Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Plans Massive Outreach
NewsMax.com ^ | November 21, 2006 | NewsMax Staff

Posted on 11/23/2006 6:36:57 PM PST by no dems

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is telling associates that he’s launching a major new grass-roots movement to recapture the soul of the Republican Party, and quite possibly the White House.

Gingrich says that the effort will be much larger than his founding of GOPAC and his creation of the Contract with America.

The Georgia Republican is spearheading a program called "American Solutions for Winning the Future” in an effort to revitalize the GOP with Ronald Reagan conservatism.

This is the third time Gingrich has led a drive to steer the Republican Party toward traditional conservative values. In 1986, Gingrich took the chair of the Republican political action committee GOPAC and transformed it into an effective tool for electing conservative candidates. The stated theme of GOPAC was "a conservative opportunity society replacing the liberal welfare state.”

GOPAC was a key element in Gingrich’s rise to the leadership of the Republican caucus in Congress.

Then in 1994, as House Minority Leader, Gingrich was a co-author of the Contract with America, a conservative political platform that helped the GOP gain 54 seats in the House and end 40 years of Democratic majorities there.

Gingrich’s new program echoes the title of his 2005 book, "Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract with America.”

Sources close to the former speaker say Gingrich believes the Republican Party has once again lost its way, and needs to refocus its agenda with an eye toward regaining Congress in 2008.

Stepping back into the political spotlight could help Gingrich’s presidential aspirations as well.

He recently told an interviewer that he won’t decide whether to seek the White House in 2008 until September of 2007.

But insiders predict Gingrich could throw his hat into the ring if a true Reagan conservative doesn’t emerge as a likely GOP candidate.

For the time being, he’s playing his cards close to the vest. "I am not ‘running’ for president, I am seeking to create a movement to win the future by offering a series of solutions so compelling that if the American people say I have to be president, it will happen,” he tells Fortune magazine.

Gingrich said he plans to build grass-roots support for the health care, national security, and energy independence ideas he has been promoting for the past six years.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: affair; damagedgoods; gingrich; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-331 next last
To: I_Love_My_Husband

All he had to do was hold the line on spending when he was in charge, and he'd have my respect and support.


141 posted on 11/23/2006 9:04:23 PM PST by ROTB (Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Q. Adams, October 11, 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Unless of course he sells out to hide an affair with a lady church choir singer, as he did with the impeachment proceedings.
142 posted on 11/23/2006 9:05:17 PM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
The area of Baghdad in Iraq is the messy area alone
in that country. Militant Islam is the problem
world wide and that will begin to become more and
more apparent within' the next few years. The Dems
will not have the wherewithal to deal with this.

The congressional misdoings will be forgotten much
sooner than you believe. Demo deconstruction will
begin soon. Like the elephant, REPs have longer and
better memories than the Jackasses....JJ61
143 posted on 11/23/2006 9:07:25 PM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

Could he be elected without the Evangelical Christian vote?


144 posted on 11/23/2006 9:11:19 PM PST by ROTB (Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Q. Adams, October 11, 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
"How much of the "Contract with America" did Newt get put into legislation?"

....VERY LITTLE!? !

The most charitable reply to that statement is 'you have a very poor memory'.

The correct answer is virtually ALL of it.

Witness:
"The ten items in the Contract were all acted upon in the first 100 days of the new Congress, which is what the signatories had pledged. Nine of the ten items in the Contract passed the House: Only the constitutional amendment on term limits (which required a two-thirds vote) was defeated. Out of a total of 302 roll call votes on issues related to the Contract With America, the conservatives prevailed on 299 of them. A balanced budget amendment passed in the House by a 300-123 margin but was subsequently defeated as it fell one vote short of the two-thirds needed for passage in the U.S. Senate. The overall margin by which the items in the Contract were passed averaged about 70 percent despite the fact that the Republicans only held a 12-seat margin over the Democrats (52-48 percent, the smallest House majority margin in 40 years). Given the notorious lack of party discipline in the American Congress, the passage by a large majority of nearly all of the items in the Contract was a remarkable achievement."

This stuff is quickly and easily found .... on the internet.

Yours for accurate recollection,
skeptoid

145 posted on 11/23/2006 9:12:48 PM PST by skeptoid (BS, AE, AA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

I'm not trashing him at all. I like Newt, but I think on a massive scale, he would lose.

The same idiot swing voters that helped the Dems take Congress would vote for Hillary over Newt.


146 posted on 11/23/2006 9:14:02 PM PST by RockinRight (There's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow stripes and dead armadillos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: no dems

We do need NEWT if he ran for president I'd support him in a NY minute.


147 posted on 11/23/2006 9:16:47 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

Perhaps enough time has passed from the media's "Newt is Evil" phase for people to give him a listen. I just remember back in '97 or so some very conservative people spouting "Newt's a crook" and all that jazz.


148 posted on 11/23/2006 9:19:06 PM PST by RockinRight (There's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow stripes and dead armadillos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

He married that younger woman.


149 posted on 11/23/2006 9:20:29 PM PST by skeptoid (BS, AE, AA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Well, I remember the media working 24/7 to bring Newt down. That should show anyone good he was. Remember, the Democrats in congress tossed out ethics violations everyday. They eventually had their day.


150 posted on 11/23/2006 9:25:12 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
I do not see mayhem here. I do see a few people expressing their heart felt opinions and I see agreement and disagreement about those opinions and I see individuals trying to work out a course, a direction that will bring about a conservative victory in 08.

I also see heated discussions and some disparaging accusations. I would guess these exchanges are to be expected now and again, especially when talking politics or religion.

I like Newt. I don't like any of the other likely candidates or their chances of uniting conservatives.

The problem with Newt, as a candidate, is that he would win any debate with what ever DEM is his opponent but half of the citizens would not understand he won. They would wait for the talking heads to tell them, "well you know Newt made a few good points but the other guy/gal looked better"
151 posted on 11/23/2006 9:27:00 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: no dems

My family loves Newt (just not his name).


152 posted on 11/23/2006 9:27:39 PM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

My family loves Newt (just not his name).


153 posted on 11/23/2006 9:27:39 PM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid
A balanced budget amendment passed in the House by a 300-123 margin but was subsequently defeated as it fell one vote short of the two-thirds needed for passage in the U.S. Senate.

Isn't is always amazing that large issues geared in peoples favor fail by one vote? The term limits could have passed because this same group - the Supremes - would have overturned it. Remember in government, once you figure out the rules & start to put these in place for our benefit, the pols change the rules. Remember one other statement by me when GW was 1st elected I stated & guaranteed no true conservative Supreme Court when he left.

154 posted on 11/23/2006 9:28:12 PM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Sorry he is no Ronnie. He has too many problems with his zipper.

All right, he who has not sinned may cast the first stone!

He has paid dearly for his mistake. Why do you want to keep punishing him? Are you perfect?

155 posted on 11/23/2006 9:38:59 PM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid
Excellent work Skeptoid....JJ61
156 posted on 11/23/2006 9:48:28 PM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: photodawg

"Newt needs to do a modified Checkers speech prior to declaring his candidacy and see how it is received. He has to purge his soul and get right with the lord to get past his past."

And I suppose you will be the one judging whether he is "right with the Lord" Such hubris!


157 posted on 11/23/2006 9:50:35 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn; TheLion

I'm just listening to the radio and they're (virginradio.co.uk) playing "I Love Rock N Roll" by Joan Jett, and it made me think of Newt, and how he really rocks, and could take on any and all challengers.

I was a Dem and had voted for Clinton way back then, and yet, I'd see Newt & Clinton on television, and I'd listen to what Newt had to say, with an open mind, though I was, at that time extremely leftwing. And what Newt was saying was making sense to me, in fact, it seemed (to me) that Clinton was capitulating to Newt, because Newt was just plain smarter.

I think it was Newt, Michael Savage, and the real world of working for the San Francisco Unified School District that all came together and changed me, forever.


158 posted on 11/23/2006 9:51:01 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband (http://community.livejournal.com/_2008_repubpres/profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Digger
>>>>>Newt & Tancredo are about the best I can come up with ....

Its still early to be choosing sides, but I like that ticket. Hypothetically speaking, of course.

Both Gingrich and Tancredo are fine examples of Reagan conservatives.

159 posted on 11/23/2006 9:57:35 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband

I'm glad you changed.

I think I became a true conservative by listening to talk radio back in the 80's. I used to drive on sales calls all the time and would really get into those shows.

Newt has the ability to communicate with the common man. He doest't come off as a political panderer, as so many do.


160 posted on 11/23/2006 9:59:41 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-331 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson