Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Ted Haggard delivered control to the Democrats
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 11/11/06 | By Charles McVety

Posted on 11/11/2006 12:38:04 AM PST by JohnHuang2

The Republican Party lost the mid-term elections primarily due to the war in Iraq; however, there were other contributing factors. According to the Pew Research Centre, 78 percent of evangelicals in the United States voted Republican in 2004. This week polls indicate that just 50 percent of evangelicals voted for the Republicans, and evangelical turnout was dramatically lower. The Democrats, with pro same-sex marriage, pro-abortion leader Nancy Pelosi, now control the legislative agenda of the U.S. government. How did this happen?

The Rev. Ted Haggard, the defrocked president of the National Association of Evangelicals led a two-year campaign to subject the evangelical church to the laws of global warming. The introduction of the earth movement has confused the church with neo-pagan teachings. In Romans Chapter 1, God warns us not to place creation over the Creator.

The global warming movement began at the 1992 U.N. Earth Summit where its director, Maurice Strong, started with the statement "We must therefore transform our attitudes and values, and adopt a renewed respect for the superior laws of divine nature." Strong subsequently passed several worldwide laws in 1997 known as the Kyoto Accord. In 1994, the U.N. commissioned Strong to write the Earth Covenant that was introduced in 2000 as the Earth Charter. The new edict was written on papyrus paper, placed in a replica of the Ark of the Covenant, ceremoniously ushered into the U.N. and called "the new 10 commandments," a "Global Ethic" that will transcend all religions and countries.

(Column continues below)

Nearly two years ago, Rev. Haggard began his earth campaign as he threatened the Republican U.S. Senate, stating that he would turn the evangelicals against them if they refused to ratify global warming laws. On March 10, 2005, the New York Times described his efforts with the headline "Evangelical Leaders Swing Influence Behind Effort to Combat Global Warming." Haggard said in the article: "The question is, will evangelicals make a difference? And the answer is, the Senate thinks so. We do represent 30 million people, and we can mobilize them if we have to." Haggard's vice president, Richard Cizik, followed by saying, "When evangelicals speak, Republicans tend to listen, and frankly it's Republicans who need to get the message."

The Republican Senate did not take heed to the threat – therefore, Haggard carried out his plan. By February 2006, Evangelicals Against Climate Change was launched with a joint declaration signed by 86 prominent leaders. They went ahead with the program despite protests from a Who's Who of politically powerful evangelicals, including Chuck Colson, James Dobson and the Rev. D. James Kennedy. The CNN headline read "Strange Bedfellows," as evangelicals had joined forces with environmentalists who are well-known for being ungodly and sexually immoral. James 4:4 says, "Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God." They spent an initial $200,000 on the crusade. "We will see tens of millions of evangelicals engaged in the work we are talking about today," said the Rev. Dr. Leith Anderson, now the interim president of the National Association of Evangelicals.

Haggard's "environmental evangelism" as he calls it, continued. In October, the NAE promoted their program "Is God Green?" The organization then stepped up its efforts and launched a new vision for the church on Oct. 18 called Re:Vision, a new action plan to promote environmental activism.

On the surface, this all seems like harmless activity to ensure clean air and clean water. God does command us to be good stewards of the earth but not subservient to it. Everyone wants to reduce pollution and save cute cuddly animals. Unfortunately, this is not the focus. Instead, the global warming movement seeks to trump all other issues, including spiritual concerns, with threats of catastrophic destruction if we don't follow its precepts plus reduce CO2 production, the very gas every plant on earth needs to survive.

God warns us numerous times in Scripture to never subvert His precepts with that of man or earth. Romans Chapter 1, versus 22-26 says, "Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man – and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions."

We all sympathize with Rev. Haggard's pain. He obviously is experienced great torment as he entered into his "vile passions" hiring a homosexual prostitute and buying crystal methamphetamine. His wife and children are devastated by such debauchery, as are the 14,000 members of his church. Haggard confessed that saying, "I am a deceiver and a liar." Millions of airplanes take off and land safely every year, but when one crashes it is headline news around the world. We don't blame all aircraft for the faults of one.

God warns us not to place anything above Him. His first commandment in Exodus 20:3 is "You shall have no other gods before me." We cannot subjugate Father God to mother earth. The original sin of Adam was to trust the creation over the Creator. God gave man dominion over the earth, not subjugation under it. Jesus Himself says to us in Luke 21:34, "And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting (drugs), and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares." The hedonistic cares of this life, including drugs, drink and the earth, must not be our concern. We are to focus on eternal affairs, not temporal things.

Today we live in the last days before the return of Christ. Second Thessalonians 2:3 warns us to "Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition." I believe this "falling away" has begun.

The seductive earth movement has crept into our churches and is leading us to trust the creation over the Creator. The "False Prophet" or Apostate Faith described in Revelation 13 as the lamb with two horns and verse 17 as Mystery Babylon and the Scarlet Harlot clearly lines up with the earth movement of today. My book "The Great Falling Away," to be released Dec. 15, compares 100 aspects of the "Apostate Faith" with the earth worship of today.

Scripture warns us "be not deceived," "beware of the false prophets," "take heed lest you be led astray." Haggard assisted in exalting the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi to power. He was led astray and is now suffering tremendously. We need to pray for him and pray for protection for us. If it can happen to a great leader such as Haggard, the former president of the National Association of Evangelicals representing 51 denominations with 30 million members, then it can happen to you or me. With God's help, we can avoid being seduced into "falling away" as we place Jesus Christ Lord of all, including the earth.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: tedhaggard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: Thunder90
Many of those evangelicals are part of the Pysbertarian church, which has a track record of being ultra liberal.

And that is called "bearing false witness". Find a liberal Presbyterian body on this list: http://www.nae.net/index.cfm?FUSEACTION=nae.members

41 posted on 11/11/2006 1:38:38 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

I guess you want this place to be Donk City.


42 posted on 11/11/2006 1:39:36 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
So is it purely a matter of being part of this organization, or does it denote all non-high church Protestants, or is there some specific theological or liturgical definition. I am confused!!

Oh well, as was said above, let us pray on it, and fight the good fight against the leftists.
43 posted on 11/11/2006 1:43:29 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

2 Thessalonians 2
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.


44 posted on 11/11/2006 1:44:09 AM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
Maybe Christans should start the Do-Over Denomination?
45 posted on 11/11/2006 1:44:15 AM PST by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

So you'd prefer a 2/3rds Lib rodent Congress and legislatures and ineffective lib RINO opposition ? I think you're on the wrong website, friend.


46 posted on 11/11/2006 1:47:44 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

What a stupid concept. Conjured up by a complete idiot!


47 posted on 11/11/2006 1:49:25 AM PST by lawdude (The dems see Wal-Mart as a bigger threat to the US than muslim terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

I am an evangelical Christian, and I have never heard of this man until he made the headlines.


48 posted on 11/11/2006 1:50:28 AM PST by James Ewell Brown Stuart (Go back and do your duty even as I have done mine. I would rather die than be whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

What is a true Evangelical? I guess I'm not really sure either.


49 posted on 11/11/2006 1:50:28 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Then I will have to redo my post. I am a fundamentalist and not a evangelical. At least I know who I am now. (Not that I'm that confused. I'm a Christian. I think that sums it up pretty darn tight. As for the rest, details that I don't concern myself with.)


50 posted on 11/11/2006 1:53:23 AM PST by James Ewell Brown Stuart (Go back and do your duty even as I have done mine. I would rather die than be whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good article, thanks for posting, but I think what happened with Haggard is that God exposed him and brought him down just like God brought down Baker and Swaggart. I knew about Haggard when I voted and I voted straight Repubican.

The fact is, God will not allow His holy name to be dragged through the mud and God will not allow a man who has access to thousands of souls to use Him to try to implement an agenda that is against His commandments and principles. That's what I belive happened with Haggard.

51 posted on 11/11/2006 2:09:18 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanFreePath

When are all religions going to free themselves up from crazy men on power guilt fear and control trips.


52 posted on 11/11/2006 2:27:27 AM PST by tkathy (The choice is clear: White hat people or white flag people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush

I concur with the Google/Youtube assessment -- college turnout was significant here in Wisconsin. And college kids couldn't care less about Foley and the MSM scandals.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=528978


53 posted on 11/11/2006 2:33:05 AM PST by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
When are all religions going to free themselves up from crazy men on power guilt fear and control trips.

A long time ago I heard of the 'The Committee to Repeal Original Sin'. Unfortunately its work is not yet completed! This is true for religious folks and non-religious folks.

54 posted on 11/11/2006 2:40:48 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

The timing of Haggard public meltdown was uncannily 'perfect' for the radical Dems victory election sweep.


55 posted on 11/11/2006 2:40:53 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Very true.


56 posted on 11/11/2006 2:42:25 AM PST by tkathy (The choice is clear: White hat people or white flag people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
As a Baptist I never heard of Haggard.

However, from seeing his picture, I am surprised that he could fool so many people.

I am sure many of these mega-church organizations are headed by homosexuals.

Most seem to all have an effeminate aspect about them

57 posted on 11/11/2006 2:56:53 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
There are big E and little e evangelicals. (Sort of like a big C Catholic always means Roman Catholic, while a small c catholic usage can get you into a flame war if you aren't careful.)

The NAE is evangelical in the small e sense - what you would probably consider conservative 'born again' protestant, but there are many small e evangelicals who aren't part of the NAE.

Small e evangelicals would also include conservative members of the mainline protestant denominations who still adhere to traditional Christian beliefs.

Big E evangelicals are generally distinguished from the Reformed (Lutheran and Calvinist) traditions. Generally, they will follow a dispensational 'Left Behind' theology.

I'll use my church as a specific example. The church membership is broadly evangelical. You have to be a professing Christian to join. The officers, on the other hand, have to subscribe to the historical Reformed standards, so I would not classify the church as a big "E" Evangelical body (although it is associated with the NAE.

To try to answer your question more directly, evangelical (small e) can be used to denote any protestant (even high church in its broadest sense), can be used as shorthand for 'conservative protestant' (whatever that may mean), it can mean non- high church protestant, non - mainline protestant, or it can mean non -reformed protestant. With so many possible meanings, I can see why you could be confused.

It can also be used as part of a name of a church body, such as Evangelical Lutheran (a fairly liberal mainline body) or Evangelical Presbyterian (a moderate group that probably wouldn't fall into an Evangelical (big E) grouping.)
58 posted on 11/11/2006 3:01:14 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
If evangelicals left the party, we would win.

Kooks.

McPainintheass, is that you?

59 posted on 11/11/2006 3:08:29 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Thanks for the information, but I am still a little confused. Things are much simpler for us RC's!
60 posted on 11/11/2006 3:16:54 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson