Posted on 11/15/2006 10:36:23 AM PST by Dane
2000
Arizona-6
Hayworth 171,446 61%
Nelson 101,697 37%
2002
Arizona-5
Republican Hayworth 86,191 61%
Democratic Columbus 52,192 37%
Libertarian Severin 3,703 2%
2004
Arizona-5
Republican Hayworth 159,455 60%
Democratic Rogers 102,363 38%
Libertarian Kielsky 6,189 2%
2006
Arizona-5
Democratic Mitchell 73,762 51%
Republican Hayworth 67,830 46%
Libertarian Severin 4,754 3%
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Altering titles to push your agenda is a blatent violation of FR guidelines.
If you want any kind of "guest worker" program, it'll have to be Kyl/Cornyn in order to get it to pass. Arizonan's have NO problem with LEGAL immigration, as a matter of fact they are welcomed here. It's the illegals that are swamping the system. We also don't like law breakers because they have no problem with breaking OTHER laws, like having insurance when they drive cars, or paying for their doctor bills, or not taking what they want from those who worked hard for it.
That's right. Above reproach.
Wow, that's facinating.
A Mexican who's crime is wanting a job is the moral equivilant of killing a defenseless child.
Excuse me while I puke.
If you believe this, you are a disgrace to the pro-life movement.
Sheesh someone hit the bong early today?
What was the immigration position of his opponent in 2006?
Was he pro or anti illegal immigration?
Was he for or against amnesty?
Try a remedial reading course at your local JC.
Hayworth was Tancredo hardline. He even voted against HR 4437 because he said it wasn't tough enough.
See how easy playing that game is?
Yah? A whole lot more then that are killed by American citizens.
Your point is?
You screwed up the period after the "D" too. Speaking of screwed up D's, sorry the Steelers will be sitting at home watching the Jets in the playoffs this year.
You missed it, alright.
Its easy to lay the blame for last week's loss at the feet of someone who's issue you don't feel is important as your's, but the argument you make against them might be applied to your own favorite issue.
This is why political parties have won in the past on PLATFORMS. Its a package deal. Throw out one issue and you can throw them all out.
Show me a political party who's members agree on every issue, and I'll show you a political party who has one member and zero power.
Theres that reading comprehension problem again. Where did I say we need to agree? I'd settle for refraining from actively undermining the other republican's issue. How about that?
Yes, I said that. Did you forget to post a comment?
AZ-8 voted as presently constituted voted 53-47 Bush in 2004, and 49-47 (4 for Nader) Bush in 2000. It is a marginal district, not a liberal one.
It's a liberal district that occasionally breaks moderate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.