of the fetuses, I understand in the procedure," Justice Stevens added, "are only 4 or 5 inches long. They're very different from fully formed babies." Odd how a dead soul needs to keep silencing his conscience in order to remain annoyingly dead. This subpreme court judge is the consummate dead soul liberal, ever attending to the language he will allow others to use so as to control the discussion, limiting it to only those positions he has in god-like power settled for the rest of us. Stevens is a disgusting elitist thing ... almost as mutagenistic to the Constitution as Breyer and Ginsberg.

[Lexinom]

Yeah, well, the burden of proof is for Justice Stephens and those of his ilk to demonstrate tangibly some fundamental, ontological difference between a baby, ahem, fetus "4 or 5 inches long" and a "fully formed baby."

At what moment, exactly, does the state of the entity in question morph from non-human, non-person, non-child, to human, person, child? Until they can demonstrate that, our laws are not reflecting the natural and rational default position - that the entity is as much a person-substance at one cell as it is at one trillion cells.

Does that make sense? Anyone?