Posted on 11/08/2006 8:49:43 AM PST by MNJohnnie
Dims are having a hay day..........
Rummy GONE!
What will dims do with all their hate?
Aim your anger at where it really belongs.
RUSH, THANK YOU! GOD BLESS YOU FOR GETTING THE TRUTH OUT... NEVER STOP.
Got link?
I pray that they are put out of business by Constitution loving, law and order types, i.e, conservatives.
Rush is right....why didn't Rummy resign last week ...why now? Personally, I dont think he should resign at all!!
no, If the conserative dims got elected, the people that put them in won't change their mind on the WENCH.
bump for later
Was Imus crying about HAROLD FORD no doing well in the polls, Uhggggg?... Boy, sometimes I thing Imus has a "thing" for "famous ford." He sounds like a little girl whining.
Terrible news. I don't understand it...I'm getting sicker.
A campaign of lies and deaths... if people realized what's really going on with this amendment...
The C Word [Mark R. Levin]
11/08 11:19 AM
I am digesting all the arguments about why the Republicans lost yesterday. And there are many out there — from the war, corruption, and illegal immigration to historical trends, spending, Katrina, and local issues. My view: For six years the White House has either refused to or is incapable of leading the conservative movement. It has benefited from the conservative movement. It has turned to conservatives when it needed support on certain issues (like judges) and in four elections (2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006). But this time, for a variety of reasons, conservatives didn't respond as needed.
Even many among the conservative elite and pundit class, while arguing for adherence to conservative principles, condescendingly sneered at segments of the conservative base when efforts were made to pass a federal marriage amendment. I believe they called it a distraction. Yet time and again, when voters are asked to pass judgment on this issue, they vote for traditional marriage in large numbers. You cannot continue to ignore social conservatives, which make-up about one-third of the Republican base, and expect to win elections.
Luminaries at the Weekly Standard were demeaning opponents of open-borders as racist. I believe the word they used was “xenophobic.” Yet this issue cuts across numerous conservative constituencies. It involves law-and-order, national security, assimilation, and fiscal responsibility.
Today the Washington Times, in a news piece, is asserting that one of the only Republican winners in last night's election was John McCain. And it quotes a Republican operative to drive home the point. But Mike DeWine (and to a lesser extent, Lincoln Chafee), one of McCain's Gang of 14 members, went down in a decisive defeat. And McCain is more responsible than most in the Senate for slowing or derailing a variety of conservative initiatives, from tax cuts to judges. Indeed, he has embraced the radical environmental agenda, expanding judicial authority over presidential powers (including the detention and interrogation of foreign unlawful enemy combatants), and was the architect of one of the most egregious abrogation’s of free political speech in modern history. The Times apparently concludes that the lesson of this election is that Republicans are clamoring for Rockefeller-Scranton-Ford Republicanism. I think the opposite is true. We know how to win landslide elections.
The field is wide open for a principled, articulate, and charismatic conservative. The 2008 election begins today.
Well, that all but seals Bush's impeachment. They'll bore in full tilt for the kill with Rumsfeld's blood in the water. And the MSM will be right there, cheering them on and herding the public into support for impeachment.
Hope the President starts lawyering up, like yesterday.
I cannot beleive Freepers are this politically ignorant. They really think their firing the ONLY people in DC on their side HELPS them?
That is so childishly stupid.
Thinking in DC for years is now going to be "Hang tough on Immigration, get fired" Way to destroy your whole political agenda Border Security Crowd.
There's another thread saying he's got no plans to resign??
Rummy wouldn't resign without the nod from Bush.
This is a bad mistake, and a bad indicator for things to come over the next two years from the Bush Admin.
I completely agree. Swing voters are pretty shallow creatures, get all their news from Television, so its easy to see how they got swayed this time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.