Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet the new "real" RNC leader - Mike Duncan
Republican National Committee ^ | November 14, 2006 | RNC

Posted on 11/14/2006 7:54:28 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers

Robert M. (Mike) Duncan was confirmed as General Counsel of the Republican National Committee in July 2002 and January 2005. He previously was elected Treasurer of the RNC in January 2001. Duncan, in his fourth term as National Committeeman from Kentucky, has served the party at every level from precinct captain, county chairman, state chairman, and national officer. He has been a delegate to the 1972, 1976, 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004 Republican National Conventions and is one of the few persons ever to serve on the four standing convention committees. Duncan was elected chairman of the Convention Credentials Committee in 2000 after chairing the RNC Committee on Contests for the Convention. He served as General Counsel to the 2004 Convention.

Mike Duncan has worked for Republican candidates for local, state and national office for over thirty years. In 1998 he took a leave of absence from his business and chaired Jim Bunning’s winning U.S. Senate race. Duncan is a long-time supporter and fundraiser for Senator Mitch McConnell and has worked in various campaign positions for Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush. In 2000 he chaired the Southern Republican Leadership Conference. Duncan was the Central States Chairman for the 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign, working in Kentucky, West Virginia, Indiana, Ohio and Michigan. Duncan chaired the transition team for Governor-Elect Ernie Fletcher, the first Republican elected Governor in Kentucky in 36 years.

A civic capitalist, Mike Duncan is active in numerous professional and nonprofit organizations. He served as chairman of a state university and a private college. President Bush appointed him to the President’s Commission on White House Fellows in 2001 and nominated him to the Corporation for National and Community Service in 2005. Recently the U.S. Secretary of Commerce appointed Duncan to the Advisory Committee of the Strengthening America’s Communities Initiative. Duncan is a Trustee of the Christian Appalachian Project, the fifteenth largest private social services agency in America. Professionally, Duncan was President of the Kentucky Bankers Association and a Director of the Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank Cincinnati Branch. In 1989-90, during a sabbatical, he worked in the Bush White House as assistant Director of Public Liaison. His public service has been recognized with several distinctions including honorary degrees from Cumberland College and the College of the Ozarks.

Mike Duncan and his wife Joanne are 1974 graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Law. They live in Inez, Kentucky and have one child, Rob, an Assistant United States Attorney in Lexington, Kentucky. The Duncan’s are the principal owners of two community banks with five offices in eastern Kentucky. Their student-mentoring program, in its twenty-eighth year, was featured on CBS Sunday Morning and in the Los Angeles Times.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: duncan; elections; martinez; mikeduncan; republican; republicanparty; rnc; robertduncan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: buck61

Be careful what you wish for. You may very well 'get' death then. Those of you that join the 'stay at home and don't vote group', rather than vote for a non-conservative Republican, could very well be handing a death sentence to at least part of America and even to yourself (if you're lucky enough to be in the area that gets nuked by terrorists). By handing the reins of control over to the socialist left, you'll be contributing to the cause of those deaths.

At least if you vote against the leftists, you've done something to thwart them in their attempts to hamper our efforts to protect America and Americans, even if it doesn't work and we still lose the election.

Otherwise, when the country finally does go down the toilet, you'll be one of those that can 'take credit' for the flushing.

I wouldn't want to be in your shoes when that day comes. And make no mistake. It's coming. It's just a question of time now, thanks to the idiots that would rather have socialists running the country than RINOs.

___
I agree. When you receive mail advising you to hold your nose and vote, I recommend you return it to sender.

I am hoping we will find a true conservative for 08 and if not, I will have to join the stay at home group.

The McBrains and, the Giulianist are the reason the GOP is divided today, they will only make the situation worse.

Give me conservatism or give me death!!!!!!!!!


41 posted on 11/14/2006 9:50:05 AM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

No. Mel Martinez is still a dreadful choice to be the face of the Republican party.


42 posted on 11/14/2006 10:11:36 AM PST by ilovew (Rummy...the best Secretary of Defense ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ilovew

Call the White House Comment line 1-202-456-1111 and the RNC 202-863-8500.
I told the WH line to stand up, be strong and Lead! We want to win and to tell Bush to tell the Baker Commission to stick it in their ear. I said Martinez should stay home and legislate for Florida, bad choice.
We need a human dynamo, not a wimp.
I told the RNC to make the President aware of all the empty envelopes returned with notes telling them that we are sick of the RINO's!! Bush needs to know!
Call. it can't hurt!


43 posted on 11/14/2006 10:36:10 AM PST by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

And after that, part the seas or walk on water...

win in the cobalt blue NE?


44 posted on 11/14/2006 10:39:30 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Let Hillary run!

She polarizes people.

The candidates filling out the paperwork, social liberals are NO better than she is. They're a bunch of worthless RHINO'S. They could easily be labeled Demoncrats. The difference is too small to debate. One major difference is that Demoncrats will totally destroy our country quicker - they travel at 80MPH whereas the RHINOS stay within the speed limit but the end result is the same.
45 posted on 11/14/2006 10:49:26 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
We do!

We really have to send a message to the GOP before it's too late. I wonder if it isn't too late already.
46 posted on 11/14/2006 10:50:24 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Really, I don't see even one of those 12 popular Democrats who can be unseated. People like those Democrat incumbents in the Senate from those particular states, each for their own reasons.


47 posted on 11/14/2006 10:53:35 AM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
But what if the "choice" is An anti-gun, pro-abortion RINO.....versus.... HILLARY? What then? You know that any real third party effort will still hand the Oval Office to the RATs. But you just know inside your heart that the RINO, whomever it turns out to be is going to absolutely destroy our civil liberties and take the guns and vote us into a NWO agreement with the UN. What do you do? Throw away your vote? NOT VOTE (that's a vote, too... BTW)? What? I don't know, speaking for myself.

You let the other Republican candidates know that because of their party's action, NONE of them will be receiving your support- electoral, financial or volunteer- during this election cycle. And that in future elections, you'll consider untarnished newcomers to be more deserving of your support than those who've sold us out.

When the choice is between two non-choices, pull neither lever. If the entire ballot slate is packed with non-choices, just remember that there's nothing that requires you to choose a liar, cheat or fraudster from either party.

48 posted on 11/14/2006 11:45:47 AM PST by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
And after that, part the seas or walk on water...

win in the cobalt blue NE?


49 posted on 11/14/2006 11:47:49 AM PST by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ilovew

Martinez isn't the face of the Republican Party.

George W. Bush is.


50 posted on 11/14/2006 11:53:38 AM PST by Terpfen ("Conservatives" who sat at home cost us the War on Terror, SCOTUS, and economic success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
We know why Senor Martinez was plopped into this figurehead assignment, don't we?

Because Bush believes Martinez is a good selector of races that deserve RNC funding, perhaps?
51 posted on 11/14/2006 11:54:57 AM PST by Terpfen ("Conservatives" who sat at home cost us the War on Terror, SCOTUS, and economic success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nmh

In 2008 that attitude will elect Hillary.


52 posted on 11/14/2006 11:55:13 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

This is a great post and informative. I thank you for posting it. It adds to the level of knowledge.

Mr. Duncan sounds like a fine individual and what he did in Kentucky is impressive. Most of what you say about him in Kentucky is great. Can you tell me what he has done in Washington? Does he bear any responsibility for what happened in the election last week? I ask because I don't know.

I still wish there were someone at the RNC who can be an effective spokesperson.


53 posted on 11/14/2006 11:57:14 AM PST by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

There will be many challenges in court in 2008. Martinez has 25 years experience litigating. With Martinez and Duncan, the Republican have a strong legal team at the top.


54 posted on 11/14/2006 12:17:34 PM PST by Free as the breeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
"But what if the "choice" is An anti-gun, pro-abortion RINO.....versus.... HILLARY? What then?"

Your "what if" perfectly illustrates the downside of the hold-my-breath-til-I-turn-blue conservatives who don't get what they want on the general election ballot. Last Tuesday shows the net effect of their policy.

Here's an easy solution:

Vote for the very best candidate in the primaries. Contribute, volunteer, work your butt off to get them nominated. Do everything you can.

Then vote against the worst candidate in the general election. Often it's much easier than voting for the least-bad of an unfortunate selection. But if it keeps der Hildebeast out of the White House, it's wise.
55 posted on 11/14/2006 12:24:34 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
I agree 100% with everything you said Ex-S. I do not favor McCain or Guliani, never have. The thought of Hillary as CinC gives me nightmares.

We have to work from now till election day to get a viable candidate. I worry for the future of the great country.

56 posted on 11/14/2006 1:39:32 PM PST by Oorang (Tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oorang; ExSoldier
Correction:

I worry for the future of the great country.

I worry for the future of this great country.

57 posted on 11/14/2006 1:41:52 PM PST by Oorang (Tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Spiff; Dems_R_Losers
>> Fourth, he supports affirmative action. I don't think he is excatly a hardliner on immigration either <<

>> Michael Steele is for affirmative action; I'm not sure that's the face we want on our party. <<

>> Steele is for affirmative action; I'm not sure that's the face we want on our party Ding! <<

LMAO. The rank hypocrisy here is startling. So let me get this straight. You guys OPPOSE Steele because of his position on affirmation action -- but you have no problem with Bush appointing Martinez BECAUSE of his skin color. Anyone who supports a political cipher like Martinez IS for affirmation action.

If you want to argue Martinez is in fact deserving of this promotion, please feel free to tell us about all his great fundraising and organization skills that set him far ahead of the pack. Let us know all about his shining moments as HUD Secretary and his first two years in the Senate that have capitivated America.

Melquíades Rafael Martínez would not have this job if his name was Melvin Ralph Martin and you know it, that's why you're happy the GOP wants to reduce him to a figurehead chairman. Sorry, I don't like this guy getting a bonus salary for ceremonial work.

Maryland is the bluest of the blue states and Steele ran a competative campaign there. Your hero Amnesty Mel eeked by with 49-48% in a RED state while Bush won 55% in the same campaign. Try putting your putting your buddy Mel in Maryland and let's see how hot his campaigning skills are. He'd be lucky to get over 35% in a statewide campaign.

So let me summartize your arguments. The GOP should practice affirmation action and select the only "hispanic" in high office for this promotion, but they should oppose Steele because he supports affirmation action. The official position of the GOP is "Affirmative Action is bad, unless it helps Mel's career". Brillant.

58 posted on 11/14/2006 1:42:10 PM PST by BillyBoy (ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Is Mike Duncan for the President's and the U.S. Senate's amnesty for illegal immigrants legislation? If yes, then I'm fully against him!


59 posted on 11/14/2006 1:47:06 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
but you have no problem with Bush appointing Martinez BECAUSE of his skin color.

Why don't you find one post where I said anything close to that, you damn liar.

I'll wait while you find it.

60 posted on 11/14/2006 1:48:06 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson