Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas
Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.
That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: “ 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document.” Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html
So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.
What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.
On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called “Degussa Furnaces” that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980’s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990’s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.
The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled “An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research” where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of “previous” Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????
Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts
Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .
Also this one
Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts
I do not deserve any medal, I just want to speak the truth and with your help and the help of all the great freepers the truth will be known and it will triumph. The truth is on our side.
This is an attempt to seal the documents so that they never see the light of day.
Too cooool. Kinda makes you feel like one of those underground people in the Matrix doesn't it? LOL
jveritas, you're connected to the matrix now. Keep your wits and watch out for Mr. Smith.
OK, I'm really going to bed now. Just finished e-mailing every addie in my book. May this find the traction in the overworld that it deserves.
Well done.
You are going to be famous, baby.
Thank PD. The important thing is to get the truth out.
So .. what do you think is the NYT's motive in posting this information now ..??
They must have some sleazy motive behing this .. right ..??
Remember they were celebrating today about a poll that showed Lieberman down 12 points from Lamont. They were doing cyber backflips.
Turns out the poll they were citing was from before the Connecticut Dem primary. So let them celebrate! They aren't called DUmmies for nothin'.
I think you are probably right.
But they really stepped deeply into this one, and the truth will come out. Despite their true intentions.
My goodness...the DUmmies are in quite the tizzy over this article.
I don't think they've quite thought it through, huh?
The Left and The Leftist Media did EVERYTHING they could to dismiss these Docs as fakes, or Bogus...
There are ONLY 475,000 Google Entires for "Bogus Document Dump"....
OOPs..
"Entries"...
It's Late, and I'm off to bed...
Got to get my rest before gloating to liberals all day tommorrow...
post this everywhere(yahoo boards other forums..e-mail to every media you know..even your local news..just copy and paste the article of this thread with all of the links
I just sent a link to our local morning talk radio host - 6 to 9 am. He's got a much wider audience than I do. :) (my dogs look at me funny when I'm talking and there's no one else here).
Thank you for the truth, jveritas.
"panicked" - about what ..??
I knew about the bogus polling - our own DrDeb kept showing us the inside details and how the pollsters were using 11-16% oversampling of dems. You can get any numbers you want when you do that.
I don't see how the info they released changes the chances of the repubs retaining congress.
Okay .. I guess I'm missing the point - explain please.
Yep, and they also are doing it on a Friday, so that if it doesn't get the traction THEY want, they can bury it by Monday.
We cannot let that happen. And by the sounds of it, I think there is going to be some serious noise tomorrow--er--today.
Man, I need to get to bed! Tomorrow (I did it again) today will surely be interesting!
Roger on Target,,,Fire For Effect...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.