Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope-commissioned condom study passes first hurdle
Reuters ^ | November 21, 2006 | Philip Pullella

Posted on 11/22/2006 6:17:36 AM PST by NYer

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - A study commissioned by Pope Benedict on the use of condoms to fight AIDS has passed its first hurdle and is now being reviewed by top theologians for possible use in a Papal document, a cardinal said on Tuesday.

"This is something that worries the Pope a lot," said Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, head of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care.

The Catholic Church opposes the use of condoms and teaches that fidelity within heterosexual marriage, chastity and abstinence are the best ways to stop the spread of AIDS.

It says promoting condoms fosters immoral and hedonistic lifestyles and behavior that will only contribute to its spread. It teaches that homosexual acts are sinful in the first place.

"Following the wishes of Benedict, we carried out a careful study on condoms, both from a scientific and moral point of view," Barragan told a news conference.

Barragan spoke on the day a United Nations report said HIV infections were on the rise in all regions and that nearly 40 million adults and children are infected worldwide.

His department had completed a 200-page study on condoms and passed it on to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which would add its own theological and doctrinal opinions.

The study, which would not be made public, would then be passed on to the Pope, who may use it for his own pronouncement.

"First, we must consider if there is a need for an answer (on the use of condoms) at the supreme level," he said.

He said his department's study was based on scientific data and "took all points of view" into consideration.

"We hope the theologians and the Holy Father will say what is best regarding this subject ... but no response from the Church can be one that encourages a libertine sexual attitude," he said.

Barragan, who spoke at the presentation of a Vatican conference on the pastoral aspects on the treatment of infectious diseases, declined to give any details on the study.

In recent years, several top Church officials have called for a change in Vatican policy on condoms to allow their use by married couples where one partner is affected by HIV or AIDS.

But the Vatican has been loath to issue any document that could be interpreted as a green light for the use of condoms to stop the spread of AIDS, fearing it would endorse promiscuity.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: aids; catholic; condoms; vatican

1 posted on 11/22/2006 6:17:38 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 11/22/2006 6:18:07 AM PST by NYer (Apart from the cross, there is no other ladder by which we may get to Heaven. St. Rose of Lima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Sins of Commission, Sins of Emission.

just a joke

3 posted on 11/22/2006 6:21:36 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
In recent years, several top Church officials have called for a change in Vatican policy on condoms to allow their use by married couples where one partner is affected by HIV or AIDS.

It ain't gonna happen, lefties.

4 posted on 11/22/2006 6:26:55 AM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I thought that condoms were too porous to prevent virii from passing through them.


5 posted on 11/22/2006 6:35:14 AM PST by Disambiguator (This tagline is brought to you by the letter "S" with a slash in front of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

"Virii" isn't a word. If you mean "viruses," no.


6 posted on 11/22/2006 6:42:00 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

Shhhhhhhhhhh!

Thats a secret.

Liberal dogma is that condoms make you safe and that any science-based argument to the contrary is dogmatic foolishness.


7 posted on 11/22/2006 6:42:38 AM PST by Notwithstanding (Post-9/11 Volunteer Active Duty OEF Vet Lawyer (who is too dumb to understand Kerry's apology))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze

Viriiuses.

:^)


8 posted on 11/22/2006 6:54:02 AM PST by Disambiguator (This tagline is brought to you by the letter "S" with a slash in front of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

Yep, they are.

About 10 years ago, the U.S. Naval Laboratory did tests on condoms and latex gloves--even in products that passed FDA guidelines.

The holes found in the condoms ranged from 5-70 microns in diameter--in comparison, the HIV virus is a tenth of a micron in diameter.

In short, while condoms can reduce the spread of diseases caused by larger particles (e.g. syphilis), viruses pass through them so easily--imagine shooting a .22 or a BB through a cargo net...


9 posted on 11/22/2006 8:54:03 AM PST by rzeznikj at stout (Boldly Going Nowhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
There's also the slip, rip & drip factor. And certain --- uh, practices which work againt the normal direction of ---certain muscles, which result in a higher degree of--uh, wear and tear.

Watching my language, here.

10 posted on 11/22/2006 11:04:15 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (It's a condomaton of factors, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Raincoats for the bishops....


11 posted on 11/22/2006 11:06:02 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Let's just say that they don't always work as advertised and leave it at that.

:^)


12 posted on 11/22/2006 11:12:28 AM PST by Disambiguator (This tagline is brought to you by the letter "S" with a slash in front of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I join with Miss Manners in applauding your delicacy in language.


13 posted on 11/22/2006 3:02:04 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If I was HIV positive, and I really loved my wife, I wouldn't want to take ANY chances on infecting her. Condoms are not 100% effective. The only acceptable alternative is to live as brother and sister. It would be tough, but I would rather have her alive and well. Life has it's crosses, and the Lord will always help us with our crosses.


14 posted on 11/23/2006 7:12:08 AM PST by goodform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson